Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 58 | 72 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 80 | 104 | 130 | 164 |
| 1080p Full HD | 122 | 157 | 197 | 250 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Intel Core Ultra 5 225 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 to deliver a robust Fivem experience, though the combination's suitability depends heavily on your target resolution. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly CPU-bound at lower resolutions, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor only at 4K. Benchmark results indicate that this combo performs well above the playable threshold of 60 FPS for most settings, but the most demanding preset at 4K falls short of that mark.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 250 FPS, while Medium settings yield 197 FPS with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 157 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a solid 122 FPS average. This resolution is clearly where the combo shines, with even the most demanding preset nearly doubling the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but scales downward as expected. Low settings average 164 FPS, Medium settings produce 130 FPS with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS, and High settings maintain 104 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution deliver an average of 80 FPS, which remains comfortably above the playable threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 30-35% reduction in average FPS across most presets, indicating a balanced load shift between CPU and GPU.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080 begins to show its limitations. Low settings average 91 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium settings drop to 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS. High settings average 58 FPS, falling just below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra settings average 45 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K represents a significant performance hit, with average FPS dropping by roughly 45-50% across comparable settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling between resolutions reveals a distinct shift in component responsibility. At 1920x1080, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is the primary driver, as evidenced by the high frame rates that exceed what the GPU would typically cap. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655, allows the system to push past 200 FPS at lower settings. The 10-core, 10-thread configuration with a 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures that Fivem's multiplayer workloads, which often rely on CPU-bound simulation logic, are handled without bottlenecking the GPU.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts noticeably. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth start to matter more, as the pixel throughput demand increases. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance becomes the limiting factor in Ultra settings, where the 80 FPS average is still respectable but shows the GPU's growing influence. The CPU remains sufficient at this resolution, as the 104 FPS High preset average indicates there is still headroom in the processor.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080 is unambiguously the bottleneck. The GPU's 68 RT cores and 8704 shading units are pushed to their limits, and the 320-bit memory bus struggles to feed the massive pixel count. The CPU's role diminishes significantly, as the frame rates are now dictated by the GPU's rasterization throughput. The drop from 72 FPS at Medium to 58 FPS at High demonstrates that the GPU's fill rate, listed at 164.2 GPixel/s, is the ceiling at this resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Medium, which delivers an average of 72 FPS. This preset balances visual quality with performance, and the minimum of 61 FPS ensures that brief dips stay just above the threshold. High settings at this resolution average 58 FPS, which fails the playability criterion, so Medium is the recommended ceiling.
At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, making Ultra the best choice with an average of 80 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity while still maintaining a 20 FPS cushion above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that even the most demanding settings leave room for stable gameplay, making this resolution the sweet spot for the combo.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are the clear recommendation, averaging 122 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold and provides an excellent experience for competitive or casual play. The 250 FPS average at Low settings demonstrates the CPU's capability, but Ultra is the optimal choice for visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1048 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the top 28% of all configurations, which is a strong showing for a system with this hardware mix. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the combo, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance complements the GPU's high-end rasterization capabilities.
The percentile data supports this positioning. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile compared to all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36938. The GPU, while older, still holds the 68th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23172. The combination of a high-percentile CPU with a mid-to-high-percentile GPU results in a system that handles Fivem's unique blend of CPU-heavy multiplayer logic and GPU-intensive rendering well, though the 4K ceiling prevents a higher rank.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 provide useful context for alternative CPU pairings. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average score of 36945, essentially identical to the Ultra 5 225's 36938, indicating a delta of 0%. This makes the Ryzen 5 5600F a direct performance equivalent for CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018, a 0.2% improvement, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093, a 0.4% improvement. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112, a 0.5% improvement. These deltas are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would yield nearly identical FPS in Fivem when paired with the RTX 3080.
For the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 3080 are less obvious in performance. The NVIDIA P106-100 has an average score of 23249, a 0.3% delta from the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also a 0.3% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a 0.4% delta. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, a 0.4% delta. These rivals represent similar average benchmark scores, though their real-world gaming performance may differ due to driver support and architecture differences. For Fivem specifically, the RTX 3080's higher VRAM capacity and bandwidth give it an edge over these alternatives.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K with high settings?
A: No. The measured data shows High settings at 3840x2160 average 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings at 72 FPS is the highest playable preset at this resolution.
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?
A: 2560x1440 offers the best balance, as Ultra settings average 80 FPS while maintaining all presets above 60 FPS. This resolution leverages both the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's capabilities without hitting the 4K bottleneck.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600F have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the AMD chip at 36945 versus the Intel chip at 36938, a delta of 0%. Expect virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The frame rate drops from 72 FPS at Medium to 45 FPS at Ultra, showing that the GPU's throughput cannot sustain high settings at this resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is more often the constraint.
Q: What average FPS can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 122 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience for most gameplay scenarios.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: It ranks 1048 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 28% of all configurations tested for Fivem. This is a strong result for a system with a mid-range current-gen CPU and a previous-generation high-end GPU.