Fivem

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a top-tier combination for Fivem, a multiplayer title that scales heavily with both CPU and GPU depending on the resolution and preset. Measured frame rates show that this combo exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested setting across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, with the most demanding Ultra preset still delivering 62.9 FPS at 3840x2160. The data indicates that users can max out the game’s settings at all resolutions without dropping below playable performance, though the margin at 4K Ultra is slim enough that those seeking higher headroom might prefer High settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 62.9 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset and resolution tested, and it remains playable, though with less margin than lower settings.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, producing an average FPS of 117.4. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving substantial headroom for multiplayer fluctuations common in Fivem.

Q: How does the RTX 4090’s performance compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347, which is nearly identical to the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140, 0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores higher at 61896, putting the RTX 4090 2.5% behind, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores lower at 58657, making the RTX 4090 2.9% ahead.

Q: Is the Core i9-14900K significantly faster than its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097. The nearest rival, the Core i9-14900KF, scores 79371, which is only 0.3% higher. The Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is 0.6% ahead at 79574, and the AMD EPYC 7413 is 1.2% ahead at 80041. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, putting the i9-14900K 1.7% ahead of that chip.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the measured average FPS is 293.3. This is exceptionally high, indicating the combination is far beyond the requirements for smooth play at this resolution, even with lower presets.

Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Low settings?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 136.5. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, showing that even the most resolution-heavy scenario with minimal graphical load runs comfortably.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the one that maximizes visual quality while maintaining playability. The data shows this combo can handle the highest tested preset at every resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average FPS of 62.9. This is the best settings option because it is the most graphically intensive preset tested and still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings produce 82.5 FPS, Medium yields 105.4 FPS, and Low reaches 136.5 FPS, but Ultra is the optimal choice for those prioritizing image quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves an average FPS of 117.4. This is the best settings option, providing a high visual fidelity experience with a substantial frame rate buffer above 60 FPS. The other presets also perform well—High at 153.5 FPS, Medium at 193 FPS, and Low at 243 FPS—but Ultra is the clear pick for maximum quality.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at an average FPS of 178.8. This is the best settings option, as it delivers the highest graphical detail while maintaining a frame rate nearly three times the playable threshold. Lower presets like High (231.7 FPS), Medium (293.3 FPS), and Low (369.8 FPS) offer even higher speeds, but Ultra provides the best balance for most users.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rival components, several alternatives would deliver nearly identical performance in Fivem based on average benchmark scores. For the CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900KF is the closest match, with an average score of 79371 versus the i9-14900K’s 79097, a delta of only -0.3%. This means the KF variant, which lacks integrated graphics, would perform essentially the same in-game. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is also similar at 79574 (0.6% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80041 (1.2% delta) offers slightly higher raw scores. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 trails at 77740, with the i9-14900K being 1.7% faster.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090’s average score of 60347 places it alongside several workstation-class cards. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches it almost exactly with a score of 60326 (0% delta), meaning in Fivem, these would likely produce very similar frame rates. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is also close at 60140 (0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is slightly faster at 61896, putting the RTX 4090 2.5% behind, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is slower at 58657, with the RTX 4090 being 2.9% ahead. For a gaming-focused build, the RTX 4090 remains the stronger choice due to its architecture, but the benchmark data shows these alternatives would behave comparably in terms of raw scoring.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can absolutely run Fivem, and it does so with remarkable headroom at most settings. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, meaning they all stay at or above 60 FPS. The best settings at 4K is Ultra, which produces an average FPS of 62.9. This is a playable result, but it is the only scenario where performance dips close to the threshold; users who prefer a larger buffer might opt for High at 82.5 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is even more favorable. All presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 117.4 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, providing a smooth experience even in crowded multiplayer scenes. The 1920x1080 resolution shows no concern whatsoever, as Ultra runs at 178.8 FPS, and every other preset exceeds 231 FPS. The data indicates that the i9-14900K and RTX 4090 combination is overkill for Fivem at lower resolutions, but it is precisely the kind of hardware that ensures no frame rate drops during intense gameplay.

The combo’s performance is also reflected in its ranking. It holds the 93rd position out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top percentile for this game. This ranking confirms that the hardware is not just adequate but exceptional for Fivem, capable of handling the game’s most demanding settings without compromise.

CPU and GPU Roles

Understanding which component matters more in Fivem requires examining how performance scales with resolution and preset changes. The measured FPS data reveals that the GPU becomes increasingly important as resolution rises, while the CPU’s role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.

At 1920x1080, the gap between presets is substantial. Low settings produce 369.8 FPS, while Ultra drops to 178.8 FPS, a difference of 191 FPS. This wide spread indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed by graphical settings, but the CPU must also keep up with such high frame rates. The i9-14900K, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, is well-suited to handle the game’s multiplayer logic and physics at these speeds. The CPU’s high single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2655, ensures that Fivem’s simulation thread does not become a bottleneck when the GPU is outputting hundreds of frames per second.

At 2560x1440, the difference between Low (243 FPS) and Ultra (117.4 FPS) narrows to 125.6 FPS. This suggests the GPU is still the primary driver of settings-based scaling, but the reduced frame rates mean the CPU has more breathing room. The RTX 4090’s 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth become more relevant here, as higher resolutions demand more memory bandwidth and processing power.

At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (136.5 FPS) and Ultra (62.9 FPS) is 73.6 FPS. The lower absolute frame rates indicate that the GPU is now the dominant factor, as the resolution increase places a heavier burden on the RTX 4090’s shading units and memory interface. The CPU’s role diminishes because the frame rate is low enough that its single-threaded performance is no longer a limiting factor. The data shows that the GPU scaling from 1080p to 4K is significant—Ultra drops from 178.8 FPS to 62.9 FPS—while the CPU’s influence, while present, is secondary at higher resolutions.

In summary, for Fivem, the CPU is crucial for achieving maximum frame rates at 1080p and ensuring smooth multiplayer interactions, while the GPU becomes the primary determinant of performance at 1440p and especially 4K. The i9-14900K’s strengths in single-core tasks and the RTX 4090’s raw throughput work in tandem, but the balance shifts toward the GPU as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination ranks 93rd out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 2.5% of all configurations tested, which is a strong indicator of its capabilities. The rank reflects the measured FPS across all resolutions and presets, and the data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems in this game.

To put this in perspective, the CPU itself ranks in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 88th percentile against all GPUs. However, the combo’s rank in Fivem is higher than either individual component’s percentile, suggesting that the pairing is particularly well-suited for this game. The i9-14900K’s high single-core performance and the RTX 4090’s massive memory bandwidth and compute power combine to deliver exceptional results in a multiplayer title that often depends on consistent frame delivery.

The ranking also implies that only 92 other tested combos deliver better performance in Fivem, likely those using even more specialized or newer hardware. For most users, the 93rd position out of 3707 is an excellent outcome, and the measured FPS data confirms that this combo provides a playable experience at every setting and resolution tested. The fact that Ultra settings at 4K still hit 62.9 FPS, while the same settings at 1080p reach 178.8 FPS, underscores the versatility of this hardware pairing. Whether a player prioritizes maximum visual fidelity at 4K or competitive frame rates at 1080p, this combo ranks among the best available for Fivem.