Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
248 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
124 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
164 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
81 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
43 FPS
6.3ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 56 72 92
1440p QHD 81 106 129 164
1080p Full HD 124 158 195 248

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 158
1920x1080 Low 248
1920x1080 Medium 195
1920x1080 Ultra 124
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 129
2560x1440 Ultra 81
3840x2160 High 56
3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 72
3840x2160 Ultra 43

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a broad range of frame rates in Fivem, scaling from 42.8 FPS at 4K Ultra to 247.8 FPS at 1080p Low. The data indicates that this combination is highly capable for the game, with the primary limitation appearing only at the highest resolution and preset. The RTX 3080, holding a 68th percentile rank among all GPUs, provides substantial graphics horsepower, while the Core i9-14900K, ranking in the 95th percentile for CPUs, ensures the system is not likely to be held back by processor overhead. This analysis will break down the measured performance across resolutions, settings, and provide practical guidance for optimizing your experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combination in Fivem show a clear and consistent pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system operates at very high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 247.8 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the system is far from being stressed. The Medium preset delivers 195.3 FPS, and the High preset is nearly as fast at 158.4 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at this resolution yields a robust 124.4 FPS average. None of these averages approach the 60 FPS threshold, meaning this resolution is well within the system's comfort zone for any setting.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong, though the scaling from 1080p is evident. The Low preset averages 164.3 FPS, which is still exceptionally fluid. The Medium preset drops to 128.5 FPS, and the High preset maintains a high 105.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still produces an average of 80.5 FPS. This data indicates that 1440p Ultra is easily playable, with the average frame rate sitting comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The gaps between presets are consistent, showing roughly a 20-25% performance cost for each step up in quality.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system begins to show its limits. The Low preset averages 92 FPS, which is still very playable and demonstrates the raw power of the RTX 3080. The Medium preset averages 71.5 FPS, maintaining a solid experience above the 60 FPS target. However, the High preset falls to an average of 55.6 FPS, dipping below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to maintain playable performance, with an average of 42.8 FPS. This is a significant drop of 12.8 FPS from the High preset, indicating that the combination of 4K resolution and Ultra settings is too demanding for this hardware.

It is important to note that the data provided for Fivem includes only average FPS figures; the min and max frame rate fields are null. Therefore, this analysis cannot comment on frame time consistency or 1% lows, only the overall average experience. The data clearly shows that this CPU and GPU combination is powerful enough for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and it is capable of a smooth 4K experience when settings are moderated to Medium or below.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i9-14900K and RTX 3080 run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but not at the highest settings. The data shows an average of 71.5 FPS at 4K with Medium settings, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The High preset drops to 55.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 42.8 FPS, so those are not recommended for a consistently smooth experience at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: According to the benchmark data, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 80.5 FPS. This is the highest quality preset that still maintains an average well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance for this resolution.

Q: How does this system perform at 1080p?

A: Performance at 1920x1080 is exceptional across the board. The average frame rates range from 124.4 FPS on the Ultra preset to 247.8 FPS on the Low preset. The system is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors easily, with even the most demanding setting providing a very high average frame rate.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 a strong GPU for Fivem?

A: The benchmark data indicates the RTX 3080 holds a 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its performance in Fivem is strong enough to deliver playable frame rates at all resolutions up to 4K, provided the settings are adjusted appropriately, showing it is a capable card for this title.

Q: How does the Core i9-14900K compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, has a score of 79371, which is a performance delta of -0.3%. This indicates the two CPUs offer nearly identical performance, with the KF variant being slightly faster in the aggregate benchmark data.

Q: Is the Ultra preset at 4K ever playable with this hardware?

A: No, based on the measured data, the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of only 42.8 FPS. This is significantly below the 60 FPS playability threshold and would not provide a smooth gaming experience. The High preset, at 55.6 FPS, also fails to meet the threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the goal is to identify the most demanding preset that still achieves an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS threshold. The data provides a clear answer for each case.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice. It delivers an average of 124.4 FPS, which is the highest quality setting available and remains far above the 60 FPS target. There is no performance compromise needed at this resolution, as even the most demanding settings leave a large margin for smooth gameplay.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also provides the best experience. The average frame rate at this setting is 80.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. This allows users to enjoy the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, making it the recommended configuration for 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Medium preset is the most demanding option that maintains playable performance, with an average of 71.5 FPS. While the Low preset is faster at 92 FPS, the Medium preset offers a better balance of visual quality and performance, staying above the 60 FPS line. The High and Ultra presets are not viable at this resolution, as their averages of 55.6 FPS and 42.8 FPS, respectively, fall short of the playability threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context on what other hardware would deliver similar performance. For the CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900KF is the closest match, with an average benchmark score of 79371 compared to the i9-14900K's 79097, a negligible delta of -0.3%. This means the 14900KF would behave nearly identically in Fivem. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, with a score of 79574, is also very close, being 0.6% faster in aggregate benchmarks. The AMD EPYC 7413, scoring 80041, is 1.2% faster, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, scoring 77740, is 1.7% slower. These CPUs would all provide a very similar level of processor performance in this game.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are quite surprising, as they are not high-end desktop cards. The NVIDIA P106-100 has an average score of 23249, a delta of -0.3% compared to the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M have scores of 23250 and 23273, respectively, showing deltas of -0.3% and -0.4%. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X, with a score of 23276, is also -0.4% different. These benchmark scores suggest these GPUs would offer very similar aggregate performance, although the specific gaming experience in Fivem could vary. The data indicates that the RTX 3080's closest rivals, based on the average benchmark score, are these cards, not other more modern desktop GPUs.

The Verdict

The benchmark results are definitive: this PC can run Fivem, and it does so very well for the majority of configurations. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with every preset, with the Ultra setting providing an average of 124.4 FPS. This makes it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on all presets, with the Ultra setting being the best option at 80.5 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a perfect balance of high visual fidelity and smooth performance.

The only area of concern is 3840x2160. Here, the system remains playable on the Low and Medium presets, with averages of 92 FPS and 71.5 FPS, respectively. However, the High preset, at 55.6 FPS, and the Ultra preset, at 42.8 FPS, fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The verdict is clear: for a consistently smooth 4K experience, users must dial settings down to Medium. For 1080p and 1440p, this combination is more than sufficient to run the game at maximum settings, providing a high-performance experience without compromise.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 performs exceptionally well. The data shows it ranks 1079th out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the top 29% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing. This high rank reflects the combination of a top-tier, 95th percentile CPU and a powerful, 68th percentile GPU. The result is a system that is not only capable of playing Fivem at high settings but also outperforms the majority of other hardware configurations that have been benchmarked for this game. This rank confirms that while not the absolute fastest, this is a very competitive and well-balanced setup for Fivem.