Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 80 | 99 | 126 |
| 1440p QHD | 111 | 143 | 179 | 227 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 218 | 272 | 345 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
This PC combination delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, with the data showing that every tested resolution and preset configuration clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The benchmark results position this Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 pairing as a high-end option within the database, ranking 180th out of 3,707 tested combos for this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are remarkably high across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 345 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure for this combo. Medium settings yield 272 FPS on average, with a minimum of 232 FPS and a maximum of 313 FPS. High settings drop slightly to 218 FPS average, while Ultra still maintains a robust 169 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily bottlenecked by the game engine rather than the hardware, as even the most demanding preset nearly triples the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably but remains impressive. Low settings produce 227 FPS average, Medium delivers 179 FPS with a minimum of 152 and maximum of 206 FPS, High settings achieve 143 FPS, and Ultra maintains 111 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is roughly 116 FPS, showing that the RTX 5080 has substantial headroom even at higher pixel counts.
At 3840x2160, the system still comfortably exceeds playable frame rates. Low settings average 126 FPS, Medium hits 99 FPS with a minimum of 85 and maximum of 114 FPS, High manages 80 FPS, and Ultra stays above 60 with an average of 62 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is particularly noteworthy because it sits just barely above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the most demanding configuration in the dataset.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data reveals a clear pattern: the CPU plays a dominant role at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes increasingly important as resolution rises. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 176 FPS (345 vs 169), indicating that the i7-14700KF's 20 cores and 28 threads can feed frames faster than the RTX 5080 can render them at higher settings. This is classic CPU-bound behavior, where the processor's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,235) becomes the limiting factor.
At 1440p, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The Low-to-Ultra gap narrows to 116 FPS (227 vs 111), suggesting that the RTX 5080's rendering workload is starting to balance with CPU throughput. The GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient to keep pace with the processor's output, but the rendering demands of higher resolutions consume more of the GPU's headroom.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The Low-to-Ultra delta shrinks to 64 FPS (126 vs 62), and the Ultra preset barely clears 60 FPS. This indicates that the RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 256-bit bus are being pushed to their limits, while the CPU has ample spare capacity. The i7-14700KF's PassMark multithread score of 52,425 shows it can handle the game's simulation and network logic without breaking a sweat, even at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996 on average, which is just 0.2% behind the i7-14700KF's 70,163 average benchmark score. This means a system with the Ryzen 7 9700F would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, given that the game is not particularly sensitive to CPU architecture differences at higher resolutions. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads by 1% with a score of 70,879.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 8060S is the closest competitor, with an average score of 55,757 versus the RTX 5080's 56,083, a delta of just 0.6%. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB comes in 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower. On the other side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE outperforms the RTX 5080 by 2.2% with a score of 57,367. In practical terms, any of these GPUs would deliver comparable Fivem performance, with differences of only a few frames per second at most settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 180th out of 3,707 tested configurations for Fivem, placing it in the top 5% of all systems in the database. This rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: the i7-14700KF's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the RTX 5080's 87th percentile among all GPUs combine to produce a system that excels across all resolution tiers. The fact that the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative percentile terms suggests that the processor is slightly overqualified for this game, but that headroom ensures consistent frame delivery without CPU-induced stutters.
The rank is particularly impressive given that Fivem is a multiplayer modification framework that often exhibits inconsistent performance across different hardware configurations. The data indicates this combo avoids the common pitfalls of CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p while still delivering playable 4K Ultra performance, which is rare even among high-end systems.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Fivem at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 3840x2160, all four settings are playable, with Ultra achieving 62 FPS average and High reaching 80 FPS. The verdict data lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as all playable at 4K, with Ultra being the best settings at 62 FPS average.
At 2560x1440, the system offers substantial overhead. Ultra settings average 111 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold, and High reaches 143 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for players who want high visual fidelity without sacrificing frame rate, as even the most demanding preset stays well above typical high-refresh-rate monitor requirements.
At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional across the board. Ultra averages 169 FPS, High hits 218 FPS, and Low reaches 345 FPS. The minimum recorded frame rate at any setting is 232 FPS (Medium), meaning the system never dips below 60 FPS even in the most demanding scenes. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays, this resolution offers the most headroom.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the data shows an average of 62 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable with this hardware?
A: The maximum recorded average is 345 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The highest minimum frame rate observed is 232 FPS at 1080p Medium.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F?
A: The i7-14700KF scores 70,163 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 7 9700F's 69,996, indicating nearly identical performance.
Q: Is the RTX 5080 the strongest GPU option for this game?
A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE outperforms it by 2.2% in average benchmark score, though the RTX 5080 still ranks in the 87th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS in all scenarios?
A: Yes, every tested resolution and preset combination produces an average above 60 FPS. The closest result is 4K Ultra at 62 FPS average.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?
A: It ranks 180th out of 3,707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the top 5% of all configurations in the database.