Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, ranking in the 94th percentile for the CPU and 86th for the GPU. With measured frame rates reaching 333 FPS at 1080p Low settings, this system is overwhelmingly capable of running the multiplayer title at high refresh rates. The data shows that at every tested resolution, the combo clears the 60 FPS playable threshold even at Ultra settings, with the most demanding configuration (4K Ultra) hitting exactly 60 FPS average.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are tightly clustered within a 2% performance band. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind. Interestingly, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K sits 1% higher in average score, making it the only nearby alternative that edges out the i7-14700KF. These differences are minor enough that users could expect virtually identical gaming behavior in Fivem, where the workload may not fully saturate 20 cores.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, with a score just 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X posts a 1.1% higher score, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S show 2.6% and 2.7% higher scores respectively. This clustering suggests that swapping to any of these cards would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem at the tested settings, though the RTX 4080's 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth remain notable advantages for texture-heavy multiplayer scenarios.

The practical takeaway is that this system sits at the top of a performance plateau where several high-end components deliver within 3% of each other. Users upgrading from any of these rivals would see no meaningful FPS difference in Fivem, as the game's engine appears to be the limiting factor rather than raw compute capability.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 163 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51% reduction in frame rate, yet the Ultra preset still provides more than double the playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best playable setting with an average of 107 FPS. The drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra represents a 34% performance hit, but the system maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, Ultra produces exactly 60 FPS average, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above the playable threshold. This is the only configuration where the system sits precisely at the boundary, leaving no headroom for unexpected frame drops in busy multiplayer scenes. The Medium preset at 4K offers a safer 96 FPS average with minimums of 82 FPS, which may be preferable for consistent competitive play.

The data reveals that this combo can max out every resolution tested, which is rare among the 3,707 combos tracked. At 1080p, even the most demanding settings produce frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of typical high-end monitors, while 4K Ultra users should accept the 60 FPS cap as the ceiling.

CPU and GPU Roles

The workload distribution between the i7-14700KF and RTX 4080 shifts predictably across resolutions. At 1080p, the system achieves 333 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the CPU's 28 threads are more than sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions where the graphics card has less work per frame. The 20-core processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock appears to be the limiting factor at these high frame rates, as the RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is likely underutilized.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the frame rate drops to 219 FPS on Low settings, a 34% reduction from 1080p. This scaling suggests that the GPU begins to take a more significant role, though the CPU remains capable of sustaining high throughput. At 4K Low, the 122 FPS result shows a further 44% decline, indicating that pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint.

The Ultra preset scaling tells a similar story. From 163 FPS at 1080p to 107 FPS at 1440p to 60 FPS at 4K, the performance degradation is 34% and 44% respectively, matching the Low preset pattern almost exactly. This consistent scaling across presets indicates that resolution has a uniform impact on the bottleneck, with the GPU becoming progressively more critical as pixel count rises.

At 4K Ultra, the system hits exactly 60 FPS, which is likely a hard limit imposed by the game engine or the measurement methodology rather than a hardware ceiling. The RTX 4080's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present but not fully exercised by Fivem's rendering workload, suggesting that the game's optimization and multiplayer server load play a substantial role in final frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 60 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which exactly meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the maximum frame rate achievable with this combo?

A: The highest measured average is 333 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings, with Medium settings at 1080p producing 263 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54,247 on average, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 1.1% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% higher.

Q: Which component limits performance at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 333 FPS, the CPU likely becomes the bottleneck, as the i7-14700KF's 28 threads must process game logic and draw calls faster than the GPU renders frames at this low workload.

Q: Is there a resolution where the system fails to hit 60 FPS?

A: No. All tested resolutions and presets, including 4K Ultra at 60 FPS, meet or exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What percentile does this GPU rank in compared to all tested GPUs?

A: The RTX 4080 sits in the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 54,247 across all tested workloads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce 333 FPS average, Medium settings yield 263 FPS with minimums of 223 FPS and maximums of 302 FPS, High settings reach 210 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 163 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 170 FPS, demonstrating the GPU's headroom even at maximum quality.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly playable. Low settings achieve 219 FPS, Medium settings hit 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS and maximum of 199 FPS, High settings manage 138 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 107 FPS. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 34% to 35% across presets, indicating consistent scaling.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers smooth gameplay. Low settings reach 122 FPS, Medium settings provide 96 FPS with minimums of 82 FPS and maximums of 110 FPS, High settings achieve 77 FPS, and Ultra settings hit exactly 60 FPS. The 4K Medium preset shows a 14 FPS minimum-to-average gap, which is the largest variance in the dataset and suggests potential stutter in busy multiplayer moments.

The Medium presets are the only configurations with complete min/max data. At 1080p, the 223 FPS minimum is still well above any competitive threshold. At 1440p, the 147 FPS minimum confirms stable performance. At 4K, the 82 FPS minimum on Medium shows that even worst-case frame times remain above the playable threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 220th overall. This places it in the top 6% of all configurations tracked, which is consistent with the high percentile scores of both components individually. The rank reflects the combination's ability to maintain high frame rates at all resolutions, not just raw benchmark scores.

The ranking gap between the combo's position and the CPU's 94th percentile suggests that Fivem's performance is not purely CPU-bound. The GPU's 86th percentile is slightly lower, indicating that the RTX 4080 contributes more to the final ranking than the processor. This is unusual for a multiplayer title, where CPU performance typically dominates due to server-side processing and multiple player characters.

The 220th rank out of 3,707 combos means that 3,487 other pairings perform worse in this specific game. The systems ranked above likely include higher-tier components such as the RTX 4090 or Threadripper processors, but the data shows that this combo still delivers the maximum 60 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is the practical ceiling for the game's current engine.

The Verdict

This PC can definitively run Fivem at every tested resolution and preset combination, with no configuration falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 163 FPS at Ultra settings, providing a massive margin for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings maintain 107 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz displays with room to spare. At 3840x2160, the system hits exactly 60 FPS at Ultra, meaning players can enjoy maximum visual quality at standard 60Hz 4K displays.

The best settings per resolution are Ultra for all three, as verified by the verdict data. The i7-14700KF's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample processing power for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, while the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory ensures texture-rich environments load without issue. The only consideration is that 4K Ultra leaves zero headroom, so players who experience server-side lag may prefer the 4K Medium preset with its 96 FPS average and 82 FPS minimum.

For competitive players, the 1080p Low preset's 333 FPS may be the optimal choice to minimize input latency, though the Ultra preset's 163 FPS is still far above any practical competitive threshold. The system's 220th rank out of 3,707 combos confirms that it is a top-tier configuration for this game, and the measured data validates that it can handle the most demanding scenarios Fivem presents.