Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
176 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
59 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
9.3ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,282

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 43 50 66
1440p QHD 59 74 93 114
1080p Full HD 85 108 140 176

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 108
1920x1080 Low 176
1920x1080 Medium 140
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 93
2560x1440 Ultra 59
3840x2160 High 43
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 50
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The data recorded for Fivem shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets for the Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. At 1920x1080, the combination delivers high frame rates across all tested settings, while 2560x1440 remains playable at most presets, and 3840x2160 requires a significant reduction in visual quality to maintain smooth gameplay. The benchmark results indicate that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K support limited to the lowest settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this configuration provides a detailed look at performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. The recorded average frame rates are as follows.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset produces an average of 32.4 FPS, which falls well below the playable threshold. The High preset improves this to 42.8 FPS, still insufficient for smooth play. Medium reaches 50.2 FPS, approaching but not clearing the 60 FPS mark. Only the Low preset achieves a playable average at 65.5 FPS. This represents a 33.1 FPS difference between the lowest and highest settings at 4K, showing a heavy dependence on preset selection.

Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers improve substantially. The Low preset delivers an average of 113.8 FPS, which is the highest recorded at this resolution. Medium follows at 92.5 FPS, and High at 73.5 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 58.6 FPS, just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The spread from Low to Ultra is 55.2 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor when pushing higher settings at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the configuration shows its strongest results. The Low preset averages 176.3 FPS, while Medium reaches 139.5 FPS. High delivers 107.7 FPS, and Ultra still manages a solid 84.7 FPS. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, with the lowest recorded average being 84.7 FPS at Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 91.6 FPS, demonstrating that even the most demanding settings leave ample headroom.

The database records no minimum or maximum frame rate values for any test, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS. The data shows a consistent pattern: higher resolutions and settings reduce performance in a predictable manner, with the most dramatic drops occurring between 1080p and 1440p, and again between 1440p and 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU plays the dominant role in determining Fivem performance for this combination, particularly as resolution increases. The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a high-end processor with 20 cores and 28 threads, and its benchmark scores place it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, by contrast, sits in the 65th percentile among GPUs. This disparity suggests the CPU has substantial headroom, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Evidence for this comes from the scaling between presets. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 91.6 FPS, which shows that the GPU is being stressed by increased settings but still has capacity. At 2560x1440, the same preset difference is 55.2 FPS, a smaller absolute gap, indicating the GPU is starting to saturate. At 3840x2160, the gap narrows to 33.1 FPS, and even the Low preset only reaches 65.5 FPS. This pattern is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, where raising resolution increases the load on the graphics card more than on the processor.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 176.3 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the processor must keep up with draw calls and game logic. The i7-14700KF, with its 28 threads and 5.60 GHz boost clock, is well equipped for this task. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 and single-core score of 6235 indicate strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The data suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any tested resolution, and the RTX 2070 SUPER is the component that determines playability.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this game. For the Intel Core i7-14700KF, the closest alternative is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which has an average benchmark score 0.2% higher. This means the two processors would deliver nearly identical performance in Fivem, making the Ryzen 7 9700F a direct substitute. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.9%, both within a margin that would produce comparable frame rates. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% faster, which could translate to slightly higher minimum frame rates in CPU-heavy moments, but the average FPS would be similar.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, which has an average score 1% lower. This workstation GPU would produce nearly identical results in Fivem, though it is not a gaming-focused product. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 1.2% faster, and the Intel Arc B570 is 1.3% faster. The Intel Arc A750 is 1.5% faster, making it the closest desktop alternative that would offer a very small performance uplift. In practice, any of these GPUs would deliver frame rates within a few percent of the RTX 2070 SUPER, meaning the playable settings at each resolution would remain the same.

When considering a full system swap, pairing the i7-14700KF with a GPU in this performance class would yield similar results. The data shows that the CPU has significant headroom, so even a slightly slower processor would not change the verdict. Conversely, a faster GPU would improve the 4K and Ultra preset performance, but the current combination is balanced around the RTX 2070 SUPER's capabilities.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this combination at 2130 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the upper half of all configurations, though not in the top tier. The percentile positions of the individual components support this: the CPU is in the 94th percentile, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile. The overall combo rank is pulled down by the GPU, which is a mid-range card from the previous generation.

A rank of 2130 means that roughly 43% of tested combos perform better in this game, while 57% perform worse. The data shows that the CPU is overqualified for the GPU, which is the limiting factor. In a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification of Grand Theft Auto V, the performance is heavily influenced by server-side code and the number of players in the session. However, the measured FPS data reflects the single-player benchmark conditions, and the combo rank is based on those measurements.

For context, the RTX 2070 SUPER was released in 2019, and the i7-14700KF in 2023. This generational gap means the GPU is the older component, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but strained at 4K. The combo rank of 2130 reflects this balance, and users with this system should expect performance in line with other mid-range GPU and high-end CPU pairings.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with playable frame rates, but at 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. The playable threshold for this analysis is 60 FPS, and the measured data shows the following.

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 65.5 FPS. High, Medium, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 42.8, 50.2, and 32.4 FPS respectively. The best settings at 4K are Low, which provides a comfortable margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium. High averages 73.5 FPS, Low averages 113.8 FPS, and Medium averages 92.5 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 58.6 FPS, which is just below 60 FPS and therefore not considered playable. The best settings at 1440p are High, which offers a good balance of visual quality and performance.

At 1920x1080, all four settings are playable. Ultra averages 84.7 FPS, High averages 107.7 FPS, Medium averages 139.5 FPS, and Low averages 176.3 FPS. The best settings at 1080p are Ultra, which still provides a solid frame rate well above the threshold.

The verdict is that this system is fully capable of running Fivem at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, and at 4K only with reduced settings. Users who prioritize visual quality should stick to 1440p, while those who want 4K must accept the Low preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows, based on the recorded average FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, which produces an average of 65.5 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the threshold, and it does so by a margin of 5.5 FPS. The next step up, Medium, averages 50.2 FPS, which is 9.8 FPS below the threshold, so there is no option for higher quality at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which averages 73.5 FPS. This is 13.5 FPS above the threshold, providing a comfortable margin. Medium averages 92.5 FPS and Low averages 113.8 FPS, but High is the most demanding preset that remains playable. The Ultra preset at 58.6 FPS is not playable, so High is the recommended choice for maximum quality at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which averages 84.7 FPS. This is 24.7 FPS above the threshold, leaving significant headroom. The Ultra preset is the most demanding option, and it still delivers a smooth experience. High averages 107.7 FPS, Medium averages 139.5 FPS, and Low averages 176.3 FPS, but none of these are necessary since Ultra already meets the playability requirement.

The data shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1080p, users can max out the settings; at 1440p, they must drop one step from Ultra to High; and at 4K, they must drop to Low. This is consistent with the GPU being the limiting factor, as the RTX 2070 SUPER has enough power for 1080p Ultra and 1440p High, but not for 4K at higher presets.