Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Fivem?

A: The recorded data shows 1920x1080 is the strongest option, with every preset (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 1080p is Ultra at 77.1 FPS average.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold, scoring 60.8 FPS average. Medium drops to 46.4 FPS, High falls to 37.2 FPS, and Ultra sits at 30.1 FPS, so higher presets are not playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, which places it within 1% of several competitors. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F trails by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads by 1%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to other cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER holds a 62nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, scores 18159, a 0.4% lead. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189 (0.5% ahead), while the AMD Radeon RX 460 and Intel Arc A770M score 18373 and 18383 respectively, 1.5% and 1.6% ahead.

Q: Which settings should I use for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, with an average of 64 FPS. Medium delivers 79.6 FPS, and Low reaches 102 FPS. Ultra falls short at 52.9 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2696 out of 3707 total tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database.

---

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Fivem. The CPU, with its 20 cores, 28 threads, and a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, provides substantial headroom for the game's multiplayer workloads. The GPU, ranked in the 62nd percentile, becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 157.5 FPS on Low settings, 123.1 FPS on Medium, 100 FPS on High, and 77.1 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51% reduction in frame rate, indicating that even at 1080p, the GPU is responding strongly to increased graphical demands. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4480 in Passmark and 6235 in Cinebench R23 ensures that Fivem's simulation and networking logic do not bottleneck the rendering pipeline at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop consistently: Low falls to 102 FPS, Medium to 79.6 FPS, High to 64 FPS, and Ultra to 52.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 48%, showing that the GPU's workload scaling is becoming more pronounced. The CPU still has ample capacity here, as even the most demanding preset at this resolution stays above the 60 FPS threshold for three out of four settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. Low settings produce 60.8 FPS, Medium drops to 46.4 FPS, High falls to 37.2 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 30.1 FPS. The 4K resolution quadruples the pixel count compared to 1080p, and the RTX 2060 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are stretched thin. The CPU's role diminishes significantly at this resolution, as the rendering load overwhelms the GPU regardless of the processor's capabilities.

The data indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, both components contribute meaningfully, with the CPU handling the game's multiplayer logic and the GPU managing visual fidelity. At 4K, the GPU is the sole bottleneck, and the CPU's performance becomes nearly irrelevant. Users upgrading either component should prioritize the GPU first for higher resolutions, while the CPU's strength is best utilized at 1080p and 1440p where high frame rates are achievable.

---

Best Settings per Resolution

3840x2160 (4K): The only playable preset is Low, which delivers an average of 60.8 FPS. This barely clears the 60 FPS threshold, so users should expect occasional dips in busy multiplayer scenes. Medium falls short at 46.4 FPS, making it unsuitable for consistent play.

2560x1440 (1440p): The most demanding playable preset is High, with an average of 64 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the threshold while offering significantly better visual quality than Medium (79.6 FPS) or Low (102 FPS). Ultra is not recommended, as it drops to 52.9 FPS.

1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra is the best choice, averaging 77.1 FPS. This preset maintains a solid frame rate while maximizing visual fidelity. High (100 FPS) and Medium (123.1 FPS) offer higher headroom, but Ultra remains comfortably above the 60 FPS line. Low (157.5 FPS) is available for competitive play, but the visual compromise is substantial.

---

The Verdict

This system can run Fivem successfully across all three tested resolutions, but the playable settings vary significantly. At 1920x1080, the combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER clears 60 FPS on every preset, with Ultra delivering 77.1 FPS average. This is the ideal environment for the hardware, providing both high frame rates and full visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High settings (64 FPS), with Medium and Low also exceeding 60 FPS. Ultra is the only preset that fails the threshold, coming in at 52.9 FPS. Users with 1440p monitors should stick to High for the best balance of performance and visuals.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, achieving exactly 60.8 FPS average. This is a marginal result, and the experience may feel inconsistent in crowded server environments. Higher presets are not viable, as Medium (46.4 FPS), High (37.2 FPS), and Ultra (30.1 FPS) all fall well below the playable threshold.

Overall, this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it excels across all settings. 1440p is viable with reasonable compromises, while 4K should only be attempted with minimal graphical settings.

---

Similar Performance Alternatives

CPU alternatives: The Intel Core i7-14700KF's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.2% lower average score), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.9% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is marginally faster at 1% higher. In Fivem, any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates, as the game is unlikely to be CPU-bound at the tested resolutions given the GPU's limitations.

GPU alternatives: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER's closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (0.4% higher score), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 460 (1.5% higher), and the Intel Arc A770M (1.6% higher). These GPUs would deliver within roughly 2% of the RTX 2060 SUPER's performance in Fivem, meaning users with any of these cards would see similar frame rates at each resolution and preset combination. The differences are small enough that no meaningful gameplay distinction would be visible.

---

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER holds rank 2696 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem. This places the system in the 27th percentile of all combos, meaning roughly 73% of tested systems perform better. The low ranking is primarily attributable to the GPU, which sits in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 94th percentile. The imbalance between the two components means the system is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions, preventing the CPU's strong performance from translating into higher frame rates.

In the context of the database, this combo is suited for 1080p gaming and modest 1440p play, but it does not compete with higher-end configurations at 4K. The rank reflects the GPU's age and position in the market, as the RTX 2060 SUPER was released in the GeForce 20-series generation and is now marked as end-of-life.

---

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 60.8 FPS average
• Medium: 46.4 FPS average
• High: 37.2 FPS average
• Ultra: 30.1 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 102 FPS average
• Medium: 79.6 FPS average
• High: 64 FPS average
• Ultra: 52.9 FPS average

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 157.5 FPS average
• Medium: 123.1 FPS average
• High: 100 FPS average
• Ultra: 77.1 FPS average

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops proportionally across all settings. The largest relative drop occurs between 1080p and 1440p on Low settings (from 157.5 to 102 FPS, a 35% reduction), while the smallest occurs between 1440p and 4K on Ultra (from 52.9 to 30.1 FPS, a 43% reduction). This confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution, with the CPU providing sufficient performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at the lowest settings and highest frame rates.