Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
154 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
99 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.3ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 33 43 56
1440p QHD 51 62 82 99
1080p Full HD 75 97 121 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Low 99
2560x1440 Medium 82
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 produces a combination that ranks 2823rd out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This ranking reflects a system that is capable of running the game smoothly at standard resolutions, but one that will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: the combo delivers excellent performance at 1080p, good performance at 1440p with settings adjustments, and falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 2160p across all tested presets. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares it to similar hardware, and provides specific guidance on which settings to use for the best experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The Core i7-14700KF and Arc B580 combination sits at rank 2823 out of 3707 total combos tested in Fivem, which places it in the 24th percentile of all systems evaluated. This is a modest position, indicating that while the hardware is far from the bottom of the performance chart, it is also not positioned among the high-end configurations that dominate the upper ranks. The ranking suggests that this combo is best suited for mainstream gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where it can deliver comfortable frame rates, rather than for extreme high-refresh-rate or 4K gaming scenarios.

The CPU component of this combo is notably strong, with the i7-14700KF achieving a 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 70163 places it in the top tier of processors, with multi-threaded performance that excels in both synthetic tests and gaming workloads. The GPU, however, is more modest, with the Arc B580 ranking in the 68th percentile against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 23021. This mismatch between a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU means that in Fivem, the graphics card will typically be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU workload increases significantly.

In the context of the full combo ranking, this pairing demonstrates that Fivem is a game where the GPU plays a critical role in determining overall performance. The CPU's strength ensures that even at lower resolutions where frame rates are high, there is ample processing headroom, but the GPU's capabilities cap the maximum achievable performance. The 2823rd rank out of 3707 combos indicates that many other hardware pairings deliver better Fivem performance, largely due to more powerful graphics cards, while the CPU's contribution is less differentiating in this particular title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Core i7-14700KF performs nearly identically to several AMD and Intel alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the closest match, with an average score of 69996, just 0.2% behind the i7-14700KF's 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX follows at 69875, a 0.4% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, trailing by 0.9%. On the Intel side, the Core Ultra 7 265K actually scores higher at 70879, putting it 1% ahead. For Fivem specifically, any of these CPUs would deliver essentially the same frame rates when paired with the same GPU, as the performance deltas are within the margin of measurement error.

For the GPU, the Arc B580's nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% higher than the Arc B580's 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, trailing by 0.6%, while the RTX 3080 scores 23172, leading by 0.7%. The NVIDIA P106-100 is the farthest at 23249, a 1% lead. In practical terms, all four of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, meaning that if the Arc B580 is unavailable or not preferred, any of these alternatives would offer a very similar gaming experience. The differences are so small that they would be imperceptible in real-world gameplay, with all of them hovering around the same performance envelope.

When considering a full system alternative, swapping the CPU for any of its rivals while keeping the Arc B580 would change Fivem performance by less than 1%, as the game is not heavily CPU-bound at the resolutions where this combo is playable. Conversely, swapping the GPU for any of its rivals while keeping the i7-14700KF would also result in nearly identical performance, with the largest delta being just 1% between the Arc B580 and the P106-100. This means that any combination of the listed CPUs and GPUs would behave essentially the same in Fivem, making the choice between them a matter of platform preference or availability rather than gaming performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Fivem, with the graphics card becoming progressively more important as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 154.1 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 120.9 FPS on Medium, 96.5 FPS on High, and 74.9 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 51% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck even at 1080p, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the graphics card at these settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 98.9 FPS on Low, 82.2 FPS on Medium, 61.6 FPS on High, and 51.1 FPS on Ultra. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p is substantial, with the Low setting losing about 36% of its performance and the Ultra setting losing about 32%. This consistent drop across all settings confirms that the GPU is heavily taxed by the increased pixel count, while the CPU's role remains relatively static. The i7-14700KF's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its 44167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, ensures that it is not limiting the system at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The combo manages only 55.6 FPS on Low, 42.6 FPS on Medium, 33 FPS on High, and 28.4 FPS on Ultra. The performance cliff from 1440p to 4K is steep, with even the Low preset falling below the 60 FPS threshold. This indicates that the Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in Fivem, regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking does not translate into higher frame rates at this resolution because the GPU is saturated.

The scaling between presets at each resolution further illustrates the GPU's role. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 79.2 FPS, while at 1440p it is 47.8 FPS, and at 4K it is 27.2 FPS. This diminishing gap with increasing resolution shows that as the GPU becomes more stressed, the relative impact of settings changes lessens, because the graphics card is already working near its limit. The CPU, with its 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 20 cores, provides consistent performance across all resolutions, but its contribution is overshadowed by the GPU's limitations at higher pixel counts.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 74.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the best settings preset that maintains playability at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest resolution at which this combo can maintain 60 FPS?

A: The highest resolution with any playable settings is 2560x1440, where the High preset achieves 61.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches 55.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to its closest CPU rival?

A: The i7-14700KF scores 70163 on average benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, a delta of just 0.2%. This makes the two processors essentially equivalent in performance for Fivem.

Q: Is the Arc B580 the limiting factor in this combo?

A: Yes, at 4K resolution the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is not enough to overcome the GPU's 68th percentile ranking, and the frame rates at 3840x2160 fall below 60 FPS on all settings.

Q: What GPU performance level does the Arc B580 match?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080's 23172, making them nearly identical in Fivem performance. The RTX 2080 is 0.6% slower, and the RX 580 2048SP is 0.2% faster.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers 61.6 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 51.1 FPS, which is not playable by the 60 FPS standard.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. On Low settings, the average frame rate is 154.1 FPS, providing a very smooth experience with significant headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings reduce this to 120.9 FPS, still well above playable levels. High settings yield 96.5 FPS, which remains comfortable for most displays. Ultra settings produce 74.9 FPS, which is playable but with less headroom for demanding scenes. This resolution offers the most flexibility, as all four presets clear the 60 FPS bar.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably but remains playable for most settings. Low settings average 98.9 FPS, which is strong for 1440p. Medium settings achieve 82.2 FPS, still comfortably above the threshold. High settings hit 61.6 FPS, just barely maintaining playability. Ultra settings fall to 51.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard and not recommended for smooth gameplay. The data shows that 1440p requires a trade-off between visual quality and frame rate, with High being the highest playable preset.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 55.6 FPS, which is just under the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 42.6 FPS, while High settings yield 33 FPS. Ultra settings produce only 28.4 FPS, which is not a smooth experience. None of the 4K presets reach the 60 FPS target, making this resolution unsuitable for this combo in Fivem. The measured data shows a clear performance ceiling that cannot be overcome by settings adjustments alone.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best settings preset is Ultra, which achieves an average of 74.9 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold, and it provides the highest visual quality available while maintaining smooth performance. The 14.9 FPS of headroom above 60 FPS means that minor frame rate dips in busy scenes should still remain playable, though there is not a large buffer for extreme situations.

For 2560x1440, the best settings preset is High, which delivers 61.6 FPS on average. This is the only preset at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS bar, and it does so with just 1.6 FPS of headroom. This is a tight margin, and players may experience occasional drops below 60 FPS in demanding multiplayer scenarios. The Medium preset at 82.2 FPS offers a more comfortable buffer, but High provides the best visual quality while still meeting the playability standard.

For 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, as even the Low preset averages 55.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict for this resolution is that it is not playable with this combo, and players should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept frame rates below 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 28.4 FPS is far from playable, and the gap between the best 4K result and the playability threshold is 4.4 FPS.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and Intel Arc B580 combo can run Fivem, but only at certain resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable across all presets, with the Ultra setting providing the best experience at 74.9 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for players who want the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the combo is playable on Low, Medium, and High settings, with High being the best choice at 61.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided. At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting, as even the lowest preset achieves only 55.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it has ample performance headroom and can handle even the most demanding settings. For 1440p, it is a viable option with settings compromises, but the tight margin at High settings suggests that players should consider Medium for a more consistent experience. The 4K resolution is out of reach for this hardware, and players with 4K displays will need to run the game at a lower resolution or upgrade the GPU to achieve playable frame rates. Overall, the combo delivers a solid mainstream gaming experience, with the CPU's strength ensuring that future GPU upgrades would yield significant performance gains in Fivem.