Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
353 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
170 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
235 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
114 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
127 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
4.5ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 82 100 127
1440p QHD 114 143 184 235
1080p Full HD 170 224 278 353

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 224
1920x1080 Low 353
1920x1080 Medium 278
1920x1080 Ultra 170
2560x1440 High 143
2560x1440 Low 235
2560x1440 Medium 184
2560x1440 Ultra 114
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 127
3840x2160 Medium 100
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, with every tested resolution and preset clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The data confirms this pairing is overkill for the game, as even the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 60.9 FPS, while lower resolutions reach well beyond 170 FPS at the same settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, benchmark data places the Intel Core i7-14700K at the 94th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 69355. The nearest rivals are extremely close in aggregate performance. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288, representing a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700K. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX achieves 69875, 0.7% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F reaches 69996, 0.9% higher. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, as the differences are well within measurement noise.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080 sits at the 87th percentile of all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 56083. Its nearest rivals show similar clustering. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a 0.6% deficit, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, trailing by 0.7%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% behind at 54828, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE actually leads by 2.2% with a score of 57367. For Fivem specifically, systems built with these alternative GPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable results, though the RTX 5080's slight edge over most rivals matters at the highest settings where the game approaches the 60 FPS boundary.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a workload that scales heavily with resolution, indicating the GPU becomes the dominant factor as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 353.3 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops performance to 234.7 FPS, a reduction of approximately 34%. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls to 126.9 FPS, another 46% decrease from the 1440p figure. This steep scaling pattern demonstrates that rendering resolution directly impacts the GPU workload, while the CPU remains capable of feeding frames at all tested configurations.

The settings presets further clarify the division of labor. At 1080p, the gap between Low (353.3 FPS) and Ultra (170.1 FPS) shows a 52% performance hit from increased graphical complexity, which primarily taxes the GPU. However, even at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate remains far above typical display refresh rates, suggesting the CPU is not the limiting factor. The i7-14700K's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2569, ensures that Fivem's game logic and multiplayer networking do not bottleneck the graphics pipeline.

At 4K resolution, the scaling becomes even more pronounced. The difference between Low (126.9 FPS) and Ultra (60.9 FPS) represents a 52% reduction, confirming that GPU load dominates at higher resolutions. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, but its 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for background processes common in multiplayer scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers outstanding performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 353.3 FPS, Medium reaches 277.9 FPS, High achieves 224.1 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 170.1 FPS. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the combination is far from stressed, with even the most demanding preset leaving substantial performance margin.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptionally high. Low settings average 234.7 FPS, Medium reaches 183.9 FPS, High delivers 143.3 FPS, and Ultra sustains 113.8 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction of roughly 33-37% across settings, which aligns with the increased pixel count of 78% more pixels. The system still clears 100 FPS at maximum settings, making this resolution highly suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve flattens considerably but remains playable at every preset. Low settings average 126.9 FPS, Medium produces 99.6 FPS, High reaches 82.1 FPS, and Ultra dips to 60.9 FPS. The 4K Ultra result sits right at the playability threshold, making it a viable option for players who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 66 FPS, which is less pronounced in absolute terms than at lower resolutions due to the overall lower frame rates.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Fivem, and the data supports a strong affirmative across the entire test matrix. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four settings presets at each of the three tested resolutions clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 60.9 FPS. This means even the most graphically demanding configuration at 4K maintains playable frame rates.

At 2560x1440, all settings are playable, with Ultra achieving 113.8 FPS. This represents a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1440p the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate gaming with maximum visual quality. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, and Ultra produces 170.1 FPS, which is more than sufficient for even the fastest competitive monitors. The system never dips below 60 FPS in any tested configuration, making it an unequivocal recommendation for Fivem.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 60.9 FPS. This is the maximum quality option, and while it leaves only a slim margin above the threshold, it remains technically playable. Players who prefer a buffer for demanding multiplayer scenes might consider High at 82.1 FPS, but the data shows Ultra is viable.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best setting, achieving 113.8 FPS. This provides both maximum visual fidelity and a substantial safety margin over the 60 FPS threshold. The performance headroom suggests that even during intense multiplayer moments with many players on screen, frame rates would likely remain well above playable levels.

At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 170.1 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum quality. The high frame rate ensures smooth gameplay on any display, including 144Hz and 165Hz monitors. The combination of i7-14700K and RTX 5080 at 1080p is so powerful that the game becomes almost trivially easy to run, with no settings combination posing any challenge.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, this pairing ranks 160th, placing it in the top 4.3% of all systems. This high ranking reflects the exceptional capability of both components. The RTX 5080's position at the 87th percentile of all GPUs, combined with the i7-14700K's 94th percentile CPU ranking, creates a system that outpaces the vast majority of tested configurations.

The rank of 160 out of 3707 indicates that while this is a top-tier setup, there are 159 combinations that perform better. These would likely include higher-end GPUs or CPUs that edge out the i7-14700K and RTX 5080 in specific workloads. However, for Fivem specifically, the difference between rank 160 and higher-ranked systems is unlikely to produce meaningful gameplay differences, since even the most demanding preset at 4K achieves 60.9 FPS. The system's percentile rankings suggest it outperforms roughly 96% of all tested combinations, making it an excellent choice for this game.