Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
333 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
163 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
122 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 77 96 122
1440p QHD 107 138 173 219
1080p Full HD 163 210 263 333

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Low 333
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 Ultra 163
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 219
2560x1440 Medium 173
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS in Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combo delivers exactly 60 FPS on average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is the playable threshold for this benchmark.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested hardware configurations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 220th out of 3,707 tested combinations, placing it in the top percentile of systems evaluated for this game.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded at 1080p?

A: With Low settings at 1920x1080, the system reaches 333 FPS on average, which is the highest frame rate recorded across all tested resolutions and settings.

Q: At which resolution does the system fail to hit 60 FPS?

A: The system exceeds 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination tested. Even the most demanding scenario—4K Ultra—averages exactly 60 FPS.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates recorded in the data?

A: The only min FPS values provided are for Medium settings: 82 FPS at 4K, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 223 FPS at 1080p. No min FPS data is listed for High, Low, or Ultra presets.

Q: How large is the gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The average FPS drops from 219 on Low to 107 on Ultra at 2560x1440, a difference of 112 FPS between the two extremes of the settings spectrum.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scoring show that the Intel Core i7-14700K sits in a tight performance cluster. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69,288, a delta of just 0.1% from the i7-14700K's average benchmark score of 69,355. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by a negligible 0.2% with a score of 69,515, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F are 0.7% and 0.9% behind respectively. These processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable CPU-driven performance in Fivem, meaning any of them paired with a comparable GPU should yield nearly identical frame rates.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080's nearest rivals are equally close. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, just 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54,247 average benchmark score. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 2.6%. The AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% behind. For Fivem specifically, the RTX 4080 SUPER would be the most direct substitute—the performance delta is so small that measured FPS would likely be within a frame or two of the RTX 4080's results at every resolution and preset.

For the full combo, users seeking similar behavior could consider the i7-14700K with an RTX 4080 SUPER, or swap the CPU for a Ryzen 9 7950X while keeping the RTX 4080—both changes would produce essentially equivalent gameplay metrics in Fivem.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions and presets in Fivem. At 1080p, the system appears heavily CPU-bound at lower presets: Low settings produce 333 FPS, which drops to 263 at Medium and 210 at High. The GPU has headroom to render far more frames than the CPU can feed at Low settings, suggesting the processor is the limiting factor at this resolution.

As resolution climbs to 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. Low settings still hit 219 FPS, but the gap between Low and Ultra narrows proportionally—from a 123 FPS difference at 1080p to a 112 FPS difference at 1440p. This trend continues at 4K, where Low averages 122 FPS and Ultra drops to 60 FPS, a 62 FPS spread. The diminishing frame rate ceiling at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is becoming the primary constraint.

The scaling pattern across presets tells a similar story. At 4K, moving from Medium (96 FPS) to High (77 FPS) costs 19 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 17 FPS. At 1440p, the Medium-to-High step costs 35 FPS and High-to-Ultra costs 31 FPS. At 1080p, those same steps cost 53 FPS and 47 FPS respectively. The larger absolute drops at lower resolutions suggest the CPU can still keep up with GPU demand, and the bottleneck shifts more toward the graphics card as resolution increases.

For Fivem specifically, the data implies that at 1080p and 1440p, the i7-14700K's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample processing power, and the RTX 4080's rendering throughput becomes the deciding factor for Ultra settings. At 4K, GPU load dominates entirely—the RTX 4080 with its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth is clearly the component determining whether the game stays above the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Fivem, and it does so with authority at every resolution tested. The verdict data marks all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—as playable at all three resolutions. The 60 FPS threshold is cleared even in the most demanding configuration: 4K Ultra averages exactly 60 FPS, meeting the playability criterion precisely.

At 1440p, the system delivers 107 FPS on Ultra, providing a substantial cushion above the threshold. The 1080p Ultra result of 163 FPS means players with high-refresh-rate monitors can enjoy maximum quality without sacrificing smoothness. For users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, the 1080p Low setting at 333 FPS and 1440p Low at 219 FPS demonstrate the system's ability to push extremely high frame rates in competitive multiplayer scenarios.

The only caveat is 4K Ultra, where the average sits precisely at 60 FPS. While this meets the playable threshold, there is no margin for demanding scenes or drops. The Medium preset at 4K (96 FPS) offers a safer buffer for those who want 4K with headroom.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the maximum quality option available in the data, and it meets the threshold. Players wanting more safety margin could drop to High at 77 FPS or Medium at 96 FPS, but Ultra is technically playable.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, delivering 107 FPS on average. This provides both excellent visual quality and a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS line, making it the recommended configuration for 1440p displays.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 163 FPS, which is not only playable but also fast enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. This is the optimal preset for 1080p, offering the full visual experience while maintaining triple-digit frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 220th out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in roughly the top 6% of all configurations evaluated. This is a strong showing for a mainstream enthusiast pairing, particularly given the game's multiplayer nature where CPU performance often matters more than in single-player titles.

The rank reflects the balanced nature of this setup. The CPU's 94th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 86th percentile among all graphics cards combine to produce a system that excels in Fivem's mixed CPU/GPU workload. The 220th position out of 3,707 means the vast majority of tested systems—3,487 of them—deliver worse performance in this specific game.

The ranking also contextualizes the 4K Ultra result of exactly 60 FPS. While this is playable, the combo's position suggests there are 219 configurations that perform better, likely featuring higher-tier GPUs or CPUs that can maintain higher frame rates at maximum 4K settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K):

  • Low: 122 FPS average
  • Medium: 96 FPS average, 82 FPS minimum, 110 FPS maximum
  • High: 77 FPS average
  • Ultra: 60 FPS average

The 4K progression shows a steady decline from Low to Ultra, with each preset step costing roughly 15-19 FPS. The Medium preset's min-max range of 82-110 FPS indicates reasonable frame pacing, though the 28 FPS spread suggests some scene-dependent variability.

2560x1440 (1440p):

  • Low: 219 FPS average
  • Medium: 173 FPS average, 147 FPS minimum, 199 FPS maximum
  • High: 138 FPS average
  • Ultra: 107 FPS average

At 1440p, the system demonstrates strong performance across all presets. The Medium preset shows a 52 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, larger than at 4K, which may reflect more CPU-driven frame spikes at this resolution where the GPU is less of a bottleneck.

1920x1080 (1080p):

  • Low: 333 FPS average
  • Medium: 263 FPS average, 223 FPS minimum, 302 FPS maximum
  • High: 210 FPS average
  • Ultra: 163 FPS average

The 1080p results reveal the system's peak capabilities. The Low preset's 333 FPS average represents the absolute ceiling of this configuration in Fivem. The Medium preset's 79 FPS min-max spread is the widest recorded, indicating significant frame rate variation during gameplay at this resolution and preset combination.