Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
289 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
142 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
187 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
91 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
51 FPS
5.4ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 65 81 106
1440p QHD 91 122 148 187
1080p Full HD 142 185 227 289

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 185
1920x1080 Low 289
1920x1080 Medium 227
1920x1080 Ultra 142
2560x1440 High 122
2560x1440 Low 187
2560x1440 Medium 148
2560x1440 Ultra 91
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Low 106
3840x2160 Medium 81
3840x2160 Ultra 51

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a robust Fivem experience, with benchmark data showing the CPU and GPU each occupying a distinct performance tier. The processor sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, making this a high-end pairing where the CPU holds a slight edge in relative standing. This configuration is well-matched for Fivem, as the data indicates the system can push well beyond standard refresh rates at most settings, though the most demanding 4K Ultra preset will challenge the frame rate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700K’s average benchmark score of 69355 places it in a tight cluster of competitors. The AMD EPYC 9115 sits nearly identical with a score of 69288, a mere 0.1% behind, meaning users would see virtually no difference in Fivem performance between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is the direct rival, scoring 69515, which is 0.2% ahead of the i7-14700K; this margin is negligible in real-world gameplay. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F are also close, with scores of 69875 and 69996 respectively, putting them 0.7% and 0.9% ahead. For Fivem, any of these chips would deliver essentially interchangeable frame rates, as the differences are well below the threshold of perceptible variance.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s average score of 43223 is flanked by some surprising entries. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, just 0.1% higher, making it a theoretical equivalent in raw compute, although its workstation pedigree would not offer the same feature set for gaming. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile matches closely at 43268, also 0.1% ahead, while the standard Quadro M6000 trails slightly at 43301, which is 0.2% ahead of the 4070 SUPER. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the closest high-end rival, scoring 43667, a 1% advantage. In Fivem, the RTX 4070 SUPER would behave almost identically to these alternatives, with the 1% gap to the mobile 4090 representing a negligible difference of a few frames per second at most resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance of CPU and GPU load shifts across resolutions in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound, as evidenced by the massive frame rates: the Low preset hits 289.4 FPS, Medium reaches 226.8 FPS, and High achieves 185.2 FPS. These numbers are so high that the GPU is likely idling in many scenes, with the i7-14700K’s strong single-thread performance (a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160) driving the engine’s simulation logic. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop of 147.5 FPS (from 289.4 to 141.9), which is a 51% reduction, indicating that as settings increase, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility but the CPU still maintains a commanding lead.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more prominent. The Low preset still delivers 187.3 FPS, but the gap between settings narrows in percentage terms: Ultra drops to 90.6 FPS, a 51.7% reduction from Low. This pattern continues at 3840x2160, where the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. At 4K Low, the system produces 105.9 FPS, but Ultra falls to 51.4 FPS, a 51.5% reduction. The fact that 4K High (65.4 FPS) is nearly double the frame rate of 4K Ultra (51.4 FPS) demonstrates that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily at this resolution. The CPU’s influence wanes as resolution increases, with the data showing that the i7-14700K can feed the GPU efficiently at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU’s raw throughput (35.48 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the primary determinant of performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4070 SUPER paired with the i7-14700K delivers exceptional performance across all presets. The Low setting produces an average of 289.4 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. Medium settings yield 226.8 FPS, while High drops to 185.2 FPS. The Ultra preset still manages a very smooth 141.9 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 51% performance hit, but even the lowest number here is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. Low settings achieve 187.3 FPS, Medium follows at 147.6 FPS, and High reaches 122 FPS. Ultra settings still deliver 90.6 FPS, which is comfortably above 60 FPS and provides a great balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. The drop from Low to Ultra is 51.7%, slightly steeper than at 1080p, reflecting the increased GPU load at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes more variable. Low settings run at 105.9 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings drop to 80.7 FPS, and High settings fall to 65.4 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset, however, drops to 51.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold and would result in noticeable stuttering in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is 14 FPS, a 21.4% reduction, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional effects are particularly demanding on the GPU’s memory bandwidth.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 653rd out of 3707 combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 17.6% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing given the game’s popularity and the wide variety of hardware configurations in the dataset. The high rank is largely attributable to the CPU’s excellent multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5) and the GPU’s solid 4K capabilities, though the 4K Ultra result prevents the combo from climbing higher. For comparison, the GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 4090 Mobile, would likely push this combo higher in the rankings, but the 4070 SUPER’s desktop-class performance at 1440p and below ensures it remains competitive against most other pairings.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem, and it does so exceptionally well at most settings. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal: all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the best setting being Ultra at 141.9 FPS average. At 2560x1440, the system again clears 60 FPS on all presets, with Ultra achieving 90.6 FPS, making it the optimal resolution for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. The playable settings include High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable option at 65.4 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 51.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold, so users targeting 4K should stick to High settings for a consistently smooth experience. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo is overkill in the best way, delivering frame rates that will satisfy even the most demanding esports players, while 4K users will need to make a modest settings sacrifice to maintain fluidity.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo at 2560x1440?

A: The data shows that Ultra settings at 1440p achieve an average of 90.6 FPS, which is the best playable setting. All presets at this resolution exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality while remaining well above the playable threshold.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the High preset runs at 65.4 FPS average, which is playable. Low and Medium also work, at 105.9 and 80.7 FPS respectively. However, the Ultra preset drops to 51.4 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold, so 4K users should avoid Ultra settings.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile in this game?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, while the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is 1% higher. In Fivem, this translates to a negligible difference of a few frames per second, so the 4070 SUPER is effectively on par with the mobile 4090 for this title.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700K a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER in Fivem?

A: At 1920x1080, the frame rates (185.2 FPS on High, 141.9 FPS on Ultra) suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU without bottlenecking. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as indicated by the steeper performance drops at higher settings, so the CPU is not a concern.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 289.4, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is far above any display refresh rate currently available, indicating the system is massively overqualified for low-settings 1080p play.

Q: How many total system combinations does this setup rank against?

A: This combo ranks 653rd out of 3707 tested combinations in the database. This places it in the top 17.6% of all systems tested for Fivem, reflecting its strong overall performance.