Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 42 | 57 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 79 | 98 | 123 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 121 | 147 | 189 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination was tested in Fivem, a multiplayer title. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile of all graphics cards. Measured frame rates span three resolutions and four presets, revealing a system that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p, but only reaches that bar at 4K with the Low preset. The launch MSRP is $409 for the CPU and 299 USD for the GPU.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The i7-14700K's average benchmark score is 69355. Its closest rivals are the AMD EPYC 9115 (avgScore 69288, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avgScore 69515, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avgScore 69875, deltaPct -0.7), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (avgScore 69996, deltaPct -0.9). These deltaPct values are all within one percentage point, meaning that in general compute workloads these CPUs will behave nearly identically. For a multiplayer title like Fivem, the i7-14700K's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for the simulation and network overhead, and the data confirms that the CPU is not the limiting factor at the tested settings.
The RTX 4060's average benchmark score is 17639. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (avgScore 17666, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Radeon 780M (avgScore 17588, deltaPct 0.3), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (avgScore 17551, deltaPct 0.5), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (avgScore 17509, deltaPct 0.7). The deltaPct values are again under one percent, meaning a user swapping the RTX 4060 for any of these would see almost identical frame rates in Fivem. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width are the 4060's defining features, but the benchmark similarity to these older AMD parts shows that raw performance is the key factor at 1080p and 1440p.
CPU and GPU Roles
The frame rate scaling across resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS goes from 189.3 (Low) down to 94.2 (Ultra). At 2560x1440, it ranges from 122.5 (Low) to 62.7 (Ultra). At 3840x2160, the range is 69.8 (Low) to 34.1 (Ultra). The pattern is consistent: each resolution step down from 1080p to 1440p to 4K roughly halves the average FPS at the same preset. For example, at Ultra, 94.2 at 1080p becomes 62.7 at 1440p and 34.1 at 4K. This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the shading load increases with pixel count.
The CPU, by contrast, is highly capable. Its single-core performance, as reflected in the benchmark scores, is sufficient to push 189.3 FPS at 1080p Low, which is far above the playable threshold. In a multiplayer environment, the CPU may be stressed by many player entities, but the measured FPS does not show a CPU bottleneck at these resolutions and presets. The percentile difference — 94th for the CPU, 61st for the GPU — reinforces that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing. At 4K, even the Low preset only reaches 69.8 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 34.1, so the GPU is clearly the component that determines whether the game is playable at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table lists all measured average FPS values. Minimum and maximum frame times were not recorded for this combination.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|------------|----------|---------|
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 122.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 98.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 62.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 120.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 189.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 147.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 94.2 |
The spread between Low and Ultra is consistent across resolutions. At 1080p, the difference is 95.1 FPS (189.3 – 94.2); at 1440p, it is 59.8 FPS (122.5 – 62.7); at 4K, it is 35.7 FPS (69.8 – 34.1). The proportional gap narrows as resolution increases, which again points to the GPU being the bottleneck at higher pixel counts. The 1080p Low result of 189.3 FPS is the only measurement that approaches 200 FPS, and it shows the CPU is far from being a limiting factor at that resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1981st out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem. That places it in the lower half of the field, but the absolute frame rates tell a more nuanced story. The rank is a relative measure across all combos, and many faster combinations exist. However, the measured FPS numbers show that the system still delivers smooth gameplay at the most common resolutions. The combination is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from the bottom — it sits just past the midpoint, meaning roughly half of all tested configurations deliver higher average FPS in this game. The data does not include the specific FPS of the combos above and below it, so the rank is best understood as a general indicator of where this hardware sits in the broader ecosystem.
The Verdict
According to the verdictByResolution data, this PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS or higher under the following conditions. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, with an average of 69.8 FPS. The High, Medium, and Ultra presets at 4K fall to 41.8, 56.5, and 34.1 FPS respectively, all below the threshold. At 2560x1440, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 62.7 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, and the Ultra preset averages 94.2 FPS. Thus, the system is fully capable at 1080p and 1440p, and at 4K it requires Low settings to remain playable. The data shows a clear line: the GPU is strong enough for 1440p Ultra and 1080p Ultra, but not for 4K Ultra.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 1920x1080?
A: The Ultra preset runs at an average of 94.2 FPS, which is the highest setting and still well above 60 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?
A: Only with the Low preset, which averages 69.8 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i7-14700K is within 0.1% of the AMD EPYC 9115 and within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, so it performs almost identically to those processors.
Q: How does the GPU compare to similar cards?
A: The RTX 4060 is within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon 780M, meaning frame rates in Fivem would be nearly the same with those GPUs.
Q: Is 2560x1440 Ultra playable?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 1440p averages 62.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 Medium?
A: The Medium preset at 1080p averages 147.4 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
The table below lists the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS at each resolution, based on the measured average FPS.
| Resolution | Best Settings | Avg FPS |
|------------|---------------|---------|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 62.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 94.2 |
At 4K, the Low preset is the only option that clears the playable threshold. At 1440p and 1080p, the Ultra preset is the best choice, with 1440p Ultra just above 60 FPS and 1080p Ultra providing a comfortable margin of 34 FPS over the threshold.