Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a fundamentally playable Fivem experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. The data shows that this combination is best suited for 1920x1080, where every preset, including Ultra, clears the playable threshold, while 2560x1440 offers a solid Medium preset at 71 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS even on Low, indicating a hard performance ceiling for this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo reveal a clear performance hierarchy tied to resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 136 FPS, which is the highest average recorded in the entire dataset. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 107 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 86 FPS, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration, still manages an average of 67 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo has ample headroom, with even the heaviest settings staying comfortably above the playable threshold.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance takes a significant hit but remains playable at lower settings. The Low preset produces an average of 89 FPS, which is still a very fluid experience. The Medium preset follows with an average of 71 FPS, and the data shows a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS, meaning the system is just barely holding onto the playable threshold at its lowest point. The High preset drops to an average of 56 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset is the weakest performer at this resolution, with an average of 44 FPS, indicating a substantial performance penalty for the highest visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates on any setting. The Low preset achieves an average of 50 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution but still 10 FPS short of the target. The Medium preset drops to an average of 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS, highlighting the significant variance under load. The High preset manages an average of 31 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to an average of 24 FPS. These figures demonstrate that 4K is beyond the capability of this hardware combination for Fivem, as even the lowest settings cannot reach the playable threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the scaling between resolutions and presets reveals the respective roles of the Intel Core i7-14700K and the Intel Arc B570 in this game. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is a high-end desktop part that ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its performance is substantial, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and a single-core score of 2160. This computational strength suggests that the processor is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, especially given that Fivem is a multiplayer title that often relies on server-side logic but still requires solid single-thread performance for client-side simulation.

The GPU, on the other hand, ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, which is a more modest standing. The Arc B570 has 2304 shading units and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. Its compute capability is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32. The performance scaling across resolutions strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate drops are more pronounced when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, the average FPS at Ultra settings drops from 67 at 1080p to 44 at 1440p, a 34% reduction, and then to 24 at 4K, a further 45% reduction. This steep decline indicates that the graphics card's rendering throughput is the primary constraint as pixel count increases.

The impact of the CPU becomes more apparent when looking at the preset scaling at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 69 FPS (from 136 to 67), which shows that the GPU is doing significantly more work at higher presets. However, the fact that the system still maintains 67 FPS at Ultra suggests that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's demands even at the highest settings. At 1440p, the spread between Low and Ultra is 45 FPS (from 89 to 44), and at 4K, it is 26 FPS (from 50 to 24). The narrowing spread at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU is becoming the dominant bottleneck, as the CPU has more time to prepare frames while the GPU struggles to render them. In essence, the i7-14700K provides a robust foundation, but the Arc B570 dictates the playable limits for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data, the best settings for each resolution are defined as the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. For 1920x1080, the optimal choice is the Ultra preset, which delivers an average of 67 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the system handles it without dropping below the playable threshold, making it the clear recommendation for the best visual experience at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are the Medium preset, which achieves an average of 71 FPS. While the High preset is visually superior, its average of 56 FPS falls below the 60 FPS target, making Medium the highest playable option. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 60 confirms that the experience remains smooth even during demanding scenes, providing a good balance between visual fidelity and performance.

For 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, as even the Low preset only reaches an average of 50 FPS. The verdict data explicitly lists no playable settings for this resolution, with a null best settings value. This means that users seeking a 60 FPS experience at 4K will need to consider lower resolutions or more powerful hardware, as this combo cannot achieve the target on any setting.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the playable resolutions are strictly limited to 1080p and 1440p. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, all four presets—High, Low, Medium, and Ultra—are playable, with the Ultra preset delivering an average of 67 FPS. This makes 1080p the definitive resolution for this combo, offering the full range of visual options without compromising the 60 FPS experience. At 2560x1440, the system is partially playable, with the Low and Medium presets clearing the threshold at 89 FPS and 71 FPS, respectively. The High and Ultra presets are not viable, as they fall to 56 FPS and 44 FPS. For 3840x2160, the verdict is unequivocal: the system is not playable at any setting, with the best average being 50 FPS on Low. The data indicates that this combination is a solid 1080p performer and a capable 1440p option at medium quality, but it is not a 4K solution for Fivem.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700K provide context for its performance level. The AMD EPYC 9115 has an average benchmark score of 69288, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-14700K’s average of 69355, making them essentially equivalent in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, a 0.2% difference, placing it in the same performance tier. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F score 69875 and 69996, respectively, showing deltas of -0.7% and -0.9%, meaning they are slightly faster but still within a negligible margin. For gaming, any of these CPUs would likely deliver very similar frame rates when paired with the same GPU, as the differences in average benchmark scores are minimal.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which has an average score of 20534, a 0.1% delta from the Arc B570’s 20556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a -0.1% delta, indicating a near-identical performance profile. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X also fall within a tight range, with deltas of 0.4% and -0.5%, respectively. In practical terms, swapping the Arc B570 for any of these GPUs would produce almost indistinguishable FPS results in Fivem, as their aggregate benchmark scores are statistically tied. Users with any of these alternative parts can expect a similar gaming experience, with the same resolution and settings limitations.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700K and Intel Arc B570 ranks at position 2980 out of 3707 total combos. This places it in the lower half of the ranking table, roughly in the 20th percentile of tested systems. The rank reflects the GPU’s limitations more than the CPU’s strength, as the i7-14700K is a high-end processor that scores in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The combo’s position suggests that while the CPU is capable of driving higher frame rates, the Arc B570 holds the system back, particularly at higher resolutions. The data shows that this is not a top-tier gaming setup for Fivem, but it is sufficient for mainstream 1080p gaming and acceptable 1440p play at medium settings. The ranking serves as a warning that for users prioritizing high-refresh-rate or 4K gaming, this specific CPU-GPU pairing will not meet those demands, and more powerful GPU options would be necessary to climb the performance ladder.