Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a benchmark profile for Fivem that is defined by high average frame rates across all tested resolutions, with the primary constraint emerging only at 4K Ultra settings. Measured data indicates that the combination is capable of exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold in most configurations, making it a versatile option for multiplayer sessions where frame consistency matters. The CPU, a 20-core Raptor Lake-R part with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, holds a percentile rank of 91 among all tested CPUs, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4070 with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This pairing produces a combo rank of 851 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top quarter of all systems evaluated for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows its highest performance ceiling. With Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 260 FPS, which is the maximum recorded across all tested configurations. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 205 FPS, with a minimum of 175 FPS and a maximum of 236 FPS. High settings produce an average of 164 FPS, while Ultra settings still deliver a robust 128 FPS average. These numbers indicate that even at the highest preset, the system maintains a frame rate more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold, leaving substantial headroom for background tasks or streaming.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably but remains consistently strong. Low settings yield an average of 171 FPS, while Medium settings average 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. High settings average 108 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 84 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 87 FPS, demonstrating a clear but manageable performance cost for higher visual fidelity. The minimum recorded frame rate at Medium settings is still nearly double the playable threshold, indicating smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the system faces its most challenging conditions. Low settings average 95 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 86 FPS, meaning even the lowest recorded frame rate stays above 60 FPS. High settings average exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold but leaves no margin for dips. Ultra settings fall below the threshold, averaging 47 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire data set that fails to reach playable performance. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 48 FPS drop, highlighting the significant GPU load at this resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores provide context for its processing capability. The Intel Xeon 6505P has an average score of 53701, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700F's score of 53620. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, a 0.3% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, coming in 0.6% lower. The AMD EPYC 7313P rounds out the group with a score of 53206, a 0.8% gap. These margins are all within 1% of each other, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in CPU-bound scenarios within Fivem. The practical implication is that users upgrading from any of these processors would see negligible frame rate changes in this game, as the game's engine does not appear to be heavily reliant on multi-core scaling beyond this performance tier.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with an average score of 37628, a 0.1% difference from the RTX 4070's 37648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a 0.4% gap, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% difference. These delta values are small enough that in practical gaming terms, the frame rates at each resolution and preset would be nearly indistinguishable. A system with the RTX 4080 Mobile might see a marginal improvement in the 4K Ultra scenario, but the difference would likely be within the margin of error for typical gameplay variation. The Tesla P4 and RX Vega 56, despite being older architectures, are close enough in aggregate score that they would produce similar FPS numbers in Fivem's measured scenarios.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 260 FPS on Low settings, which is a frame rate that typically indicates CPU-bound behavior. The CPU's single-thread score of 4257 on Passmark and its 91st percentile ranking suggest it has ample headroom for high refresh rate gaming. However, the GPU still contributes significantly, as evidenced by the drop from 260 FPS on Low to 128 FPS on Ultra, a 132 FPS reduction that shows the GPU's rendering load increasing with preset complexity.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The average frame rate on Low settings is 171 FPS, which is 89 FPS lower than at 1080p, indicating that the increased pixel count is taxing the GPU more heavily. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 87 FPS, a similar magnitude to the 1080p drop, but the absolute values are lower. This suggests that while the CPU still has enough processing power to feed the GPU at this resolution, the GPU is becoming the limiting factor in terms of raw pixel throughput.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. The average frame rate on Low settings falls to 95 FPS, which is only 76 FPS higher than the Ultra setting's 47 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 48 FPS drop, but the absolute performance is constrained by the GPU's memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s and its 64 ROPs. The CPU, with its 28 threads and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, is unlikely to be the bottleneck at this resolution, as the frame rates are primarily limited by the GPU's pixel fill rate and shader throughput. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU determines whether the system stays above 60 FPS, while at 1080p and 1440p, both components contribute to the final frame rate, with the CPU providing the upper ceiling and the GPU modulating the impact of preset changes.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at playable frame rates across all but one tested configuration. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the most demanding Ultra preset averaging 128 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets also remain playable, with Ultra averaging 84 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system maintains playable performance on Low, Medium, and High settings, with High averaging exactly 60 FPS to meet the threshold. The only configuration that fails to reach 60 FPS is 4K Ultra, which averages 47 FPS and falls below the playable threshold. For users prioritizing visual fidelity at 4K, this means accepting either a lower preset or a frame rate below the standard playable threshold. For the vast majority of gaming scenarios, particularly at 1080p and 1440p, this system provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, making it suitable for competitive play where frame consistency is critical.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 128 FPS. This preset provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a frame rate that is more than double the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 84 FPS, which still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable 24 FPS. At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This configuration meets the threshold precisely, but users seeking additional headroom could opt for Medium settings, which average 75 FPS and provide a minimum of 64 FPS, offering a safety margin for demanding scenes. For maximum frame rates at 4K, Low settings average 95 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visual fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this system achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average frame rate is 260 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system averages 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this system?

A: The minimum frame rate recorded is 64 FPS, observed at 3840x2160 with Medium settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53288.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 holds a percentile rank of 81 among all tested GPUs.

Q: Which resolution shows the largest performance drop between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080, the drop from Low (260 FPS) to Ultra (128 FPS) is 132 FPS, which is the largest absolute difference across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 851 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 23% of all systems evaluated. This rank reflects the system's ability to deliver playable frame rates across most configurations, with the primary limitation being 4K Ultra settings. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 81st percentile ranking both contribute to this overall position. The system's performance profile shows that it excels at 1080p and 1440p, where it can push frame rates well beyond the playable threshold, and remains capable at 4K with adjusted settings. The rank indicates that while there are faster combinations available, this pairing offers a balanced performance level that handles Fivem's multiplayer environments with consistent frame rates, particularly at the resolutions most commonly used by gamers.