Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
190 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
91 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
63 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
72 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 44 54 72
1440p QHD 63 77 101 123
1080p Full HD 91 117 152 190

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 117
1920x1080 Low 190
1920x1080 Medium 152
1920x1080 Ultra 91
2560x1440 High 77
2560x1440 Low 123
2560x1440 Medium 101
2560x1440 Ultra 63
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 72
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Fivem is a multiplayer modification platform that places heavy demands on both processor and graphics hardware, and the combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 produces a wide spread of results depending on resolution and preset. The data shows a system that can deliver well over 100 FPS at 1080p in less demanding settings, yet struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K with higher visual fidelity. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares the hardware against its nearest rivals, and identifies the optimal settings for a smooth experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. The nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database are extremely close in aggregate performance. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, which is just 0.2% higher than the i7-14700F, making it a statistically identical performer for gaming workloads. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 trails by a negligible 0.3% with a score of 53469, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X comes in 0.6% higher at 53288. The AMD EPYC 7313P completes the group at 0.8% higher with a score of 53206. For Fivem, any of these processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates, meaning the i7-14700F’s 20 cores and 28 threads are more than sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are an eclectic mix of older and integrated solutions. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics trail by 0.3% at 17588. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 round out the list with scores of 17551 and 17509, representing 0.5% and 0.7% deltas, respectively. This clustering indicates that the RTX 4060’s raw compute performance is comparable to these alternatives, though the modern Ada Lovelace architecture brings features like ray tracing and DLSS that the older rivals lack. In practice, Fivem’s performance will be governed more by the GPU’s memory bandwidth and shading power, and the data shows this card is positioned in a mid-range tier where small benchmark deltas translate to only a few frames per second in real-world gameplay.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data for Fivem reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions, with the CPU playing a larger role as resolution drops. At 3840x2160, the frame rate drops sharply when moving from Low to Ultra settings, indicating that the RTX 4060’s rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The average FPS at 4K ranges from 71.6 on Low down to 35.3 on Ultra, a spread of 36.3 FPS that is entirely attributable to graphics load. This suggests that the i7-14700F has ample headroom to feed the GPU even at 4K, as the frame rates scale almost exclusively with preset changes.

At 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more moderate. The Low preset produces 122.9 FPS, while Ultra drops to 62.5 FPS, a difference of 60.4 FPS. The fact that Ultra still clears 60 FPS indicates that the GPU is not completely overwhelmed, but the 49% reduction from Low to Ultra shows that graphics settings have a dominant impact. At 1920x1080, the pattern shifts slightly. Low hits 189.5 FPS, Medium reaches 152.1 FPS, High manages 117.2 FPS, and Ultra stays at 91.1 FPS. The spread here is 98.4 FPS, but even the most demanding preset remains well above the playable threshold. The CPU’s role becomes more apparent at this resolution, as the higher frame rates require the i7-14700F to process more draw calls and physics updates, but the benchmark results show no signs of a CPU bottleneck given the consistent frame delivery.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across all three resolutions and four presets. At 3840x2160, the averages are as follows: Low delivers 71.6 FPS, Medium drops to 53.9 FPS, High falls further to 44.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35.3 FPS. None of the 4K presets except Low clear the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even that margin is slim. The gap between Low and Medium is 17.7 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High is 9.5 FPS, and High to Ultra is another 9.1 FPS. This suggests that Fivem’s 4K Ultra settings impose a heavy shading and texture load that the RTX 4060’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results improve substantially. Low averages 122.9 FPS, Medium hits 101.0 FPS, High achieves 76.6 FPS, and Ultra settles at 62.5 FPS. This resolution offers a much better balance, with every preset clearing 60 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 21.9 FPS, Medium to High costs 24.4 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 14.1 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result of 62.5 FPS is just above the playable threshold, indicating that this is the upper limit for a smooth experience on this hardware.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strength. Low produces 189.5 FPS, Medium reaches 152.1 FPS, High manages 117.2 FPS, and Ultra stays at 91.1 FPS. The frame rates are consistently high, with even the most demanding preset nearly 50% above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 51.9% reduction in average FPS, but the absolute numbers remain impressive for a mid-range GPU. It is notably the min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies solely on averages, which can mask occasional stutters or frame drops.

The Verdict

Based on the verdictByResolution data, this PC can run Fivem, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, with an average FPS of 71.6. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 53.9, 44.4, and 35.3, respectively. Players targeting 4K would be forced to sacrifice visual quality substantially to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is much more favorable. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear 60 FPS, with averages of 122.9, 101.0, 76.6, and 62.5, respectively. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for this combination, allowing players to use the Ultra preset at 62.5 FPS, which is above the playable threshold but with little headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios. The 1920x1080 resolution is the most comfortable, with all presets exceeding 90 FPS. Ultra averages 91.1 FPS, High hits 117.2 FPS, Medium reaches 152.1 FPS, and Low tops out at 189.5 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, 1080p is clearly the best choice.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1975 out of 3707 combos. This places it in the 53rd percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly half of the configurations in the database outperform it and half underperform. Given that the i7-14700F is a high-end processor in the 91st percentile of CPUs, the ranking is held back primarily by the RTX 4060, which sits in the 61st percentile of GPUs. The 1975th rank suggests that while this combo is capable of running Fivem at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, it is not a top-tier configuration. Systems with more powerful GPUs would achieve higher frame rates at 4K or maintain higher presets at 1440p, but this pairing represents a balanced mid-range option that avoids severe bottlenecks. The rank of 1975 out of 3707 indicates that there is a substantial number of faster combos, but also a large group of slower ones, making this a solid middle-of-the-pack choice for Fivem.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for maintaining at least 60 FPS are derived from the measured FPS data and the verdictByResolution field. At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, which delivers an average FPS of 71.6. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 4K, but it comes with a significant visual compromise. The Medium preset at 53.9 FPS and High at 44.4 FPS are not viable for smooth gameplay, and Ultra at 35.3 FPS is far below the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Ultra, which achieves an average FPS of 62.5. This is the highest quality setting that clears 60 FPS, and it allows players to enjoy the full visual fidelity of Fivem at this resolution. The margin above the threshold is only 2.5 FPS, so players who prioritize consistency over maximum quality might prefer High at 76.6 FPS for extra headroom. At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is also Ultra, with an average FPS of 91.1. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold and represents the best possible visual experience for this hardware. All lower presets — High at 117.2 FPS, Medium at 152.1 FPS, and Low at 189.5 FPS — also clear 60 FPS, but Ultra offers the highest fidelity without sacrificing playability.