Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
126 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
82 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
6.2ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 41,187

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 59 73 92
1440p QHD 82 108 135 172
1080p Full HD 126 161 207 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 207
1920x1080 Ultra 126
2560x1440 High 108
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 82
3840x2160 High 59
3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a high-performance foundation for Fivem, a multiplayer title that scales strongly across resolutions and presets. Measured data shows this combo can push well past 60 FPS at 1440p and 1080p, while 4K requires a dialing back of settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The benchmark results below break down exactly what to expect from this configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combo delivers an average of 59.4 FPS on High settings, which sits just under the 60 FPS playability threshold. Dropping to Medium yields 72.7 FPS average, while Low settings produce 91.6 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the only option that falls below playable levels, with an average of 44.5 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance becomes more comfortable across all presets. The Ultra preset averages 81.5 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with decent headroom. High settings average 107.5 FPS, Medium averages 135.4 FPS, and Low reaches 171.6 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is substantial, with the High preset jumping from 59.4 to 107.5 FPS, a gain of roughly 81%.

At 1920x1080, the combo becomes exceptionally capable. The Ultra preset averages 125.9 FPS, which is more than double the 4K Ultra result. High settings average 160.5 FPS, Medium averages 207 FPS, and Low reaches 258.3 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 132.4 FPS, indicating that the GPU has significant headroom even at the highest settings.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step down roughly doubles the frame rate headroom. The gap between Medium and High is relatively modest across all resolutions, while the jump from Ultra to High is more pronounced, suggesting that Ultra settings carry a heavy rendering cost.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The RTX 3080 Ti is a 12 GB GDDR6X card with 10240 shading units and a 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, ranking in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Both components are strong, but their relative influence shifts depending on resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The frame rate drops from 91.6 at Low to 44.5 at Ultra, a 47.4 FPS swing that is driven almost entirely by GPU workload. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the fact that even the Low preset, which reduces GPU load, does not produce absurdly high frame rates that would indicate a CPU bottleneck.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The Ultra preset averages 81.5 FPS, and the Low preset hits 171.6 FPS. The scaling between presets is still steep, indicating GPU-bound behavior, but the higher frame rates suggest the CPU is beginning to contribute more meaningfully. The jump from Low to Medium is 36.2 FPS, which is a larger absolute delta than the 4K equivalent, confirming that the GPU has more room to stretch.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes a more significant factor. The Low preset averages 258.3 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 125.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 132.4 FPS, which is the largest absolute spread across all resolutions. At this resolution, even the Ultra preset produces enough frame rate for the CPU to matter in multiplayer scenarios, where physics and entity updates can create spikes in CPU demand. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration of the i7-14700F provides ample parallel capacity for such workloads.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 72.7 FPS. The High preset falls just short at 59.4 FPS, so Medium is the recommended ceiling for consistent playability. Ultra at 44.5 FPS is not viable, and Low at 91.6 FPS is the fallback for higher refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 81.5 FPS. This is the best-case scenario for the combo, as it allows the highest settings while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. High at 107.5 FPS, Medium at 135.4 FPS, and Low at 171.6 FPS all provide additional headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 125.9 FPS. This is a strong result, as it means the combo can run the game with all settings maxed out and still deliver more than double the playability threshold. High at 160.5 FPS, Medium at 207 FPS, and Low at 258.3 FPS are all options for users with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701 and a delta of -0.2% relative to the i7-14700F's 53620. This means the Xeon 6505P is essentially identical in performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% slower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, which is 0.8% slower. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% faster. For Fivem, any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates, as the differences are within the margin of measurement error.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with an average score of 40870, which is 0.8% slower than the RTX 3080 Ti's 41187. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41707, which is 1.2% faster, and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 scores 41897, which is 1.7% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377, which is 2% slower. These deltas are small, meaning that swapping the GPU for any of these alternatives would result in very similar FPS in Fivem, with the Tesla M40 variants being marginally faster and the RTX 5070 being marginally slower.

In practical terms, the combo's performance profile is well established. A user upgrading from the RTX 5070 to the RTX 3080 Ti would see roughly a 2% improvement in GPU-bound scenarios, while a move to the Tesla M40 24 GB would yield about 1.2% more performance. CPU-side, the differences are even smaller, with the largest delta being 0.8% between the i7-14700F and the EPYC 7313P.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 1005 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 27% of all tested systems, which is a solid result given the high bar set by the most extreme hardware configurations. The percentile ranking for the CPU is 91, and for the GPU it is 83, so the combo benefits from a strong processor that outpaces the graphics card in relative terms.

The rank of 1005 suggests that there are many combos with faster GPUs, such as RTX 40-series cards, or faster CPUs, such as the Ryzen 9 7900X, that would place higher. However, the fact that this combo sits above 2700 other tested systems indicates that it is well above the median. For a 14th-gen Core i7 and a 30-series flagship, this rank is indicative of a balanced system that can handle Fivem at high settings without compromise.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, this PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS or above across most resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 125.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear the threshold, with Ultra averaging 81.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium averaging 72.7 FPS and Low averaging 91.6 FPS. The High preset at 4K averages 59.4 FPS, which is just below the playability threshold, and Ultra at 44.5 FPS is not recommended.

The verdict by resolution is clear: for 1080p and 1440p, the combo delivers a fully playable experience at the highest settings. For 4K, users should stick to Medium or Low to maintain smooth frame rates. The data shows that this is a capable system for Fivem, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra is off the table.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: The combo averages 125.9 FPS at 1080p Ultra, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with High settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 High, the average FPS is 59.4, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium is the highest playable preset at 4K, averaging 72.7 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to the RTX 5070 in this game?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187, which is 2% higher than the RTX 5070's 40377. This means the RTX 3080 Ti would deliver slightly higher frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1005 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 27% of all systems.

Q: Is the i7-14700F or the RTX 3080 Ti the limiting factor at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the GPU is the primary constraint, as shown by the steep frame rate drop from Low (171.6 FPS) to Ultra (81.5 FPS). The CPU has sufficient headroom at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 2560x1440 that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 81.5 FPS, making it the most demanding playable option. Low (171.6 FPS), Medium (135.4 FPS), and High (107.5 FPS) all also clear the threshold.