Fivem

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. The recorded data shows that at 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches an average of 55.9 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 35.4 FPS, Medium averages 44.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. None of the 4K presets clear the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable settings preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 65.5 FPS. The Low preset averages 103 FPS, and Medium averages 84.8 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 52 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Does the Ultra preset work at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 79.2 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 98.4 FPS, Medium averages 126.7 FPS, and Low averages 156.6 FPS. All four presets at 1080p are playable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to nearby processors in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which puts it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53701, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% behind the i7-14700F.

Q: How does the GPU compare to similar graphics cards in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093, placing it in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs. The closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, which is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, which is 1.5% ahead.

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination for Fivem?

A: The combination ranks 2700 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, meaning many other hardware configurations deliver higher frame rates in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this configuration covers three resolutions and four settings presets each. The database records average FPS values for every combination, with minimum and maximum FPS not captured for any of the tested scenarios.

At 1920x1080, the performance envelope is broad. The Low preset delivers an average of 156.6 FPS, making it the fastest configuration in the entire dataset. Moving up to Medium drops the average to 126.7 FPS, a 19% reduction from Low. The High preset averages 98.4 FPS, which is 22% lower than Medium. The Ultra preset is the most demanding at this resolution, averaging 79.2 FPS, still comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a drop of 77.4 FPS, or roughly 49% of the Low preset's performance.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with lower absolute values. The Low preset averages 103 FPS, which is 34% slower than the same preset at 1080p. Medium averages 84.8 FPS, a 33% drop from its 1080p counterpart. High averages 65.5 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold, and represents a 33% reduction from the 1080p High score. Ultra drops to 52 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 51 FPS, meaning Ultra delivers only about half the frame rate of Low.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The Low preset averages 55.9 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 44.1 FPS, a 21% drop from Low. High averages 35.4 FPS, a 20% drop from Medium. Ultra averages 28 FPS, a 21% drop from High. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a loss of 27.9 FPS, representing a 50% reduction. Notably, the lowest 4K preset does not achieve playable performance, and the highest 4K preset averages less than half of the playable threshold.

Looking at the resolution scaling more broadly, the data shows that moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset costs approximately one-third of the frame rate. Moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 40% to 46% depending on the preset. The High preset at 4K (35.4 FPS) is less than half of the High preset at 1080p (98.4 FPS). The Ultra preset at 4K (28 FPS) is about one-third of the Ultra preset at 1080p (79.2 FPS).

The database also provides context through the CPU and GPU standalone benchmarks. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4958 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core. Passmark multithread score is 41317, and Passmark single-thread is 4257. The GPU scores 16462 in Passmark G3D and 6721 in Passmark GPU compute. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 76957 for OpenCL and 77402 for Vulkan. These synthetic benchmarks align with the measured FPS data, showing a strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU that struggles at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database provides a clear verdict for each resolution based on the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 79.2. This is the most demanding preset available, and it stays above the 60 FPS threshold with a 19.2 FPS margin. All four presets at 1080p are playable, so users can select Ultra for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, with an average FPS of 65.5. This preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 5.5 FPS margin. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 52 FPS, which is below the threshold, so High represents the maximum visual quality that maintains playability. Medium and Low are also playable, with 84.8 and 103 FPS respectively.

At 3840x2160, the database records no playable settings. The best result is the Low preset at 55.9 FPS, which is 4.1 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 44.1 FPS, High averages 35.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. There is no settings preset at 4K that reaches the playable threshold, so users targeting 4K would need to consider lower resolutions or different hardware.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1920x1080 has four playable settings (High, Low, Medium, Ultra) with Ultra as the best; 2560x1440 has three playable settings (High, Low, Medium) with High as the best; 3840x2160 has zero playable settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU, which helps identify hardware that would behave similarly in Fivem.

For the Intel Core i7-14700F, the nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 6505P, Intel Xeon Phi 7290, AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and AMD EPYC 7313P. The Xeon 6505P scores 53701, which is 0.2% ahead of the i7-14700F's 53620. The Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, 0.6% behind. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, 0.8% behind. All four rivals are within 1% of the i7-14700F's average benchmark score, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and its rivals occupy a similar performance band.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, AMD Radeon Pro 5700, AMD Radeon RX 460, and Intel Arc A770M. The RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, which is 0.4% ahead of the RTX 2060 SUPER's 18093. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, 1.5% ahead. The Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, 1.6% ahead. All four rivals are within 2% of the RTX 2060 SUPER's average benchmark score, meaning they would produce very similar frame rates in Fivem. The RTX 2060 SUPER sits in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, and these rivals represent the closest matching performance levels.

When considering a system with similar overall performance, pairing any of the listed CPUs with any of the listed GPUs would yield Fivem results close to the measured data. The CPU has a 91st percentile standing, while the GPU has a 62nd percentile standing, so the GPU is the more limiting component for frame rates in this game. The measured FPS data confirms this: even at 1080p Low, the frame rate is 156.6 FPS, which is well below the CPU's potential, indicating GPU-bound behavior at all tested settings.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with playable frame rates, but not at 3840x2160.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on every settings preset. The Ultra preset averages 79.2 FPS, which is the most demanding configuration and still provides a 19.2 FPS margin above the playable threshold. Users at 1080p can max out the game's settings and expect smooth performance, with the Low preset reaching 156.6 FPS for high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, the system is partially playable. The High preset averages 65.5 FPS, clearing the threshold by 5.5 FPS. Medium averages 84.8 FPS, and Low averages 103 FPS, both comfortably above 60 FPS. However, the Ultra preset averages 52 FPS, which falls below the threshold. Users at 1440p should choose High settings to maintain playability, accepting a visual quality reduction compared to Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot reach the 60 FPS threshold on any preset. The Low preset comes closest at 55.9 FPS, but this is still 4.1 FPS short. The Ultra preset averages 28 FPS, which is less than half of the playable threshold. Users targeting 4K would need to lower the resolution or upgrade the GPU.

The verdict by resolution is clear: 1920x1080 has four playable settings with Ultra as the best option; 2560x1440 has three playable settings with High as the best option; 3840x2160 has zero playable settings. The GPU's 62nd percentile standing relative to all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 91st percentile standing, indicates that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck for higher resolution play.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos for Fivem, this CPU and GPU pairing ranks 2700 out of 3707 combinations. This places the configuration in the 72.8th percentile of the ranking, meaning about 26% of tested combos rank lower and about 73% rank higher.

The ranking position is consistent with the component benchmark data. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, which is strong, but the GPU ranks in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, which is mid-range. Since Fivem appears to be GPU-bound at most settings based on the measured FPS scaling, the GPU's lower standing pulls the overall combo rank down.

The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 156.6 FPS, which is high but not exceptional for a strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. At 4K Ultra, the system drops to 28 FPS, indicating that the GPU cannot sustain playable performance at the highest resolution and settings. The rank of 2700 out of 3707 reflects this combination of strong CPU performance and moderate GPU performance.

The nearest rival GPUs, which all score within 1.6% of the RTX 2060 SUPER, would produce nearly identical combo ranks if paired with the same CPU. Similarly, the nearest rival CPUs, all within 0.8% of the i7-14700F, would not meaningfully change the combo rank. The ranking is primarily determined by the GPU's mid-range position in the database, and the CPU's high percentile does not compensate enough to push the combo into the upper quartile of Fivem-specific rankings.

For users considering this configuration, the data shows that it is well-suited for 1080p gaming across all presets and capable at 1440p with High settings, but it falls short at 4K. The combo rank of 2700 out of 3707 places it in the lower half of tested configurations, but the playable performance at 1080p and 1440p makes it a functional choice for those resolutions.