Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 31 | 39 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 56 | 71 | 89 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 86 | 107 | 136 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a clear case of a powerful CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, resulting in a system that is heavily constrained by graphics processing at higher resolutions. Benchmark data shows that this pairing is a solid 1080p performer, capable of running Fivem at maximum settings with comfortable headroom, but it struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU’s substantial multi-core capabilities remain largely underutilized in this particular title.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the goal is to identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings are as follows:
At 3840x2160 (4K), no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average frame rate recorded is 50 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 39 FPS average, High is 31 FPS, and Ultra is 24 FPS. Therefore, there is no "best" playable setting; the data indicates this resolution is not viable for a 60 FPS experience with this hardware.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 71 FPS. This setting provides a significant performance buffer above the 60 FPS target. While Low settings achieve a higher average of 89 FPS, Medium is the optimal choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. High settings fall to 56 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS, both missing the 60 FPS mark.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which yields an average of 67 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that remains playable. The data shows a clear progression: Low averages 136 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS, and High averages 86 FPS, all comfortably above the threshold. Ultra, at 67 FPS average, is the only setting that pushes the limit but still clears the requirement.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate a significant shift in component responsibility as resolution changes. The performance scaling between presets and resolutions reveals that the Intel Arc B570 is the limiting factor in most scenarios.
Comparing the frame rates across resolutions for the same settings illustrates the GPU load. For instance, at Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 107 at 1080p to 71 at 1440p, a reduction of roughly a third. Moving to 4K, the average plummets to 39 FPS, less than half the 1080p figure. This steep decline with increasing pixel count is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The GPU's rendering workload scales directly with the number of pixels, and the Arc B570's 10 GB of memory and 160-bit bus width appear to be insufficient for the demands of 4K in this game.
The role of the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700F, is more prominent at lower resolutions. At 1080p, where the GPU has less work per frame, the CPU must supply frames faster. The high frame rates seen at 1080p Low (136 FPS) and Medium (107 FPS) suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. However, the CPU's potential is not fully stressed, as evidenced by the fact that even at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS (67) is still likely limited by the GPU's ability to render the complex scenes, not the CPU's processing speed.
The data implies that at 1080p, the system is more balanced, but the GPU still holds the system back from achieving even higher frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant factor, with the CPU having ample headroom. The i7-14700F’s 20 cores and 28 threads are a significant resource, but Fivem's workload, which is often single-threaded or lightly threaded, does not appear to leverage this fully, making the GPU the decisive component for playability.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the average benchmark scores, the Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B570 are closely matched by a few other components. This indicates that swapping to these alternatives would result in similar overall system performance.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a near-identical performer, with a delta of 0.6% from the i7-14700F's average benchmark score. This suggests that in a system with the same GPU, using a Ryzen 9 7900X would yield very similar FPS figures. The AMD EPYC 7313P is also very close, with a 0.8% delta, though its server-oriented design might have different power characteristics. The Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 are within a fraction of a percent, but these are less common in consumer gaming builds.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A750 is the most direct comparable, with a delta of -0.1% from the Arc B570's average score. This implies that the previous-generation Arc A750 would perform almost identically to the B570 in Fivem. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is also a very close match (0.1% delta), which is interesting as it suggests desktop-level performance from a mobile part. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M are also listed as near rivals, with deltas of -0.5% and 0.4% respectively, but these are older architectures and may lack modern feature support.
These comparisons show that users with any of these alternative components would likely experience very similar frame rates and settings limitations in Fivem.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Fivem is nuanced and depends entirely on the target resolution. The data provides a clear answer for each resolution.
At 3840x2160, the answer is no. The verdict confirms that there are no playable settings, as all presets fail to reach an average of 60 FPS. The highest achievable average is 50 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. This system is not suitable for 4K gaming in Fivem.
At 2560x1440, the answer is yes, with adjustments. The system can run the game smoothly on Low and Medium settings, with Medium being the recommended "best" setting at an average of 71 FPS. High and Ultra settings are not playable, averaging 56 FPS and 44 FPS respectively. This resolution offers a good balance for this hardware, provided the user is willing to use medium-quality presets.
At 1920x1080, the answer is a definitive yes. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four presets tested. The best playable setting is Ultra, which averages 67 FPS. This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for this combination, allowing for maximum visual quality with a smooth, playable frame rate.
In summary, this PC is a capable 1080p gaming machine for Fivem, a decent 1440p machine with settings compromises, and an inadequate 4K machine for this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination tested.
At 3840x2160:
- Low: 50 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Medium: 39 FPS average, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS.
- High: 31 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Ultra: 24 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
At 2560x1440:
- Low: 89 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Medium: 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS.
- High: 56 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Ultra: 44 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
At 1920x1080:
- Low: 136 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Medium: 107 FPS average, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS.
- High: 86 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
- Ultra: 67 FPS average (min/max not recorded).
The data shows a consistent pattern: frame rates scale down as resolution and quality increase. The minimum FPS figures for Medium settings at 1080p and 1440p are notably close to the average, indicating relatively stable frame pacing at that quality level. The lack of min/max data for other settings makes it harder to assess frame time consistency, but the averages alone demonstrate the performance envelope.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested configurations, this specific combination of CPU and GPU ranks in the lower half of all test results. The combo rank for this system is 2980 out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the 20th percentile of all systems tested for Fivem, meaning that 80% of tested configurations performed better overall.
This ranking seems to contradict the strong 1080p performance seen in the measured FPS data. The likely explanation is that the ranking considers performance across all resolutions, including 4K, where this system fails to reach playable frame rates. Many other combos in the database likely feature more powerful GPUs that can handle 4K, thus boosting their overall rank. While the i7-14700F is a high-end CPU (ranked in the 91st percentile of all CPUs), the Arc B570 is a mid-range GPU (ranked in the 65th percentile of all GPUs). The combination's overall rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, dragging the system down despite the CPU's strength.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution with any settings?
A: No. The data shows that no preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 60 FPS. The highest average is 50 FPS on Low settings, which is below the playable threshold of 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p for this system?
A: The best playable setting at 2560x1440 is Medium, which delivers an average of 71 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS.
Q: How does this system perform at 1080p compared to 1440p?
A: At 1080p, the system can run on Ultra settings with an average of 67 FPS. At 1440p, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 71 FPS. The higher resolution requires a significant reduction in settings to maintain smooth performance.
Q: Which component is the main bottleneck for this system in Fivem?
A: The benchmark data indicates the Intel Arc B570 GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The frame rates drop sharply as resolution increases, showing the GPU is struggling to keep up, while the CPU (Intel Core i7-14700F) has more capability than is being utilized.
Q: Are there any other GPUs that would perform similarly to the Arc B570 in this game?
A: Yes. According to the data, the Intel Arc A750 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile have average benchmark scores within 0.1% of the Arc B570, indicating they would produce very similar frame rates in Fivem.
Q: How does this PC rank against all other tested hardware combinations for Fivem?
A: This combination ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of tested systems, which is likely due to its inability to handle 4K resolution, despite being very capable at 1080p.