Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 580 form a combination that can run Fivem, but only within a narrow envelope. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile. Recorded measurements show that this pairing clears the 60 FPS threshold only at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings, and the data points to the graphics card as the limiting factor at every resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701 (0.2% ahead of the i7), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (0.6% behind), and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (0.8% behind). All four sit within a fraction of a percent of the i7-14700F, so swapping in any of them would yield nearly identical CPU behavior in Fivem. The single-thread and multithread scores reinforce this: the i7-14700F records a Passmark single-thread score of 4257 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122, while the nearest rivals cluster around the same average.

The AMD Radeon RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 12928. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile at 12940 (0.1% ahead of the RX 580), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER at 12986 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon 740M at 12870 (0.5% behind), and the AMD FirePro W5100 at 12847 (0.6% behind). Any of these GPUs would land within a fraction of a percent of the RX 580's rendering throughput, meaning the same playable settings would apply. The RX 580's Passmark G3D score of 8813 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1005 place it in the lower half of the GPU distribution, and its nearest rivals occupy the same territory.

Because both components have close rivals, a system built around any of these nearby parts would behave similarly in Fivem. The combination's overall position in the database, 3400 out of 3707 tested combos, reflects the GPU's ceiling rather than the CPU's capability. A user upgrading from the RX 580 to the GTX 1660 SUPER, for example, would see essentially no change in Fivem performance, and the same holds for moving from the i7-14700F to the Ryzen 9 7900X.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The highest recorded average is Low at 33.9 FPS, followed by Medium at 23.0, High at 20.5, and Ultra at 14.2. There is no best playable setting because none qualifies. Even the least demanding preset leaves the frame rate at roughly half of the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, no preset clears 60 FPS either. Low averages 55.2 FPS, Medium 43.7, High 34.0, and Ultra 30.1. The closest approach to the threshold is Low at 55.2, but it still falls short by a noticeable margin. The gap between Low and the next step, Medium at 43.7, shows that the GPU cannot sustain playable frame rates at this resolution regardless of detail level.

At 1920x1080, two presets clear 60 FPS: Low at 83.2 and Medium at 65.7. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 65.7 FPS. High drops to 53.0 and Ultra to 41.1, both below the playable threshold. The best settings for this resolution are Medium, which delivers a playable experience while retaining more detail than Low. Low remains an option for users who prefer higher frame rates, but Medium is the highest preset that meets the 60 FPS requirement.

CPU and GPU Roles

The i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs. The RX 580 is a GCN 4.0 GPU with 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, ranking at the 53rd percentile among GPUs. In Fivem, the recorded FPS scales steeply with resolution, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation.

At 1080p Low, the average is 83.2 FPS; at 4K Low, it is 33.9 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, resolution scaling would be far flatter. The same pattern appears across presets: 1080p Medium averages 65.7 FPS, 1440p Medium averages 43.7, and 4K Medium averages 23.0. Each resolution step cuts the frame rate by a large margin, confirming the GPU is the binding constraint. The RX 580's memory configuration of 8 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p, but at 1440p and 4K the bandwidth and pixel throughput become insufficient.

Preset scaling reinforces this. At 1080p, Low averages 83.2 FPS while Ultra averages 41.1. The CPU has ample headroom: its Passmark multithread score of 41317 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 place it far above what Fivem requires. The RX 580's 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is not enough to feed higher resolutions and presets. The CPU's launch MSRP is $359, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 229 USD.

In practical terms, the CPU's role in this pairing is to avoid being a bottleneck, and it succeeds. The GPU's role is to determine the playable envelope, and it defines a hard ceiling at 1080p Medium. The i7-14700F's single-core performance, reflected in its Geekbench single-core score of 2429, is more than sufficient for Fivem's simulation load; the recorded FPS is consistently tied to the GPU's rendering limits.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem, but only at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings. The verdict data shows that 1920x1080 has two playable presets: Low and Medium. The best playable setting is Medium, averaging 65.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the closest is Low at 55.2. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS either; the highest is Low at 33.9.

The i7-14700F has the compute headroom to handle Fivem's multiplayer workloads, but the RX 580's graphics throughput caps the experience. For a 1080p display with Medium settings, this combination is playable. For 1440p or 4K displays, it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold across all presets. Users targeting higher resolutions would need a more capable GPU to move the playable envelope upward.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists every recorded measurement for this combination in Fivem. Min and max FPS values were not recorded in the database; only averages are available.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 20.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 33.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23.0 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 14.2 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 34.0 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 55.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 43.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 30.1 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 53.0 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 83.2 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 65.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 41.1 |

The pattern is consistent: every resolution step down increases FPS substantially, and every preset step down does the same. At 1080p, the range from Low to Ultra spans 83.2 down to 41.1. At 1440p, it spans 55.2 down to 30.1. At 4K, it spans 33.9 down to 14.2. This compression at higher resolutions again points to the GPU as the limiting factor, since pixel fill and memory bandwidth become scarcer relative to the workload. The 1080p Medium result of 65.7 FPS is the most demanding playable preset, while Low at 83.2 offers higher frame rates at reduced detail.

How This Combo Ranks

This CPU and GPU pairing ranks 3400 out of 3707 tested combinations in the Fivem database. That places it in the lower portion of the field. The high-end CPU does not rescue the overall position because the GPU drags the pair down. The RX 580's 53rd percentile standing among GPUs, combined with the i7-14700F's 91st percentile among CPUs, creates a large performance gap between the two components. In Fivem, the weaker component defines the experience, and the recorded FPS reflects that.

The rank is not an outlier caused by a defective sample; the CPU's nearest rivals all sit within a fraction of a percent of 53620, and the GPU's nearest rivals all sit within a fraction of a percent of 12928. This is the expected result for this class of hardware. The combination sits below the majority of the 3707 tested configurations, which is consistent with a mid-range GPU from 2017 paired with a high-end CPU from 2024. The CPU's single-thread performance, reflected in its Passmark single-thread score of 4257 and Geekbench single-core score of 2429, is strong enough to keep the simulation side of Fivem running smoothly, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 8813 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1005 place a firm limit on the overall result.