Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 68 | 85 | 107 | 135 |
| 1440p QHD | 117 | 154 | 189 | 242 |
| 1080p Full HD | 183 | 230 | 289 | 367 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is an exceptionally high-end combination, and the measured data for Fivem reflects that status. This pairing ranks in the 97th percentile of all tested combos for this specific game, placing it at rank 110 out of 3,707 configurations. The data indicates that this system is positioned to handle Fivem with significant headroom at nearly every setting and resolution tested, making it a top-tier option for players seeking maximum frame rates in this multiplayer title.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame data places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 110 out of 3,707 tested combinations. This translates to the top 3% of all systems evaluated for Fivem, a position that underscores the sheer performance headroom this hardware brings to the table. The rank is a holistic measure, considering both the Intel Core i7-13700K's strong multi-threaded capabilities and the RTX 4090's dominant rasterization performance.
The CPU itself sits at the 89th percentile among all processors benchmarked, with an average benchmark score of 46,881. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, score 46,971, a mere 0.2% difference, indicating that the i7-13700K is at the very top of the performance pyramid for its class. Similarly, the GPU holds the 88th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average score of 60,347. Interestingly, its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, has a nearly identical score of 60,326, a 0.0% delta, though the RTX 4090’s real-world gaming performance is far more substantial than that specific benchmark average might suggest. The combination of two components performing at the 88th-89th percentile of their respective categories results in a top-3% overall ranking for Fivem, confirming that this is a flagship-level setup.
CPU and GPU Roles
Analyzing the measured FPS across resolutions and presets reveals the dynamic between the CPU and GPU in Fivem. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 366.8 FPS. This incredibly high frame rate is a clear indicator of a CPU-bound scenario; the RTX 4090 is capable of rendering far more frames than the CPU can feed it, placing the bottleneck squarely on the processor's single-thread performance. As resolution increases to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the frame rate drops to 241.7 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls further to 135.1 FPS. This scaling pattern demonstrates that as resolution increases, the load shifts from the CPU to the GPU, which has to work harder to fill the larger number of pixels.
The shift becomes even more apparent when comparing presets. At 4K, moving from Low to Ultra settings reduces the average FPS from 135.1 to 68.1, a 49.6% decrease. This substantial drop is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's workload. Conversely, at 1080p, the same preset change only reduces the frame rate from 366.8 to 183 FPS, a 50.1% decrease, but the absolute numbers remain so high that the CPU's role in limiting peak frame rates is more pronounced. The data shows that while both components are critical, the RTX 4090 becomes the dominant factor at 4K and at high preset levels, whereas the i7-13700K's capabilities are the primary limiter at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU has more headroom. The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is more than capable of driving high frame rates, but the GPU defines the ceiling at higher graphical loads.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all presets and resolutions. The dataset includes average FPS figures, with min and max values not specified in the provided information.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: The average FPS is 135.1, providing a very smooth experience.
- Medium: The average FPS is 106.5, still well above the 60 FPS threshold.
- High: The average FPS is 84.8, maintaining high fluidity.
- Ultra: The average FPS is 68.1, which is the most demanding setting at this resolution but still clears the playable threshold.
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: The average FPS is 241.7, offering an extremely responsive experience.
- Medium: The average FPS is 189.3, a significant step down but still very high.
- High: The average FPS is 154.4, providing excellent smoothness.
- Ultra: The average FPS is 117.3, ensuring a high-refresh-rate experience is possible.
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: The average FPS is 366.8, a number that far exceeds any standard display's refresh rate.
- Medium: The average FPS is 288.6, showcasing the massive headroom in this configuration.
- High: The average FPS is 229.5, still an exceptionally high number.
- Ultra: The average FPS is 183, which is more than enough for even the fastest gaming monitors.
The progression of scores shows a consistent and predictable scaling. For instance, at 1080p, dropping from Ultra to Low results in a 100.4% performance increase, from 183 to 366.8 FPS. At 4K, the same change yields a 98.4% increase from 68.1 to 135.1 FPS. This indicates that the performance scaling is consistent across resolutions, though the absolute frame rates at 4K are lower due to the increased GPU load.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users considering this exact combination, the nearestRivals data for the CPU and GPU offers insight into components that would behave similarly. The data shows that the Intel Core i7-13700K's average benchmark score of 46,881 is virtually identical to that of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46,971 (-0.2%). This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as Fivem at lower resolutions, these two processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates. Other close alternatives include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022, -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46,654, +0.5%).
On the GPU side, the RTX 4090's average benchmark score of 60,347 is closely matched by the Intel Arc Pro A60, which scores 60,326 (0.0% delta). However, it is crucial to note that this specific benchmark average may not fully represent gaming performance. Other listed rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140, +0.3%) and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, +2.9%). While these GPUs show similar average scores in synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 4090's massive 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance would likely lead to divergent results in actual gaming workloads, especially at higher resolutions. This list should be interpreted cautiously, as synthetic benchmarks can sometimes obscure real-world gaming differences.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the verdictByResolution data, the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
- 3840x2160 (4K): The best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 68.1. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset dips below 100 FPS, but it still comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS floor, proving that this system can run Fivem at maximum visual quality in 4K.
- 2560x1440 (1440p): The best settings are also Ultra, but with a much higher average FPS of 117.3. This means users can enjoy the highest preset at 1440p with a frame rate that is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors.
- 1920x1080 (1080p): The best settings are Ultra, delivering an average FPS of 183. This is the optimal configuration for competitive play, as the frame rate is high enough to take full advantage of 144Hz or 165Hz displays, with a significant margin to spare.
In all cases, the system is not just playable but is capable of running the game at its highest preset while maintaining frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?
A: Yes. The benchmark data shows that at 3840x2160, the system achieves an average of 68.1 FPS on the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets (High, Medium, Low) also exceed 60 FPS.
Q: What is the highest FPS this combination can achieve?
A: The highest recorded average FPS is 366.8, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset. This indicates a CPU-bound scenario where the frame rate is exceptionally high.
Q: How does the i7-13700K compare to its closest competitor?
A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46,881, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900's score of 46,971. This indicates nearly identical synthetic performance.
Q: Is the RTX 4090 the most powerful GPU in the benchmark database for this game?
A: No. While it holds a percentile rank of 88 among all GPUs, its average benchmark score of 60,347 is closely matched by the Intel Arc Pro A60, which has a score of 60,326 and a 0.0% delta. The RTX 4090 is a top-tier card but not the sole leader in this specific metric.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Low is 241.7, while on Ultra it is 117.3. This represents a 51.5% decrease in performance when moving to the highest preset.
Q: Will this system be able to maintain high frame rates on a 240Hz monitor at 1080p?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the average FPS on the Ultra preset is 183, and on High it is 229.5. This means the system can consistently push frame rates high enough to utilize a 240Hz display, especially on lower presets.
The Verdict
The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Fivem exceptionally well. The verdictByResolution data confirms that the Intel Core i7-13700K and RTX 4090 combination clears the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution and preset tested. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 183 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 117.3 FPS, offering a perfect balance of visual fidelity and speed. Even at the most demanding 3840x2160 resolution, the system achieves an average of 68.1 FPS on the Ultra preset, which is not only playable but smooth. This system is not just able to run Fivem; it is capable of dominating it, providing a top-tier experience across all settings and resolutions, with its only limitation being the refresh rate of the display it is connected to.