Fivem

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-13700K sits in a tight cluster of high-end processors according to the database. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores only 0.2% lower in average benchmark performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 trails by 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535 both edge ahead by 0.5%. These four alternatives would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem, meaning frame pacing and simulation overhead would feel essentially the same. The i7-13700K lands in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, so any of these rivals would place a system in the same upper tier of processing capability.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is bracketed by a more diverse set of alternatives. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 1% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 1.2% slower, and the Intel Arc B570 sits 1.3% behind. The Intel Arc A750 is the closest competitor at 1.5% slower. None of these represent a meaningful upgrade or downgrade; the RTX 2070 SUPER occupies the 65th percentile among all GPUs, and its neighbors would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem. The data suggests that swapping to any of these four cards would keep average FPS within a couple of percentage points across all tested resolutions and settings.

What stands out is the asymmetry between the two components. The CPU is surrounded by other 12-core and 16-core parts with similar multi-threaded muscle, while the GPU sits among a mix of workstation, mobile, and desktop cards that all happen to converge on the same performance tier. In practical terms, a user moving between any of these GPU alternatives would need to watch the same settings guide, and a user moving between any of these CPU alternatives would see no measurable change in Fivem's frame output.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded average frame rate is 84.9 FPS at 1080p Ultra, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: Low is the only preset that stays above 60 FPS at 4K, averaging 65.9 FPS. Medium drops to 50.3 FPS and High falls to 38.8 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER scores 1.5% higher in average GPU benchmarks than the Arc A750, so the two cards should produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra at 2560x1440?

A: Low averages 112.7 FPS while Ultra averages 58.8 FPS, a difference of 53.9 FPS. Ultra falls just below the 60 FPS threshold, so it is not classified as fully playable.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the 4K performance drop?

A: The frame rate scaling from 1440p to 4K points to the GPU as the limiting factor. At 1440p High the system averages 72.6 FPS, but at 4K High it drops to 38.8 FPS, a 46.6% reduction that aligns with the GPU's rendering load increasing faster than the CPU's workload.

Q: How many tested combinations does this setup rank above in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 2166th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the upper 41% of all configurations in the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS data for the i7-13700K and RTX 2070 SUPER combination covers three resolutions and four settings tiers, with only average FPS values reported, no minimum or maximum frame times.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 177.9 FPS on Low, 139.3 FPS on Medium, 110.7 FPS on High, and 84.9 FPS on Ultra. Every preset at 1080p exceeds 60 FPS, and even the most demanding setting leaves substantial headroom. The step from Low to Medium costs 38.6 FPS, Medium to High costs 28.6 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 25.8 FPS. The scaling is consistent, suggesting a balanced load across the settings tiers rather than a sudden bottleneck.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 112.7 FPS on Low, 89.1 FPS on Medium, 72.6 FPS on High, and 58.8 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is 23.6 FPS, Medium to High is 16.5 FPS, and High to Ultra is 13.8 FPS. The diminishing returns pattern holds, but Ultra slips below the playable threshold at this resolution. The gap between 1080p and 1440p at the same setting is substantial: Low falls by 65.2 FPS, Medium by 50.2 FPS, High by 38.1 FPS, and Ultra by 26.1 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low averages 65.9 FPS, Medium drops to 50.3 FPS, High falls to 38.8 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 30.3 FPS. The 4K Low result is the only playable option, and it barely clears the threshold. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Low costs 46.8 FPS, at Medium 38.8 FPS, at High 33.8 FPS, and at Ultra 28.5 FPS. The absolute frame counts shrink as resolution rises, but the relative cost of each preset step grows, which indicates the GPU is running out of raw throughput at higher pixel counts.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the definition of playable depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, all four settings tiers clear 60 FPS, with Ultra delivering 84.9 FPS, so a user can max out the game without compromise. At 2560x1440, High, Medium, and Low all stay above 60 FPS, with High averaging 72.6 FPS as the best visual quality option that remains smooth. Ultra at 1440p falls to 58.8 FPS, just under the threshold, so it is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, averaging 65.9 FPS. Medium at 50.3 FPS, High at 38.8 FPS, and Ultra at 30.3 FPS all miss the mark. The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p users can run anything, 1440p users can run everything except Ultra, and 4K users must drop to Low settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The data does not include minimum FPS values, so stutter behavior cannot be assessed, but the average frame rates provide a reliable baseline for expected performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the i7-13700K and the RTX 2070 SUPER becomes visible when comparing frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance, reflected in a 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116, keeps the system fed even at 177.9 FPS on Low. The GPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution; the frame rate is high enough that the CPU's role in game logic and draw calls becomes more prominent.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU begins to assert itself. The 58.8 FPS Ultra result versus the 72.6 FPS High result shows that the rendering pipeline, not the processor, is now setting the ceiling. The RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1440p, but the pixel throughput demands grow faster than the CPU workload does. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 12412, are not being fully exercised in Fivem at this resolution.

At 4K, the GPU is unambiguously the bottleneck. The 30.3 FPS Ultra result versus the 65.9 FPS Low result shows a 35.6 FPS swing driven almost entirely by pixel count and shading complexity. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors means it has ample headroom to feed the GPU, but the RTX 2070 SUPER's 65th percentile GPU ranking means it simply cannot push enough pixels at 4K with high settings. The frame rate scaling between 1440p and 4K at identical settings, for example 72.6 to 38.8 FPS on High, confirms that the GPU's rendering capacity is the dominant factor at higher resolutions. Users with a 4K display should treat the CPU as an enabler and the GPU as the constraint.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 84.9 FPS. There is no reason to lower the settings at this resolution, as even the heaviest option leaves over 24 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is High, averaging 72.6 FPS. Ultra is not viable at 58.8 FPS, so High represents the optimal balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. Medium and Low are also playable at 89.1 FPS and 112.7 FPS respectively, but they sacrifice image quality without a necessity.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is Low, averaging 65.9 FPS. This is the only playable preset at 4K, and it barely clears the threshold. Medium at 50.3 FPS, High at 38.8 FPS, and Ultra at 30.3 FPS are all below 60 FPS and should be avoided if frame rate consistency is the priority. The progression from 1080p Ultra to 1440p High to 4K Low shows a clear pattern: each resolution step requires roughly one full settings tier of sacrifice to maintain playable performance.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3707 combinations tested in the database, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2166th. That places it in the upper 41% of all configurations, which is a respectable position given that the CPU is a top-tier part while the GPU is a mid-range card from an older generation. The rank reflects the combined effect of the 89th percentile CPU and the 65th percentile GPU, with the GPU pulling the overall position down from what the processor alone would achieve.

The rank also contextualizes the FPS measurements. A 2166th place finish out of 3707 means there are 1541 combinations that perform better in Fivem, many of which likely pair the same or similar CPUs with stronger GPUs. Conversely, the 2166th rank means this setup outperforms a majority of tested systems, particularly those with weaker processors or older graphics cards. For a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework with moderate graphical demands, this rank suggests the combo is well suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming and acceptable 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring settings compromises. The data does not include a percentile score for the combo specifically, but the rank of 2166 out of 3707 is the definitive measure of where this hardware sits in the tested population.