Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
331 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
162 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
218 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
59 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 76 95 121
1440p QHD 107 138 172 218
1080p Full HD 162 209 261 331

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 209
1920x1080 Low 331
1920x1080 Medium 261
1920x1080 Ultra 162
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 218
2560x1440 Medium 172
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 59

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers a commanding performance profile in Fivem, with benchmark data showing this combination ranks 259th out of 3,707 tested combos for this specific multiplayer title. The measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that is consistently above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the only exception being the absolute maximum settings at 4K, which lands just one frame short. This analysis breaks down the raw data to show exactly where this hardware excels, where its limits appear, and what the numbers imply for different display configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4080 SUPER and i7-12700KF produce exceptional frame rates that leave substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Low preset achieves an average of 331 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 261 FPS, with a minimum of 222 FPS and a maximum of 301 FPS, indicating that even the lower bounds of performance remain far above what most displays can show. The High preset delivers 209 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset still manages a robust 162 FPS, demonstrating that this combination never struggles at 1080p regardless of visual fidelity.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance scaling follows a predictable pattern but remains exceptionally strong. The Low preset hits 218 FPS on average, which is still a very high number for a 1440p resolution. Medium settings produce 172 FPS average, with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery without significant dips. High settings reach 138 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a comfortable 107 FPS average. These numbers suggest that 1440p gaming with this hardware is not just playable but genuinely smooth across all quality tiers.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K resolution become apparent, though the system still performs admirably. The Low preset achieves 121 FPS on average, which is a strong result for 4K. Medium settings produce 95 FPS average, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, indicating that frame pacing remains stable even when the GPU is working harder. The High preset delivers 76 FPS on average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. However, the Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS on average, just below the playability threshold, marking the only configuration in the entire dataset where this combination fails to reach 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling between resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high, with the Low preset reaching 331 FPS and even the Ultra preset hitting 162 FPS. These numbers suggest that at lower resolutions, the CPU has more influence on the final frame rate, as the GPU is not fully saturated and the i7-12700KF's 12 cores and 20 threads can keep feeding frames at a rapid pace. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 169 FPS, which is a significant 51% reduction, showing that the GPU does still matter but the CPU is clearly capable of driving very high frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling pattern shows the GPU beginning to exert more control. The Low preset drops from 331 FPS at 1080p to 218 FPS at 1440p, a 34% reduction that reflects the increased pixel workload. The Ultra preset drops from 162 FPS to 107 FPS, a 34% reduction as well, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 111 FPS, which is a smaller absolute gap than at 1080p, further confirming the GPU's growing role.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, as expected. The Low preset falls to 121 FPS, which is a 44% reduction from the 1080p Low figure, while the Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS, a 64% reduction from the 1080p Ultra figure. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K narrows to just 62 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU is heavily loaded across all settings and the CPU has less influence on the final outcome. The i7-12700KF's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,838 and a Passmark multithread score of 34,092, indicate it has ample processing power, but the data shows that at 4K, the RTX 4080 SUPER's workload dominates the performance equation.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for the CPU provides context for how the i7-12700KF compares to other processors that would deliver similar performance in this combination. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an average score of 35,403, which is a 0.1% delta from the i7-12700KF's average score of 35,365, meaning the two perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, a 0.2% delta, while the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428, a -0.2% delta. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35,287, a 0.2% delta, showing that the locked and unlocked versions of the same chip are effectively equivalent in this context. Any of these CPUs would produce virtually the same frame rates in Fivem when paired with the RTX 4080 SUPER.

For the GPU, the nearestRivals list includes the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which has an average score of 54,247, a -0.1% delta from the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54,209. This indicates the original RTX 4080 would perform essentially the same as the SUPER variant in this game. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, a -1.1% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, a -2.7% delta, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, a -2.8% delta. The negative delta values for these AMD cards indicate they actually score slightly higher in the average benchmark, but the differences are small enough that real-world Fivem performance would be very close to the RTX 4080 SUPER.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Fivem has a clear answer based on the measured data: yes, it can run the game at 60 FPS or higher in almost every configuration tested. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding Ultra setting averaging 162 FPS. This resolution is fully playable with maximum settings, and the frame rates are high enough for 144Hz or even 165Hz displays.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. The Low preset averages 218 FPS, Medium averages 172 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, and Ultra averages 107 FPS. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold with substantial margin, meaning 1440p users can enable the highest quality settings without worrying about performance. The data indicates that this resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a balance between visual fidelity and frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the situation requires more nuance. The Low, Medium, and High presets all deliver average frame rates above 60 FPS, with High being the best playable setting at 76 FPS. However, the Ultra preset falls to 59 FPS on average, which is just one frame below the 60 FPS threshold. This means 4K users must choose between Ultra settings and a stable 60 FPS, since the data shows this preset does not meet the playability standard.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 162 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the frame rate is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay. The data shows no reason to reduce settings at this resolution, as even the Ultra preset provides more than double the playability threshold.

For 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 107 FPS. This preset comfortably clears the 60 FPS threshold, and the margin of 47 FPS means there is headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios. The benchmark results indicate that 1440p Ultra is the optimal configuration for this hardware, providing both high visual quality and consistent performance.

For 3840x2160, the best settings are High, which averages 76 FPS. While Ultra is technically available, its 59 FPS average falls below the playability threshold, so High is the highest quality preset that maintains at least 60 FPS. The data shows that Medium is also playable at 95 FPS, and Low reaches 121 FPS, but High offers the best combination of visual fidelity and playable performance at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No, the measured data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 59 FPS, which falls just below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The High preset at 4K averages 76 FPS and is the best playable option.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate in the dataset is 331 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the only configuration that exceeds 300 FPS.

Q: How does the i7-12700KF compare to the i7-12700K in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35,365, while the i7-12700K scores 35,287, a delta of 0.2%. The two processors perform nearly identically, so frame rates in Fivem would be essentially the same.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER meaningfully faster than the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The benchmark data shows a -0.1% delta between the two GPUs, with the RTX 4080 SUPER scoring 54,209 and the RTX 4080 scoring 54,247. The performance difference is negligible, so both cards would produce very similar frame rates in Fivem.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: The minimum frame rate at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 146 FPS, with an average of 172 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS. This shows consistent frame delivery without significant dips.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU has more influence at 1080p, as the frame rates are extremely high and the GPU is less saturated. The i7-12700KF's strong single-thread and multithread scores, including a Passmark single thread score of 3,984, help maintain high frame rates at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination ranks 259th out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 7% of all configurations. This high ranking reflects the strong performance demonstrated across the measured FPS data, where the system consistently exceeds the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions except 4K Ultra. The CPU's percentile rank of 85 against all CPUs and the GPU's percentile rank of 86 against all GPUs both indicate that this hardware sits well above average in their respective categories.

The combo's ranking is supported by the synthetic benchmark scores, with the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,838 and the GPU reaching a Passmark G3D score of 34,245. These scores translate directly to the measured frame rates in Fivem, where the system delivers playable performance across nearly the entire settings matrix. The only configuration that falls short is 4K Ultra, which misses the 60 FPS threshold by a single frame, but the overall ranking of 259 out of 3,707 confirms that this is a top-tier combination for this game. The data shows that for users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this hardware provides exceptional performance with room to spare, while 4K users have a viable High preset that maintains smooth gameplay.