Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 93 | 116 | 147 |
| 1440p QHD | 130 | 167 | 209 | 265 |
| 1080p Full HD | 197 | 254 | 317 | 353 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a high-end desktop combination built for demanding multiplayer titles. In Fivem, this combo ranks 27th out of 3,707 tested configurations, placing it in the top tier of systems. The CPU carries a launch MSRP of $409, while the GPU carries a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. Measured frame rates across all resolutions and presets confirm that this system is capable of running the game at well above the 60 FPS threshold, even at maximum settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s position of 27th out of 3,707 tested systems reflects its overall strength in Fivem. That rank puts it ahead of the overwhelming majority of combinations, and the underlying component scores support that standing. The CPU, an Intel Core i7-12700K, achieves an average benchmark score of 35,287 and sits at the 84th percentile of all CPUs tested. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, reaches an average benchmark score of 77,712 and sits at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Together, they produce measured FPS numbers that are consistently high across every resolution and preset combination.
The rank is not just about synthetic scores; the in-game data confirms the hardware’s capability. At 1920x1080, the lowest measured average is 197 FPS (Ultra preset), and at 3840x2160 the lowest average is 72 FPS (Ultra preset). These numbers are far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, meaning the combo never dips into unplayable territory in any tested scenario. The ranking also reflects the fact that the GPU’s high percentile and the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (e.g., Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,784) combine to handle Fivem’s multiplayer load without bottlenecking.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on nearestRivals data, the CPU and GPU each have close synthetic benchmarks that would behave similarly in practice. For the Intel Core i7-12700K, the nearest rivals are:
- Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35,305, deltaPct -0.1)
- Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35,365, deltaPct -0.2)
- Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35,403, deltaPct -0.3)
- Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35,428, deltaPct -0.4)
These CPUs are all within 0.4% of the i7-12700K’s average benchmark score, meaning they would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The i7-12700KF is essentially the same chip without integrated graphics, and the i5-13600T offers similar multi-threaded throughput despite a different core configuration.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, the nearest rivals are:
- AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (avg score 76,904, deltaPct 1.1)
- AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (avg score 78,940, deltaPct -1.6)
- NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (avg score 79,396, deltaPct -2.1)
- NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (avg score 79,605, deltaPct -2.4)
These GPUs are within 2.4% of the RTX 5090 D’s average score, so they would produce similar frame rates in Fivem. The RX 6850M XT and Tesla P100 cards are particularly close, though the RTX 5090 D’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and Blackwell architecture give it an edge in memory-heavy scenarios. For practical purposes, swapping in any of these alternatives would yield comparable gameplay performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high, with Low preset hitting 353 FPS and Ultra still reaching 197 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 156 FPS, indicating that the GPU has plenty of headroom even at maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the Low preset drops to 265 FPS and Ultra to 130 FPS, a gap of 135 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low yields 147 FPS and Ultra yields 72 FPS, a gap of 75 FPS.
This pattern shows that the absolute performance penalty from enabling Ultra settings shrinks as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU is not fully taxed, so the CPU can push very high frame rates, and the preset change causes a large swing. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and the relative impact of preset changes is smaller. The fact that even 4K Low produces 147 FPS indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution; the GPU is the dominant factor at higher pixel counts. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores (e.g., PassMark single-thread 4,013, 3DMark single-thread 1,043) allow the system to exceed 300 FPS on lower presets, demonstrating that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem with complete confidence. According to the verdict data, every resolution tested (3840x2160, 2560x1440, 1920x1080) has all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) listed as playable, meaning they all maintain an average FPS of 60 or higher. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 72 at 4K, 130 at 1440p, and 197 at 1080p. There is no scenario in the measured data where the system falls below the playable threshold. Even the most demanding combination — 4K Ultra — stays comfortably above 60 FPS, and the minimum FPS recorded for any preset (99 FPS at 4K Medium) is still well above the threshold. In short, the combo delivers a smooth experience at maximum quality on any monitor up to 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following are the exact measured average frame rates (and min/max where available) for each resolution and preset:
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: avg 147 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Medium: avg 116 FPS, min 99 FPS, max 133 FPS
- High: avg 93 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Ultra: avg 72 FPS (no min/max reported)
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: avg 265 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Medium: avg 209 FPS, min 178 FPS, max 240 FPS
- High: avg 167 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Ultra: avg 130 FPS (no min/max reported)
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: avg 353 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Medium: avg 317 FPS, min 270 FPS, max 365 FPS
- High: avg 254 FPS (no min/max reported)
- Ultra: avg 197 FPS (no min/max reported)
The medium preset is the only one with reported minimum and maximum values, and those figures confirm that even the worst-case dips (e.g., 99 FPS at 4K Medium) remain far above 60 FPS. The lack of min/max for other presets does not affect the verdict, as the averages are decisively high.
Best Settings per Resolution
At each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra. The measured average FPS at Ultra are:
- 3840x2160: Ultra at 72 FPS — this is the highest quality setting and still clears the threshold by 12 FPS.
- 2560x1440: Ultra at 130 FPS — more than double the 60 FPS requirement.
- 1920x1080: Ultra at 197 FPS — over three times the threshold.
Because Ultra is the maximum preset available in the test, there is no higher setting to consider. The data shows that this combo can run Fivem at the highest visual quality on any resolution up to 4K without sacrificing smoothness. If a player prefers even higher frame rates for competitive play, they can drop to High or Medium, which yield substantially higher averages (e.g., 167 FPS at 1440p High, 254 FPS at 1080p High), but the Ultra preset already provides a comfortable margin.