Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 87 | 109 | 138 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 157 | 196 | 248 |
| 1080p Full HD | 185 | 238 | 297 | 353 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, with benchmark results showing every tested resolution and preset combination clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data indicates this combination is positioned at rank 77 out of 3707 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 2% of all tested hardware pairings. The measured frame rates scale impressively across resolutions, from an average of 353 FPS at 1080p Low settings down to 67 FPS at 4K Ultra, demonstrating that this system has substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions while still maintaining smooth gameplay at maximum settings in 4K.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 353, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. At Medium settings in 1080p, the average drops to 297 FPS, while High settings produce 238 FPS and Ultra settings yield 185 FPS.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 67, which sits 7 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 4K resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842, placing it 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (score 79605) and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (score 78940). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, putting it 1.4% higher than the RTX 5090.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 248 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 122 FPS. This represents a 126 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality presets, with Medium settings at 196 FPS and High at 157 FPS.
Q: Is the Core i7-12700K significantly faster than its closest rival?
A: The Core i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35287, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 (0.1% higher), the Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 (0.2% higher), and the Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (0.3% higher). The differences are negligible, under 0.4% across all four rivals.
Q: What is the lowest measured minimum FPS for this combo?
A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 92, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings (average 109 FPS, maximum 125 FPS). At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 166 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 253 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU benchmark data shows the Intel Core i7-12700K performing within a tight cluster of rivals. The Intel Core i5-13600T posts an average score of 35305, just 0.1% below the i7-12700K's 35287. The Intel Core i7-12700KF achieves 35365, a 0.2% difference, while the Intel Core i7-13700T reaches 35403, 0.3% higher. The Intel Core 5 213PE tops this group at 35428, 0.4% above. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem, given the game's demonstrated reliance on GPU performance at higher resolutions.
For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090's average benchmark score of 79842 places it among some surprising company. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605 (0.3% lower), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940 (1.1% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4% higher than the RTX 5090. While these rival GPUs may have different feature sets, their benchmark similarity suggests they would produce comparable frame rates in Fivem under identical CPU conditions.
The measured FPS data reveals that Fivem is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 71 FPS (138 vs 67), while at 1080p the difference is 168 FPS (353 vs 185). This scaling pattern indicates that the CPU, despite being a strong performer in its own right (84th percentile among all CPUs), becomes less of a bottleneck as resolution increases. Users considering alternative hardware should look at GPUs in the RTX 5090's performance tier for 4K playability, while CPU choice matters more for maximizing frame rates at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows the highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings deliver an average of 353 FPS, making this preset ideal for competitive play or extremely high refresh rate monitors. Medium settings produce 297 FPS average with a minimum of 253 and maximum of 342, providing a substantial buffer above any display refresh rate. High settings yield 238 FPS average, while Ultra settings still maintain a strong 185 FPS average. All four presets at 1080p far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding settings more than tripling that baseline.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high but shows expected scaling. Low settings average 248 FPS, Medium averages 196 FPS with a minimum of 166 and maximum of 225, High averages 157 FPS, and Ultra averages 122 FPS. The 1440p results demonstrate that this combo can drive high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors at maximum settings, as the 122 FPS Ultra average still doubles the playable threshold.
At 3840x2160, the performance remains solidly playable across all presets. Low settings average 138 FPS, Medium averages 109 FPS with a minimum of 92 and maximum of 125, High averages 87 FPS, and Ultra averages 67 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measured preset that comes close to the 60 FPS threshold, but it still clears it by 7 FPS. The minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium (92) is notably higher than the average at 4K Ultra (67), suggesting that players wanting guaranteed high minimum frame rates might prefer Medium settings at 4K.
The Verdict
The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Fivem at all tested resolutions and settings combinations. At 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are classified as playable, with Ultra settings achieving an average of 67 FPS, which is 7 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings choice at 4K is Ultra, as it provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining playable performance.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is even more decisive. All four presets are playable, with Ultra settings delivering an average of 122 FPS — more than double the playable threshold. The best settings at 1440p is Ultra, offering both maximum visual fidelity and a frame rate that comfortably supports high refresh rate displays (120Hz+). The 1920x1080 results show complete dominance, with Ultra settings averaging 185 FPS and all presets far exceeding any practical display refresh rate.
For users prioritizing the highest possible frame rates, the 1080p Low preset at 353 FPS enables esports-tier responsiveness, while 1080p Ultra at 185 FPS remains superb for quality-conscious players. The verdict across all resolutions is unambiguous: this system never drops below 60 FPS in any measured configuration, making it a top-tier choice for Fivem at any display resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals distinct scaling patterns that indicate which component drives performance at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high across all settings, with the gap between Low (353 FPS) and Ultra (185 FPS) being 168 FPS. This 47.6% drop from Low to Ultra suggests that at 1080p, both CPU and GPU are heavily engaged, with the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1043) playing a significant role in sustaining these high frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the scaling from Low (248 FPS) to Ultra (122 FPS) shows a 126 FPS difference, representing a 50.8% reduction. The absolute frame rates remain very high, indicating the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability is sufficient to handle the increased pixel count while the CPU continues to feed it effectively. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings shows a 63 FPS drop (185 to 122), which is proportionally larger than the resolution increase alone would suggest, pointing to increasing GPU workload.
At 3840x2160, the pattern shifts more decisively toward GPU limitation. The Low to Ultra spread is 71 FPS (138 to 67), a 48.6% reduction. Crucially, the 4K Ultra average of 67 FPS is the only measured result close to the playable threshold, indicating that at 4K, the RTX 5090's rendering load becomes the dominant constraint. The CPU's role diminishes at higher resolutions — the data shows that moving from 1080p Ultra (185 FPS) to 4K Ultra (67 FPS) represents a 63.8% performance reduction, which aligns with the GPU handling approximately four times the pixel throughput at 4K versus 1080p.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 77th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 2.1% of all hardware pairings tested for this game. This ranking is notable given that the individual components have percentile rankings of 84 (CPU) and 92 (GPU) against all respective hardware, suggesting the combination performs slightly better in Fivem than the CPU's standalone percentile would imply.
The combination's high rank is supported by the measured FPS data showing no configuration below 67 FPS average. In context, this means the combo outperforms 3630 other tested combinations, with only 76 combos achieving higher performance in Fivem. The rank reflects the synergy between the 12-core, 20-thread i7-12700K (which scores 9979 in 3DMark max threads) and the RTX 5090's massive 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, which proves particularly effective in this multiplayer title.
For perspective, the combo rank of 77 suggests that users seeking even higher performance would need to look at top-tier enthusiast hardware combinations, likely featuring newer generation flagship CPUs paired with the RTX 5090 or its direct successor. The data shows this rank is achieved while maintaining playable performance at all settings, including the most demanding 4K Ultra configuration, which not all high-end combos may accomplish in Fivem's multiplayer environments.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra settings, which achieves an average of 185 FPS. This provides maximum visual quality while maintaining a frame rate that is over three times the playable threshold. The 1080p Ultra configuration is recommended for users with high refresh rate monitors up to 180Hz, while those with 240Hz+ displays could still consider High settings at 238 FPS for additional responsiveness.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings again represent the best choice, delivering an average of 122 FPS. This configuration clears the 60 FPS threshold by more than double, making it suitable for 120Hz displays at full quality settings. The 1440p Ultra result of 122 FPS compares favorably to the 1080p High result of 238 FPS, showing that the resolution upgrade costs 116 FPS but remains entirely playable.
At 3840x2160, Ultra settings remain viable with an average of 67 FPS, which is 7 FPS above the playable threshold. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset comes within close proximity to 60 FPS, and users who prioritize guaranteed smoothness over absolute maximum quality might opt for High settings at 87 FPS, which provides a 20 FPS buffer over Ultra while still maintaining high visual fidelity. The 4K Medium preset at 109 FPS offers the best combination of frame rate headroom and quality for users with 100Hz+ 4K displays, though the measured minimum of 92 FPS at Medium confirms strong consistency.