Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 49 | 62 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 89 | 111 | 141 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 135 | 169 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 1575th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the 42.5th percentile of all tested hardware pairings for this specific multiplayer title. This mid-pack positioning reflects a combination that is neither at the bleeding edge nor struggling to keep pace, with the measured data showing that the pair clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution tested except for the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The 1575th rank out of 3707 combos places this configuration slightly above the median of all tested systems in Fivem. The CPU’s 84th percentile standing among all processors, combined with the GPU’s 61st percentile among all graphics cards, produces a balanced pairing that leans on the processor’s relative strength. The data indicates that the i7-12700K is a stronger component relative to its peers than the RTX 3070 is relative to its own competition, which becomes relevant when analyzing which part drives performance at lower resolutions.
The combo’s overall position suggests that while this system will not top any leaderboards in Fivem, it sits comfortably within the upper half of tested configurations. Benchmark results show the CPU achieving an average benchmark score of 35287, while the GPU averages 17208 across its test suite. These aggregate numbers, when viewed against the in-game rank, indicate that the system’s performance in Fivem is roughly in line with what its component-level scores would predict, rather than being held back by a bottleneck or boosted by an unusually favorable optimization.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-12700K are all within a fraction of a percent in average benchmark score. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a delta of -0.1% from the i7-12700K’s 35287 average. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (-0.4%). Any of these processors would deliver statistically indistinguishable performance in Fivem, meaning a system built around one of these chips would behave nearly identically to the i7-12700K in this game.
On the graphics side, the RTX 3070’s nearest rivals show slightly more variance. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17083, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070’s 17208 average. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468 (1.5% higher). For Fivem specifically, the RX 7600 XT is the most relevant alternative, as it is the only modern gaming card in this group. The GTX 690, HD 7970M, and Tesla K40c are older or specialized hardware that would not represent sensible substitutes in a real-world build, but their benchmark proximity suggests that the RTX 3070 sits in a performance band where minor architectural differences do not translate into meaningful FPS gaps in this title.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between the two components. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as the frame rates are high enough to expose processor limitations. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p shows a drop from 214 FPS to 105 FPS, a 51% reduction that is driven by both GPU load and CPU-side game logic. At 2560x1440, the same settings range produces a drop from 141 FPS to 69 FPS, a 51% reduction as well, indicating that the proportional impact of settings remains consistent even as the resolution increases.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Ultra preset drops to 38 FPS, while Low still manages 78 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 40 FPS, compared to 109 FPS at 1080p and 72 FPS at 1440p. This compression of the settings range at higher resolutions is a classic sign of GPU saturation. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and multi-thread score of 9979 indicate ample headroom, but the GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the limiting factors as pixel count rises. The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the i7-12700K keeps pace with the RTX 3070, but at 4K, the graphics card’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width constrain performance regardless of CPU capability.
The Verdict
The measured FPS data shows that this system can run Fivem at 60 FPS or above across all tested resolution and settings combinations, with one exception. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 38 FPS, and the High preset averages 49 FPS, both falling below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Medium preset at 4K averages 62 FPS and qualifies as playable, as does the Low preset at 78 FPS.
At 2560x1440, all four settings presets clear the threshold. The lowest performing preset, Ultra, averages 69 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS line. At 1920x1080, even the most demanding Ultra preset averages 105 FPS, with Low reaching 214 FPS. The verdict is clear: this system is fully capable of running Fivem at high frame rates for the vast majority of users, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra is not viable and 4K High falls short of the 60 FPS target.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 214 FPS. Medium averages 169 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS. High averages 135 FPS, and Ultra averages 105 FPS. The minimum and maximum values are only provided for the Medium preset at this resolution, so the range for other presets is not available in the data.
Moving to 2560x1440, Low averages 141 FPS. Medium averages 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. High averages 89 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a tighter minimum-to-maximum spread than its 1080p counterpart, suggesting more consistent frame pacing at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, Low averages 78 FPS. Medium averages 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 38 FPS. The 4K Medium preset’s minimum of 52 FPS dips below the 60 FPS threshold, meaning that while the average is playable, there will be moments of noticeable slowdown. The 4K High and Ultra presets are clearly below playable levels, with averages of 49 FPS and 38 FPS respectively.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 105 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it still provides a 45 FPS buffer above the playability threshold, indicating that the system has substantial headroom at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 69 FPS. This is only 9 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, so while it is playable, there is less margin for error compared to 1080p. Users who prefer a stricter frame rate target might consider High at 89 FPS, but the data supports Ultra as the optimal choice for visual quality without dropping below playable levels.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Medium, averaging 62 FPS. This is just 2 FPS above the threshold, and the minimum observed FPS of 52 means that some scenes will fall below 60 FPS. Low at 78 FPS provides a more comfortable experience, but for users who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate consistency, Medium is the maximum setting that stays at or above the average 60 FPS target.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the system averages 38 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which averages 62 FPS.
Q: What is the highest frame rate this combo can achieve in Fivem?
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 214 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The maximum FPS recorded in any tested configuration is 194 FPS, which occurs at 1080p Medium.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: At the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops from 105 FPS at 1920x1080 to 69 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 36 FPS. At the Low preset, the drop is from 214 FPS to 141 FPS, a reduction of 73 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem at 1440p?
A: The data shows a 51% reduction in average FPS from Low to Ultra at both 1080p and 1440p, indicating that settings changes have a similar proportional impact at both resolutions. The GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the Ultra preset averages only 38 FPS.
Q: Does the Medium preset at 4K stay above 60 FPS at all times?
A: No. While the average is 62 FPS, the minimum recorded FPS is 52, meaning some scenes will dip below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 4K averages 78 FPS and provides a more consistent experience.
Q: How does this system compare to the RTX 3070’s nearest rival, the RX 7600 XT?
A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070’s 17208. In Fivem, this difference would translate to a negligible FPS gap, with both cards delivering effectively identical performance in this title.