Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a playable experience in Fivem at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K remains out of reach. The measured data shows a clear performance ceiling at 3840x2160, where even the Low preset only manages an average of 50 FPS, falling short of the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 50 FPS, Medium drops to 39 FPS with minimums of 33 and maximums of 45, High yields 31 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 24 FPS. None of these configurations reach the 60 FPS playability mark, making 4K unsuitable for this pairing in Fivem.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves significantly. Low settings deliver an average of 89 FPS, Medium achieves 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 and maximum of 81, High reaches 56 FPS, and Ultra sits at 44 FPS. The Medium preset is the sweet spot, as it is the most demanding settings level that maintains an average above 60 FPS, while Low offers headroom for high-refresh monitors.

At 1920x1080, the Intel Core i7-12700K and Intel Arc B570 perform admirably across the board. Low settings reach 136 FPS, Medium produces 107 FPS with minimums of 91 and maximums of 123, High achieves 86 FPS, and Ultra holds at 67 FPS. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra providing the best visual quality while remaining comfortably playable.

The scaling between resolutions is steep. Dropping from 1080p Low to 1440p Low reduces the average from 136 to 89 FPS, a 47 FPS loss. The same pattern appears at Higher settings: 1080p High at 86 FPS falls to 1440p High at 56 FPS, a 30 FPS drop, and then to 4K High at 31 FPS. This indicates the Arc B570’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are taxed heavily as pixel count increases.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-12700K sits in a tight performance cluster. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T, scores 35305 in average benchmarks, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365, 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i7-13700T reaches 35403, 0.3% above. The Intel Core 5 213PE completes the group with 35428, 0.4% higher. For Fivem, swapping to any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates, as the differences fall well within run-to-run variance.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570’s closest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with an average score of 20534, just 0.1% lower, and the Intel Arc A750 at 20582, 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% below, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X reaches 20662, 0.5% above. In practical terms, these GPUs would deliver similar FPS in Fivem, though the Arc B570’s 10 GB of memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth give it a slight edge in texture-heavy multiplayer scenarios.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35287 places it in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded capability. The GPU’s average score of 20556 puts it in the 65th percentile for GPUs, a more mid-range position. This asymmetrical ranking means the GPU is the limiting factor in most Fivem workloads, particularly at higher resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role relative to the GPU. The i7-12700K’s 12 cores and 20 threads handle Fivem’s multiplayer scripting and physics well, as evidenced by the 136 FPS average at Low settings. The Arc B570 still has room to spare at this resolution, so frame rates are more likely to be constrained by the CPU’s single-thread performance in busy areas with many players.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The 47 FPS drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows the Arc B570’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are being pushed harder. At Medium settings, the 71 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum suggests the GPU is near its limits, while the CPU still has headroom.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The 50 FPS average at Low settings, compared to 136 FPS at 1080p Low, represents a 63% reduction in performance. This aligns with the Arc B570’s 160-bit memory bus and 10 GB GDDR6 configuration, which are adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for 4K gaming in Fivem. The CPU’s 25 MB of L3 cache and 125 W TDP are not the limiting factors here.

The scaling between presets at each resolution further clarifies the GPU’s role. At 1440p, increasing from Low to Medium costs 18 FPS (89 to 71), while Medium to High costs 15 FPS (71 to 56). At 1080p, the same transitions cost 29 FPS (136 to 107) and 21 FPS (107 to 86), respectively. The smaller deltas at 1440p indicate the GPU is running closer to its capacity, whereas at 1080p, the CPU can more easily feed the GPU with data.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average is 50 FPS at Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS playability threshold. Ultra settings produce only 24 FPS, making 4K unplayable for this combination.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60. Low settings offer higher performance at 89 FPS, but Medium provides a better visual experience while maintaining playability.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750 in this game?

A: The two GPUs are nearly identical in performance. The Arc B570 scores 20556 in average benchmarks, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a difference of only 0.1%. In Fivem, players would notice no practical difference in frame rates between the two.

Q: Which component is more important for Fivem at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a larger role. The i7-12700K’s 12 cores and 20 threads handle multiplayer workloads efficiently, and the Arc B570 has enough performance to keep up. The 136 FPS average at Low settings suggests the CPU is the primary driver of frame rates in less demanding scenes.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700K worth keeping for this build?

A: Yes. The CPU scores 35287 in average benchmarks, ranking in the 84th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T, is only 0.1% faster, so upgrading would yield minimal gains in Fivem. The processor’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 25 MB of L3 cache provide ample headroom for this game.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at Ultra settings in 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system produces an average of 67 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS playability threshold, though it leaves less margin for demanding multiplayer scenarios with many vehicles or players on screen.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700K and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2980 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. This ranking reflects the GPU’s 65th percentile position among all GPUs, which drags down an otherwise strong CPU. The i7-12700K’s 84th percentile ranking shows the processor is capable, but the Arc B570’s mid-range performance limits the overall system.

This rank is consistent with the measured FPS data. The system handles 1080p and 1440p well, but the lack of 4K capability pushes it down the rankings relative to combos with more powerful GPUs. The 0.1% to 0.5% differences from the CPU’s nearest rivals mean that swapping processors would not significantly change the combo’s rank, while upgrading the GPU to something like the Arc A750 would also have minimal impact due to the 0.1% performance gap.

For context, the combo sits near the bottom quartile of tested systems, which aligns with the Arc B570’s modest specifications: 2304 shading units, 80 ROPs, and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These figures are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but do not compete with higher-tier GPUs in the database.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS playability threshold. The closest is Low with 50 FPS, but this still falls short, so there is no recommended setting for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS. This provides smooth gameplay while maintaining moderate visual quality. Low settings at 89 FPS are also viable for players prioritizing frame rate over visuals, but Medium is the highest quality option that meets the 60 FPS requirement.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, achieving an average of 67 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that stays above the 60 FPS threshold, offering the highest visual fidelity available. Players with high-refresh monitors can also use Low settings for 136 FPS or Medium for 107 FPS, but Ultra provides the best balance of image quality and performance for standard 60 Hz displays.