Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
368 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
178 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
243 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
121 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
67 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 67 82 109 136
1440p QHD 121 150 189 243
1080p Full HD 178 231 291 368

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 231
1920x1080 Low 368
1920x1080 Medium 291
1920x1080 Ultra 178
2560x1440 High 150
2560x1440 Low 243
2560x1440 Medium 189
2560x1440 Ultra 121
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 136
3840x2160 Medium 109
3840x2160 Ultra 67

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 represents a high-end desktop configuration, and the measured data for Fivem shows that this pairing is overwhelmingly capable across all tested resolutions. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake part, and the GPU, an Ada Lovelace flagship, combine to deliver frame rates that consistently exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, often by a wide margin. The data indicates that this system is not merely playable but is positioned to handle the game with significant headroom, allowing for maximum visual settings even at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-14600KF sits in a performance tier with several close competitors. Its average benchmark score of 49394 places it within a tight cluster of other high-end desktop and mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is its nearest rival, with an average score of 49228, a mere 0.3% difference. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 are also within a 0.8% delta, posting scores of 49196 and 48995, respectively. On the other side of the spectrum, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores slightly higher at 49796, which is a -0.8% delta from the Core i5. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios within Fivem, users would experience nearly identical performance with any of these processors, as the differences are statistically negligible.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are a mix of professional and workstation cards. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches its average score of 60347 almost exactly, with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is also close, with a score of 60140 and a 0.3% delta. The data shows the RTX 4090's score is 2.5% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M's 61896, and 2.9% below the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 58657. While these specific cards are not typical consumer gaming alternatives, the benchmark scores indicate that the RTX 4090's raw compute performance is in a specific tier. For Fivem, this means the GPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck at lower resolutions, and its performance class is sufficient to drive high frame rates even at 4K.

The implication for similar performance is clear: a system built with any of the CPUs mentioned above, paired with a GPU whose benchmark score is within a few percent of the RTX 4090, would produce frame rates in Fivem that are effectively indistinguishable from this tested configuration. The data from the measured FPS tests shows that the GPU is so powerful that the game's frame rate is likely more dependent on the CPU, making the choice between these rival CPUs even less impactful.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured FPS data for this combination provides clear guidance on the best settings for a 60 FPS target. The "best settings" are defined as the most demanding preset that still maintains an average frame rate at or above the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160 (4K), all settings presets are playable. The data shows that even the Ultra preset, the most demanding, achieves an average of 67.4 FPS. This makes Ultra the best settings choice at this resolution, as it provides the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS bar.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system has ample headroom. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 120.5 FPS, which is double the playable threshold. Therefore, Ultra is the recommended setting, offering a high level of detail at a frame rate that is smooth for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the CPU becomes the primary driver of performance, and the frame rates are exceptionally high. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 177.6 FPS. This is the best setting to choose, as it maximizes visual fidelity without compromising the high frame rate.

The data shows a consistent pattern: this hardware combination can run Fivem at its maximum visual settings at every resolution tested, with the 4K Ultra setting being the only one that dips below 100 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the scaling of frame rates across resolutions and settings reveals the relative importance of the CPU and GPU in Fivem. The data strongly suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, while the GPU becomes more influential at higher resolutions.

The performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K is not linear, which indicates a shift in the bottleneck. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 177.6 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it produces 120.5 FPS, a decrease of 32%. Moving to 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 67.4 FPS, a further 44% decrease. This significant drop at higher resolutions is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the primary constraint as the pixel count increases.

The CPU's role is more evident when looking at the scaling between settings at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 190.4 FPS (from 368 to 177.6). This massive gap shows that the CPU has enough headroom to drive the game logic at very high frame rates, and the GPU's workload changes with the settings. However, even at 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 68.6 FPS (from 136 to 67.4), showing the GPU's workload still scales significantly. The data implies that while the GPU is essential for rendering at high resolutions, the Core i5-14600KF is robust enough to never be a significant bottleneck, even at 1080p with very high frame rates. The RTX 4090 is the component that dictates the performance ceiling at 4K, while the CPU's strong single-threaded performance, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 score of 4594, ensures high minimum frame rates in less demanding scenes.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average frame rate of 67.4 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, achieving an average of 120.5 FPS. All other settings (Low, Medium, High) also produce higher frame rates.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU is more critical at 1080p, as the frame rates are extremely high (368 FPS on Low), indicating the GPU is not heavily burdened and the CPU's processing power is the main driver of the high results.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This specific combination of Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 111th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 3% of all configurations.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 4K with Medium settings?

A: The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Medium settings is 108.7 FPS.

Q: Does this system ever drop below 60 FPS?

A: No. The lowest average FPS recorded in the measured data is 67.4 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still above the playable threshold. All other settings and resolutions yield higher average frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is the complete set of measured average frame rates for this hardware configuration in Fivem.

At 3840x2160:

  • Low: 136 FPS
  • Medium: 108.7 FPS
  • High: 82.4 FPS
  • Ultra: 67.4 FPS

At 2560x1440:

  • Low: 242.7 FPS
  • Medium: 188.7 FPS
  • High: 150 FPS
  • Ultra: 120.5 FPS

At 1920x1080:

  • Low: 368 FPS
  • Medium: 290.6 FPS
  • High: 230.8 FPS
  • Ultra: 177.6 FPS

The data shows a clear hierarchy: performance scales down as resolution and settings increase, as expected. The most demanding configuration, 4K Ultra, still delivers a playable 67.4 FPS, while the least demanding, 1080p Low, achieves 368 FPS. The variance between settings is substantial, with a 198.4 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p, and a 68.6 FPS difference at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested configurations for Fivem, this combination of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 holds a rank of 111 out of 3707 total combos. This places the system in the top 3% of all tested hardware pairings. This high ranking is a direct reflection of the measured performance, which shows that the system can easily handle the game at maximum settings across all resolutions. The ranking indicates that while there are a small number of configurations that perform better, this combo is among the elite for Fivem, providing a level of performance that far exceeds the requirements of most users. The percentile data for the individual components also supports this, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile, indicating both are top-tier parts.

The Verdict

The verdict data is unequivocal: this PC can run Fivem exceptionally well. At 3840x2160, the system is playable at all settings, with the best playable setting being Ultra at an average of 67.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, it is playable at all settings, with Ultra achieving 120.5 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system is also playable at all settings, with Ultra delivering 177.6 FPS. The data confirms that this configuration clears the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. The only area where the system is pushed is 4K Ultra, but it still maintains a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. For any user with a 60Hz, 144Hz, or even 240Hz monitor, this hardware provides more than enough performance to take full advantage of the display's capabilities. This is a high-end system that leaves little to be desired for Fivem.