Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
289 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
141 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
93 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
105 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
5.5ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 65 81 105
1440p QHD 93 120 149 191
1080p Full HD 141 181 229 289

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 181
1920x1080 Low 289
1920x1080 Medium 229
1920x1080 Ultra 141
2560x1440 High 120
2560x1440 Low 191
2560x1440 Medium 149
2560x1440 Ultra 93
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Low 105
3840x2160 Medium 81
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a broad range of frame rates in Fivem, scaling from a comfortable 52.2 FPS at 4K Ultra to a very high 289.2 FPS at 1080p Low. The measured data shows that this combination is consistently above the 60 FPS playability threshold for the majority of tested configurations, with only the most demanding preset at the highest resolution falling short. The performance envelope is wide, indicating that users have substantial headroom to prioritize visual fidelity or competitive frame rates depending on their display and preferences.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for Fivem are organized by resolution and graphics preset, with average FPS recorded for each combination. At 3840x2160, the lowest tested preset, Low, yields an average of 105 FPS. Moving up to Medium produces 80.9 FPS, and High achieves 65 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset at this resolution drops below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 52.2 FPS.

At 2560x1440, all four presets clear the playability threshold comfortably. The Low preset delivers an average of 190.7 FPS, while Medium reaches 149.3 FPS. High settings produce 120.2 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a strong 93.2 FPS average. This resolution offers a balanced mix of visual quality and performance, with no preset falling below the 60 FPS mark.

The 1920x1080 results show the highest performance ceiling. Low settings average 289.2 FPS, Medium reaches 229.2 FPS, and High delivers 180.7 FPS. The Ultra preset remains highly playable at 141.3 FPS. Across all resolutions, the scaling between presets is consistent, with Low to Medium showing a roughly 20-25% drop, Medium to High another 20-25% drop, and High to Ultra a further 20-25% reduction. The data shows no min or max FPS values recorded, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 650th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places the combo in the top 17.5% of all tested systems. The rank reflects the aggregate performance across all resolutions and presets, not just a single configuration. Given that the combo achieves 60+ FPS at 4K High and 90+ FPS at 1440p Ultra, the high percentile ranking is consistent with the measured frame rates. The rank also suggests that many other combinations in the database are either less powerful or optimized differently, as this pairing shows strong headroom even at higher resolutions.

The percentile positioning of the CPU and GPU individually supports this ranking. The Intel Core i5-14600KF sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is at the 83rd percentile among GPUs. The combination of a top-decile processor and a top-quintile graphics card produces a system that is well-balanced for Fivem, which appears to respond favorably to both CPU and GPU resources depending on the settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is identified as the best setting. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 65 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 52.2 FPS, so High is the maximum playable quality. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 93.2 FPS, making it the best setting for this resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset also leads, delivering 141.3 FPS, which provides a high degree of smoothness for fast-paced multiplayer action.

The data indicates that 4K gaming with this combo requires a slight compromise on settings, while 1440p and 1080p allow for maximum quality without sacrificing playability. The gap between 4K Ultra and 4K High is 12.8 FPS, which is significant enough to warrant the drop for a consistent experience. At lower resolutions, the margin above 60 FPS is so large that even the most demanding settings do not stress the system.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for the CPU and GPU provides context for hardware that would perform similarly in this benchmark suite. For the Intel Core i5-14600KF, the closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with a negligible 0.3% difference in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% ahead. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning that swapping the i5-14600KF for any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, assuming the GPU remains unchanged.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is 0.1% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is also 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 is 0.2% behind, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 1% ahead. These are all very close scores, indicating that a system with the RTX 4070 SUPER would behave almost identically to one with any of these GPUs, again assuming the CPU is held constant. For a user considering alternatives, any of these CPUs or GPUs would yield a similar experience in Fivem, with the RTX 4090 Mobile offering a marginal improvement and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 providing a slight CPU-side edge.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling of frame rates across resolutions and presets reveals which component is the limiting factor at each setting. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, ranging from 141.3 FPS on Ultra to 289.2 FPS on Low. This suggests that the GPU is not the primary bottleneck at this resolution; even the Ultra preset does not push the RTX 4070 SUPER to its limit. The CPU, with its high single-core performance, is likely driving these frame rates, as Fivem is known for being sensitive to single-thread performance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop by roughly 35-40% across all presets compared to 1080p. For example, Ultra goes from 141.3 to 93.2 FPS, and Low goes from 289.2 to 190.7 FPS. This consistent drop indicates that the GPU is beginning to become more involved, but the CPU still has headroom, as the frame rates remain well above 60 FPS even on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the drop is more pronounced: Ultra falls to 52.2 FPS, while High is 65 FPS. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K, particularly at Ultra settings, shows that the GPU is now the limiting factor. The CPU is likely still capable of delivering higher frame rates, but the GPU cannot render the increased pixel count fast enough.

The data shows a clear shift: at 1080p, the CPU is the primary driver; at 1440p, the balance tips toward the GPU but remains manageable; at 4K, the GPU becomes the hard limit. The fact that 4K Ultra drops below 60 FPS while 4K High stays above it indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER's memory bandwidth and compute resources are taxed heavily at this resolution, whereas the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are sufficient even at 4K.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem successfully across nearly all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold with significant margins; the lowest result is 141.3 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra averaging 93.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is playable on Low, Medium, and High presets, with the latter averaging 65 FPS. The only configuration that does not reach 60 FPS is 4K Ultra, which averages 52.2 FPS. For users with a 4K display, the High preset is the recommended maximum, but for 1440p and 1080p displays, the Ultra preset is fully playable and delivers smooth performance. The combination of a top-10% CPU and a top-20% GPU provides a well-rounded experience that will handle Fivem's multiplayer demands without issue.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest settings preset that stays above 60 FPS at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding that remains playable, averaging 65 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 52.2 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 1440p with maximum settings?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 93.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 650th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 17.5% of all configurations.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i5-14600KF and its closest CPU rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is the nearest rival, with a delta of 0.3% in average benchmark score. This difference is negligible in real-world Fivem performance.

Q: Which GPU is the closest competitor to the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is the nearest rival, scoring just 0.1% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER in average benchmark score.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the frame rates are very high across all presets, indicating the GPU is not the bottleneck. The CPU's strong single-thread performance is likely the primary driver of frame rates at this resolution.