Fivem

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14600KF sits in a tight cluster of competing processors according to the database's aggregate benchmark scores. Its average score of 49,394 places it within 1% of several nearby chips. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228, which is 0.3% behind the i5-14600KF, making it effectively a peer in raw multi-threaded work. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G follows at 49,196, just 0.4% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 lands at 48,995, a 0.8% gap. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 posts 49,796, which is 0.8% ahead of the i5-14600KF. These four rivals bracket the i5-14600KF so tightly that any of them would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem. The processor ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, so it is positioned well above the typical desktop chip.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20,282, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, which is 1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, also 1.2% ahead. The Intel Arc B570 posts 20,556, a 1.3% lead, and the Intel Arc A750 reaches 20,582, 1.5% higher. These deltas are small, meaning a system with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU would produce similar frame rates in Fivem at the same settings. The RTX 2070 SUPER is not dramatically faster or slower than these alternatives; it sits squarely in the middle of a competitive range. Gamers upgrading from the RTX 2070 SUPER to one of these cards should expect negligible FPS movement, while those downgrading from a slightly faster card would lose only a few percent.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined configuration of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2,262nd out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. That places it in the upper-middle portion of the database, roughly at the 61st percentile of all tested systems. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's mid-tier rasterization capability. A rank of 2,262 does not indicate a top-tier gaming machine, but it is far from the bottom. Many tested combinations fall below this pairing, and the data shows it outperforms a substantial majority of systems. The combo rank is a holistic measure, and it aligns with the measured FPS results that show playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, with only marginal results at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database includes measured average FPS for this combo across three resolutions and four quality presets. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded, so the analysis relies on average frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo delivers strong results across the board. Low settings produce 174.6 FPS average, which is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 135.5 FPS, still a comfortable margin. High settings yield 107.6 FPS, and Ultra settings hold at 86.4 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at 1080p clears the playable threshold by a wide margin. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction of 88.2 FPS, a 50.5% drop, but every preset remains fluid.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates step down noticeably. Low settings average 113.4 FPS, which is still well above 60 FPS. Medium settings produce 91.3 FPS. High settings deliver 71.3 FPS, which clears the playable threshold but with less headroom. Ultra settings fall to 58.3 FPS, just 1.7 FPS below the 60 FPS mark, making it the first preset at any resolution that fails to meet the playable standard. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 55.1 FPS, a 48.6% reduction.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 2070 SUPER begins to struggle. Low settings average 63.6 FPS, barely clearing the threshold. Medium settings drop to 50.3 FPS, and High settings fall to 37.7 FPS. Ultra settings produce only 28.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 35.2 FPS, a 55.3% reduction. Only the Low preset at 4K is playable, and even that has just 3.6 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS line.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution and quality settings. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra stays above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 86.4 FPS, so players can enable maximum quality and still have a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding option that maintains playable performance, averaging 71.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls short at 58.3 FPS, so it is not recommended for a consistent 60 FPS experience. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset reaches playable levels, with an average of 63.6 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 50.3, 37.7, and 28.4 FPS respectively. The verdict is clear: this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming at any quality, or 1440p gaming at High settings or lower. For 4K, players must accept Low settings and a narrow margin above the playable line.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the balance shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the GPU has enough headroom that the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor. The i5-14600KF, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,445, can feed frames quickly. The RTX 2070 SUPER at 1080p Low produces 174.6 FPS, which suggests the CPU is doing the heavy lifting. As settings increase at 1080p, the GPU load rises, but the frame rates remain high enough to indicate a balanced workload.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a larger role. The pixel count increases by 78% compared to 1080p, and the RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant. The frame rate drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is 28.1 FPS, a 32.5% reduction, which is larger than the drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra at 29.9 FPS, a 51.3% reduction. This indicates that the GPU is becoming the bottleneck as resolution increases, but the CPU still contributes meaningfully at lower settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The RTX 2070 SUPER's 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at this resolution for demanding presets. The CPU's role diminishes because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to keep up with the processor's capabilities. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same preset shows a consistent pattern: Low settings drop from 174.6 to 63.6 FPS, a 63.6% reduction, while Ultra settings drop from 86.4 to 28.4 FPS, a 67.1% reduction. This consistent large drop across presets confirms the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K. Players targeting 4K would need a more powerful GPU, while those at 1080p benefit from the strong CPU.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 86.4, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 71.3 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution fall to 58.3 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: Only with Low settings. The 3840x2160 Low preset averages 63.6 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line. Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K all fail to reach 60 FPS.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: Low settings average 174.6 FPS, while Ultra averages 86.4 FPS, a difference of 88.2 FPS or a 50.5% reduction.

Q: Which component limits performance at 4K?

A: The GPU is the primary constraint. The RTX 2070 SUPER cannot sustain high frame rates at 3840x2160 for Medium presets and above, with averages ranging from 28.4 to 50.3 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU matter more at lower resolutions?

A: Yes. At 1080p, the strong single-thread performance of the i5-14600KF supports frame rates above 100 FPS for most presets, indicating the CPU is more influential at lower resolutions where the GPU load is lighter.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is the optimal choice for a smooth experience.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best option. It averages 86.4 FPS, which is 26.4 FPS above the playable threshold. This gives players full visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding playable option. It averages 71.3 FPS, leaving 11.3 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS line. Choosing Ultra at this resolution would drop performance to 58.3 FPS, so High is the recommended ceiling.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable choice. It averages 63.6 FPS, which is just 3.6 FPS above the threshold. Any higher preset falls below 60 FPS, so players at 4K must accept reduced visual quality to maintain playability. The data shows a clear pattern: this combo handles 1080p at maximum quality, 1440p at High settings, and 4K at Low settings, with no preset above Low reaching the playable standard at the highest resolution.