Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 18 | 23 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 26 | 33 | 41 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 50 | 63 | 80 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B370 pairing delivers a very specific performance envelope in Fivem, one that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset selection. The recorded data shows a system that can comfortably handle 1080p gaming but falls well short of playable thresholds at higher resolutions. The measurements provide a clear picture of where this combination excels and where it struggles.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces its strongest results. The Low preset averages 80 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure across all tested configurations. Medium settings yield an average of 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. High settings drop the average to 50 FPS, while Ultra falls further to 39 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 17 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High is a 13 FPS loss, and High to Ultra costs another 11 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests diminishing returns as settings increase, with the most significant performance hit occurring between Low and Medium.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably across every preset. Low settings average 53 FPS, which is 27 FPS lower than the same preset at 1080p. Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings produce 33 FPS on average, and Ultra falls to 26 FPS. The resolution jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 34 percent of the average FPS at Low settings, and similar proportional losses appear at each preset level. None of these values approach the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 3840x2160, the results are severely constrained. Low settings average 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra drops to 14 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 15 FPS, indicating that the system is already heavily limited at this resolution regardless of graphical preset. The recorded minimum of 20 FPS at Medium settings shows that even the more forgiving presets produce frame rates well below what is needed for smooth gameplay. Every measurement at 4K falls under 30 FPS, making this resolution impractical for this hardware combination.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14600KF is not the limiting factor in this configuration. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile when compared against all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with a score of 49228 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G with 49196, show that the i5-14600KF is competitive with top-tier alternatives. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 trails by 0.8 percent, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads by the same margin. This level of processing power should not bottleneck a game like Fivem at standard resolutions.
The Intel Arc B370 tells a different story. This GPU sits in the 5th percentile among all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 1184 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192, all of which are within one point of the Arc B370's score. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4 percent. This places the Arc B370 in extremely low-end territory, and the measured FPS results reflect that positioning.
The resolution scaling confirms the GPU is the dominant constraint. Moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces average FPS by roughly 27 to 34 percent depending on preset, and moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it by another 40 to 50 percent. These are classic symptoms of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 32544 and a single-core result of 4594, suggest it has ample headroom. The PassMark single-thread score of 4273 and multi-thread score of 38697 further reinforce that processing power is not the bottleneck. The Arc B370's low pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, combined with its 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute capability, explain why higher resolutions cause such steep performance declines.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU side, the nearest rivals show that the i5-14600KF performs essentially identically to several strong alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is only 0.3 percent ahead, meaning users switching between these two processors would see nearly indistinguishable FPS results within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4 percent behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.4 percent ahead of the i5-14600KF. In practice, any of these CPUs paired with the Arc B370 would behave within one percent of each other in CPU-bound scenarios, though in Fivem specifically, the GPU remains the limiting factor.
For the GPU side, the Arc B370's closest competitor is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 0.2 percent higher. The ATI Radeon 5770 is 0.5 percent higher, the AMD Radeon 7650M is 0.7 percent higher, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4 percent lower. Users with any of these graphics solutions would experience nearly identical frame rates in Fivem at every resolution and preset. The differences are so small that swapping between these GPUs would produce FPS variations of less than one frame in most cases. The 3DMark Steel Nomad scores of 1184, 1186, 1190, 1192, and 1168 for these five cards all fall within a narrow band, meaning no meaningful performance separation exists among them.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080?
A: Yes, at Low and Medium settings. The Low preset averages 80 FPS and Medium averages 63 FPS, both above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High averages 50 FPS and Ultra averages 39 FPS, both below the threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for 1080p?
A: Medium is the best playable setting, with an average of 63 FPS, a minimum of 54 FPS, and a maximum of 72 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution.
Q: Is 1440p playable on this hardware?
A: No playable settings exist at 2560x1440. The highest average is 53 FPS at Low, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS.
Q: Is 4K playable on this combination?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings average only 29 FPS. Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. No preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Which component limits performance in Fivem?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF sits in the 90th percentile among CPUs. The sharp FPS drops when increasing resolution indicate GPU-bound performance.
Q: How does this combo rank among tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. This places it in the bottom portion of all tested configurations, consistent with the GPU's low percentile ranking relative to all other tested graphics cards.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the playable settings list includes Low and Medium, with Medium being the best option at 63 FPS average. At 2560x1440, the playable settings list is empty and no preset reaches 60 FPS, the highest being 53 at Low. At 3840x2160, no preset is playable, with Low averaging 29 FPS. Users targeting 1080p gaming with moderate graphical quality will find this combination workable, but anyone expecting 1440p or 4K performance will be disappointed. The data clearly shows a system that peaks at 80 FPS absolute maximum at 1080p Low and drops to 63 FPS at Medium 1080p as the best playable setting.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Medium with an average of 63 FPS. The minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 72 FPS brackets the average nicely. At 2560x1440, no best setting exists above 60 FPS, so this resolution has no recommended preset. At 3840x2160, no best setting exists, as even Low at 29 FPS falls far below the threshold. The 1080p Medium setting at 63 FPS stands out as the single playable configuration across the entire resolution and setting matrix.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. The ranking places it near the bottom 8 percent of all tested systems. Only 287 combos rank lower, while 3419 combos rank higher. This positioning is consistent with the GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all tested GPUs and stands in contrast to the CPU's strong 90th percentile ranking. The combo rank in game confirms what the measured data suggests, this system sits firmly in the low end of the performance spectrum for Fivem gameplay at higher resolutions.