Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

93%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
136 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
187 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
90 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
104 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 63 79 104
1440p QHD 90 115 148 187
1080p Full HD 136 176 222 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 176
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 222
1920x1080 Ultra 136
2560x1440 High 115
2560x1440 Low 187
2560x1440 Medium 148
2560x1440 Ultra 90
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Low 104
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The benchmark data for Fivem on the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination shows a system with substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate gameplay, though 4K Ultra settings remain out of reach. The measurements across three resolutions and four quality presets provide a clear picture of the scaling behavior and the performance ceiling for this pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset reaches an average of 279.8 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium produces 222.4 FPS, and the High preset still holds at 176.0 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a robust 136.1 FPS average, indicating that the CPU and GPU combination is far from saturated at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a drop of roughly 51%, but the absolute floor remains well above any competitive threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance profile remains strong but begins to show the GPU working harder. The Low preset averages 187.3 FPS, which is still a very high refresh-rate experience. Medium follows at 147.6 FPS, and High drops to 114.7 FPS. The Ultra preset still clears 90 FPS with an average of 89.9 FPS. The relative ordering is consistent with the 1080p results, but the gap between presets narrows slightly, suggesting that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. The Low preset manages 104.3 FPS, which is still playable for most users. Medium drops to 78.5 FPS, and High falls to 63.4 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, drops below the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging only 47.8 FPS. This is the only resolution and preset combination in the dataset that fails to meet the playable standard. The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a significant per-preset penalty, particularly at the higher quality levels.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best possible configuration that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 136.1 FPS. This is the most demanding setting available in the dataset, and the system still provides more than double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains the optimal choice, with an average of 89.9 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for occasional dips without compromising the experience.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The High preset is the most demanding setting that maintains playability, averaging 63.4 FPS. This is only 3.4 FPS above the threshold, so users who prefer 4K should be aware that the margin is slim. The Medium preset offers a safer buffer at 78.5 FPS, but the data clearly identifies High as the highest-quality playable option at this resolution. The Ultra preset at 47.8 FPS is not playable by the 60 FPS standard.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor for the highest frame rates. The difference between the Low preset at 279.8 FPS and the Ultra preset at 136.1 FPS is about 105%, which suggests that the GPU is being fed sufficiently even at lower quality settings where the render load is reduced. The Intel Core i5-14400F, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, demonstrates strong headroom for high-FPS scenarios, as shown by the 1080p Low result being the peak of all measurements.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The Low preset drops from 279.8 to 187.3 FPS (a 33% reduction) when moving from 1080p to 1440p, while the Ultra preset drops from 136.1 to 89.9 FPS (a 34% reduction). This proportional scaling indicates that both components are still contributing, but the GPU's workload is increasing in line with pixel count.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Low preset at 104.3 FPS is a 44% drop from the 1440p Low result, and the Ultra preset at 47.8 FPS is a 47% drop from its 1440p counterpart. The RTX 5070, with its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, handles the higher resolution but cannot sustain Ultra settings at 4K while maintaining 60 FPS. The CPU's role diminishes as the resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for the Intel Core i5-14400F shows several CPUs with nearly identical average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has an average score of 32233, which is 0.1% lower than the i5-14400F's 32279. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% higher at 32226, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% lower at 32354. The Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.5% lower at 32121. In practical terms, these processors would behave almost identically in Fivem, with differences well within run-to-run variance. The i5-14400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong position for this title.

For the GPU, the nearestRivals are less aligned in terms of architecture but similar in aggregate score. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 has an average score of 40318, just 0.1% below the RTX 5070's 40377. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% lower at 40063, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% higher at 40870. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2.0% lower at 39568. These are professional or mobile parts that would not typically be paired with a desktop CPU, but the score data suggests they would produce similar frame rates in Fivem if they could sustain the same power and thermal envelope. The RTX 5070 ranks in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, which is slightly lower than the CPU's percentile ranking.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Fivem at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes, the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 63.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The margin is narrow, but it is playable.

Q: What is the maximum FPS achievable with this setup?

A: The highest measured average is 279.8 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. At Ultra settings, the highest average is 136.1 FPS at 1920x1080.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution?

A: Yes, Ultra is playable at 1920x1080 (136.1 FPS) and 2560x1440 (89.9 FPS). At 3840x2160, Ultra drops to 47.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, Intel Core i9-11900, AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, and Intel Core i7-12800H. The performance differences are negligible for Fivem.

Q: What is the recommended preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 89.9 FPS, making it the best choice for users with a 1440p display who want maximum visual quality.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS standard at every resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 47.8, which fails the playable threshold. All other resolution and preset combinations in the dataset pass.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 737 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 20% of all configurations tested for this game. The ranking reflects the strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, where the system consistently delivers high frame rates across all presets, combined with a playable result at 4K High. The 4K Ultra failure is a notable weakness, but it is a single data point in an otherwise strong profile. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking and 82nd percentile GPU ranking are consistent with the overall combo position, indicating that neither component is a bottleneck relative to the other.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem successfully across the majority of tested configurations. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset delivering 136.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets including Ultra (89.9 FPS) are playable. At 3840x2160, the High preset (63.4 FPS) is the highest playable option, while Low (104.3 FPS) and Medium (78.5 FPS) also pass. The Ultra preset at 4K fails to reach 60 FPS, averaging 47.8 FPS. The system is therefore fully capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming at maximum settings, and it can handle 4K at high quality with a slim but real margin above the playable standard.