Fivem

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a formidable combination for Fivem, delivering high frame rates across most settings and resolutions. This pairing ranks in the 1081st position out of 3707 tested combos, placing it comfortably in the upper third of all configurations. The data confirms that this system is not only capable of running the game smoothly but also provides enough headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at standard resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and graphical fidelity increase.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1081 out of 3707 tested combinations places it in the 29th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of configurations. This is a strong result for a mid-range CPU paired with a previous-generation high-end GPU. The CPU itself sits in the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card within this pairing.

In practical terms, this rank suggests the system is well-balanced for Fivem, a title that can be demanding in multiplayer scenarios. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 32,279, while the GPU averages 23,172. These scores, when combined with the measured FPS data, show a system that can handle the game’s most demanding settings at 1440p and 1080p, while 4K requires some compromises. The gap between the CPU’s high percentile ranking and the GPU’s slightly lower one hints that at lower resolutions, the GPU may become the limiting factor, but at higher resolutions, the load shifts more evenly.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling of frame rates across resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial: the average FPS drops from 249.3 to 119.5, a reduction of roughly 52%. This large gap indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is heavily utilized, and increasing graphical settings directly impacts performance. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score of 3,055 in Cinebench R23, is capable of feeding the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the very high frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more moderate. The average FPS ranges from 165.5 on Low to 77.4 on Ultra, a 53% drop. The pattern is similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower, showing that the GPU is now working harder to render more pixels. The CPU’s role becomes slightly less critical here, as the GPU’s rendering workload dominates. At 3840x2160, the scaling steepens dramatically: Low yields 92.6 FPS, Medium 70.9 FPS, High 57.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44.9 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 51.5%, but the absolute performance is much lower, clearly showing the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K.

The data indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, the system is well-balanced, with the GPU handling the increased load from higher presets. At 4K, however, the RTX 3080’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are stretched thin, and the CPU’s strong performance cannot compensate for the GPU’s rendering limitations. This is typical of a high-resolution scenario where pixel throughput becomes the deciding factor.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would deliver comparable results. The Intel Core i5-14400F’s closest competitor in benchmarks is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32,233 versus the i5’s 32,279, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900 is also nearly identical, scoring 32,226, just 0.2% behind. On the AMD side, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32,354, which is 0.2% higher, while the Core i7-12800H trails by 0.5% with a score of 32,121. These rivals would behave nearly identically in Fivem, meaning frame rates would be within a rounding error of what the i5-14400F produces.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are more diverse but similarly close in aggregate score. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 3080’s 23,172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23,250, also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon R9 M290X both score 23,273 and 23,276, respectively, each 0.4% higher. These small deltas suggest that in real-world gaming, these GPUs would produce nearly identical average FPS in Fivem, though the RTX 3080’s ray tracing and DLSS capabilities are not relevant here since the game does not utilize them in the measured data.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 70.9 FPS. High settings drop to 57.2 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 77.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the highest quality setting available at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F scores 32,279, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32,233, 0.1% lower) and the Intel Core i9-11900 (32,226, 0.2% lower). The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% faster, and the Core i7-12800H is 0.5% slower.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p on High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the measured average FPS is 158. This provides a very smooth experience suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more of a bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rates drop significantly with higher presets (from 92.6 on Low to 44.9 on Ultra), while the CPU’s strong single-core performance is not enough to maintain high FPS due to the GPU’s rendering workload.

Q: What is the overall rank of this combo among tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 1081st out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 29% of all systems tested for Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. Low settings produce an average of 249.3 FPS, which is extremely high and suitable for 240Hz monitors. Medium settings yield 197.1 FPS, High settings drop to 158 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage 119.5 FPS. All of these are well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making 1080p a resolution where the user can maximize visual quality without concern.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down predictably. Low settings average 165.5 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings produce 130.7 FPS, High settings drop to 103.2 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 77.4 FPS. This resolution offers a balanced experience, with Ultra settings still playable and lower presets providing high refresh rates. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 33-35% across all presets, reflecting the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes more constrained. Low settings average 92.6 FPS, which is playable, and Medium settings yield 70.9 FPS. However, High settings drop to 57.2 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra settings further decline to 44.9 FPS. This resolution clearly stresses the GPU, and users will need to compromise on settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The average FPS at 4K Low is still higher than the playable threshold, but the steep drop at High and Ultra suggests that 4K is best reserved for less demanding titles or lower quality presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 119.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The system has ample headroom at this resolution, as even the most demanding settings leave significant performance margin.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 77.4 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing users to enjoy the highest graphical fidelity at this resolution. While the frame rate is lower than at 1080p, it remains fluid and suitable for most gaming scenarios.

At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Medium, which produces an average of 70.9 FPS. High settings drop to 57.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, so Medium is the optimal choice for 4K gaming. This setting strikes a balance between visual quality and performance, ensuring a smooth experience without the frame rate dips seen at higher presets. Low settings at 4K produce 92.6 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual experience while still maintaining playable frame rates.