Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
73 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
11ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 33 43 53
1440p QHD 46 62 76 93
1080p Full HD 73 91 118 148

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Low 148
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 Ultra 73
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Low 93
2560x1440 Medium 76
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14400F sits in a tightly packed performance cluster based on the database's aggregate benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score of 32279 places it within a fraction of a percent of several competing processors. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233, a delta of just 0.1%. The Intel Core i9-11900 trails by a similar margin at 32226, also 0.2% behind. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, which is 0.2% ahead of the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i7-12800H rounds out this group with a score of 32121, sitting 0.5% behind. In practical terms, all four of these processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The i5-14400F's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, give it a strong single-thread foundation, and the database places it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 posts an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close in aggregate performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics score 15270, just 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, trailing by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, which is 0.8% behind. Despite the RTX 2060 being from the Turing generation with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, these rivals span different architectures and market segments. The data indicates that in Fivem, a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similarly matched CPU would produce near-identical frame rates. The RTX 2060's 1920 shading units and 30 RT cores provide the raw throughput, but the benchmark deltas suggest that the game is not heavily dependent on the specific strengths of any one of these cards.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded FPS data for Fivem reveals a clear pattern: the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU holds frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the game runs at 147.7 FPS on Low settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU, with its strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055), is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to sustain high output. At 3840x2160, the same Low preset drops to 52.6 FPS, a reduction of 95.1 FPS. This massive drop is attributable to the GPU's pixel throughput limits; the RTX 2060 has a pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s, which become saturated at 4K resolution.

The scaling between presets further clarifies the division of labor. At 2560x1440, moving from Low to Medium reduces the average FPS from 93.2 to 76, a loss of 17.2 FPS. Moving from Medium to High drops it to 62, another 14 FPS loss. The jump from High to Ultra is severe: 46.1 FPS, a 15.9 FPS decline. This pattern repeats at 1920x1080, where Low runs at 147.7 FPS, Medium at 117.7, High at 91.2, and Ultra at 73.2. The consistent step-downs across presets suggest that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for visual quality settings, as each increase in graphical load directly reduces frame output. The CPU's role is more evident at lower resolutions and lower presets, where frame rates exceed 100 FPS; here, the i5-14400F's throughput (PassMark multi-thread score of 25470) ensures that the GPU is not starved of draw calls.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance is absolute. Even on Low settings, the frame rate only reaches 52.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The RTX 2060's 6 GB memory capacity and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K workloads in this game. The data shows that at 4K, the CPU has little influence on the outcome; the GPU is the sole determinant of performance. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU's headroom is visible: the difference between Low and Ultra is 74.5 FPS, and even Ultra stays above 60 FPS. This indicates that the CPU can maintain high frame rates while the GPU handles the increased graphical load. For users with this combo, the takeaway is that the RTX 2060 caps performance at higher resolutions, while the i5-14400F provides ample margin at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RTX 2060 and i5-14400F combination falls short of the 60 FPS target across all four presets. The Low preset yields an average of 52.6 FPS, which is the highest recorded at this resolution. Medium drops to 43.3 FPS, High to 32.5 FPS, and Ultra to 28.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 24.1 FPS, indicating that the GPU's compute resources (6.451 TFLOPS FP32) are heavily taxed by 4K rendering. No min or max FPS values were recorded, but the averages alone show that this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves significantly. The Low preset runs at 93.2 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium maintains 76 FPS, and High holds at 62 FPS, just barely clearing the playable mark. Ultra, however, falls to 46.1 FPS, which is below the threshold. The transition from High to Ultra represents a 15.9 FPS drop, the largest step between consecutive presets at this resolution. This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces graphical features that the GPU cannot handle at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, all four presets exceed 60 FPS. Low runs at 147.7 FPS, Medium at 117.7 FPS, High at 91.2 FPS, and Ultra at 73.2 FPS. The margin above the threshold is substantial even at Ultra, with 13.2 FPS of headroom. The scaling is consistent: each preset step costs roughly 20 to 30 FPS, with the largest drop occurring between Medium and High (26.5 FPS). The i5-14400F's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2058) ensures that even at 147.7 FPS, the CPU is not the limiting factor.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the playable range depends heavily on resolution. According to the verdict data, the 3840x2160 resolution has no playable settings; the highest average FPS is 52.6 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Users with 4K displays will need to lower resolution or upgrade the GPU, as no preset achieves smooth performance.

At 2560x1440, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on three presets: Low (93.2 FPS), Medium (76 FPS), and High (62 FPS). The best playable setting is High, which achieves 62 FPS on average. This leaves a slim margin of 2 FPS above the threshold, so users seeking more stability might prefer Medium at 76 FPS. Ultra is not playable at this resolution, as it drops to 46.1 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable. All four presets exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra achieving 73.2 FPS, High at 91.2, Medium at 117.7, and Low at 147.7. The best playable setting is Ultra, which provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a 13.2 FPS buffer above the threshold. This is the recommended resolution for this hardware combo, as it offers the most headroom and the full range of graphical options.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's measured combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2856 out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the lower 23rd percentile of all systems tested, meaning that roughly 77% of recorded combinations perform better in this specific game. The rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions; the RTX 2060's mid-range standing (58th percentile among all GPUs) drags down the overall combo performance, despite the CPU's stronger position (83rd percentile among all CPUs). The data suggests that users with this combo are likely to experience average frame rates relative to the broader test pool, with the GPU being the primary constraint in Fivem.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 52.6 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. No preset at this resolution achieves playable performance.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 achieves 62 FPS on average, which is the most demanding playable setting. Medium runs at 76 FPS and Low at 93.2 FPS, but High offers the best balance of quality and performance.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its closest GPU rivals in this game?

A: The RTX 2060's average benchmark score of 15290 is nearly identical to the GTX 580 (15283, 0% delta), the Radeon 680M (15270, 0.1% behind), and the RTX 3050 OEM (15199, 0.6% behind). The RX 7600 trails by 0.8% with a score of 15171.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary factor for visual settings, as frame rates drop from 147.7 FPS on Low to 73.2 FPS on Ultra. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055) ensures it does not bottleneck even at high frame rates.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 147.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How many tested combos does this system outperform in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 2856 out of 3707 tested combinations, meaning it outperforms approximately 851 other systems in the database for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. The highest average FPS is 52.6 on Low, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Users at this resolution should consider reducing to 2560x1440 or upgrading the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, which achieves an average of 62 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium (76 FPS) and Low (93.2 FPS) also qualify, but High offers the highest visual quality within the playable range.

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, with an average of 73.2 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 13.2 FPS, providing a comfortable margin. All other presets (High at 91.2 FPS, Medium at 117.7 FPS, Low at 147.7 FPS) also exceed the threshold, so users can select Ultra for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.