Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 68 | 90 | 112 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 128 | 161 | 203 |
| 1080p Full HD | 152 | 189 | 244 | 304 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers a strong performance profile for Fivem, with measured data showing that the combination can handle the game at high frame rates across most settings and resolutions. Benchmark results indicate that this combo ranks in the top tier of tested configurations, specifically at position 452 out of 3707 total combinations, placing it in the 88th percentile of all tested systems. The data reveals a system capable of exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold in nearly all scenarios, with the only exception being the Ultra preset at 4K resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates that far exceed typical display refresh rates. The Low preset achieves an average of 303.6 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all resolutions and settings for this configuration. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 243.6 FPS, while the High preset delivers 189.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p still maintains a robust 151.5 FPS average, demonstrating that even the most demanding settings remain highly playable at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the performance scaling shows expected reductions but remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset generates a 203.3 FPS average, followed by Medium at 160.8 FPS and High at 128.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p produces a 98.9 FPS average, which is still comfortably above playable thresholds and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
The 3840x2160 resolution reveals the most significant performance drop. The Low preset maintains a solid 111.9 FPS average, while Medium delivers 89.5 FPS and High achieves 67.9 FPS. However, the Ultra preset falls to 51.6 FPS, which dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This marks the only configuration where the system cannot sustain smooth gameplay at maximum settings.
The data shows a clear pattern where each step up in settings reduces performance by roughly 20-30% at every resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra is most pronounced at 4K, where the difference is approximately 60 FPS, whereas at 1080p the same settings gap represents a larger absolute difference of about 152 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises, while the CPU maintains adequate headroom even at lower settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 152.1 FPS, representing a 50.1% reduction. This substantial drop suggests that the RTX 4070 Ti is the primary bottleneck at this resolution, as the i5-13400F provides sufficient processing power to keep up with even the lowest graphics settings.
When moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings, the frame rate reductions range from 33% at Low (303.6 to 203.3 FPS) to 34.7% at Ultra (151.5 to 98.9 FPS). This consistent scaling pattern indicates that the GPU workload scales predictably with pixel count, while the CPU's role remains relatively constant. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, appear more than adequate for Fivem's multiplayer demands, as evidenced by the high frame rates even at 1080p Low where CPU overhead would be most apparent.
At 4K, the GPU's limitations become more visible. The reduction from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a 47.8% decrease (98.9 to 51.6 FPS), which is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p drop. This nonlinear scaling suggests that the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit memory bus become stressed at higher resolutions, particularly with demanding presets. The GPU's 7680 shading units and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are substantial, but 4K Ultra pushes the memory subsystem to its limits.
The data implies that for Fivem, the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. Even at 1080p Low, where the CPU would be most heavily utilized, the system achieves 303.6 FPS, indicating the i5-13400F's single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 960) is more than sufficient. The GPU's role dominates across all resolutions, with the performance gap between settings widening as resolution increases, confirming that graphics processing is the primary constraint for this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 452 out of 3707 tested combinations places it in the top 12.2% of all systems tested for Fivem. This percentile position indicates that the i5-13400F and RTX 4070 Ti combination outperforms the vast majority of configurations, though it does not reach the absolute top tier. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 77, while the GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 84, suggesting that the graphics card contributes more to the overall ranking than the processor.
The average benchmark score for the CPU is 25292, which positions it near several notable alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, showing a delta of 0%, making it effectively identical in CPU performance. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, representing a -0.3% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 with the same -0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, showing a 0.4% difference. These minimal deltas indicate that CPU performance is not a distinguishing factor among these options.
For the GPU, the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score is 44795. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, showing a -0.8% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 with a -1.3% delta. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, representing a 1.6% difference, and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592 with a -1.7% delta. These close scores suggest that GPU performance among these alternatives is similarly clustered, with no clear standout.
The combination's rank suggests that while the individual components are strong, other system configurations with different CPU-GPU pairings may achieve higher rankings in Fivem. The data implies that the balance between CPU and GPU is well-matched for this title, but there is room for improvement at the very top of the performance spectrum.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 51.6 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The playable settings at 4K are High (67.9 FPS), Medium (89.5 FPS), and Low (111.9 FPS).
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 98.9 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that remains above 60 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for maximum visual quality at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (0.4% delta). All rivals fall within 0.4% of the i5-13400F's performance.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 189.4 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.
Q: Is there a significant performance gap between Medium and High settings at 4K?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160, Medium settings produce an average of 89.5 FPS, while High settings drop to 67.9 FPS. This represents a 24.1% reduction in frame rate, though both remain playable.
Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 5090 Mobile?
A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, while the RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, showing a -0.8% delta. This indicates the RTX 5090 Mobile is only marginally faster in synthetic benchmarks.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals data, several CPU and GPU alternatives would produce similar performance in Fivem. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is the closest match with a 0% delta from the i5-13400F's average score of 25292. This means systems using the Ryzen 9 6900HS would behave nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are also very close, with -0.3% deltas, making them essentially interchangeable for this game.
The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H shows a 0.4% delta, which is slightly higher but still within a negligible margin. For practical purposes, all four rival CPUs would deliver indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem, as the game does not appear to be CPU-limited at the tested settings.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the closest rival with a -0.8% delta from the RTX 4070 Ti's average score of 44795. This indicates nearly identical performance, though the mobile nature of the RTX 5090 Mobile may introduce other system-level differences. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT shows a -1.3% delta, while the Intel Arc A730M is at -1.7%, both slightly behind the RTX 4070 Ti but within a tight band.
The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is the only rival that performs worse, with a 1.6% delta, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti holds a small but measurable advantage. In real-world Fivem gameplay, these GPU alternatives would produce frame rates within a few percent of each other, making them viable substitutes depending on system configuration and availability.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, which achieves an average of 67.9 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the playability threshold while delivering better visual quality than Medium or Low. The Ultra preset at 51.6 FPS is not recommended due to sub-60 FPS performance.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 98.9 FPS, making it the best choice for maximum quality. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the data shows that even this demanding setting leaves substantial headroom for consistent gameplay.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an impressive 151.5 FPS average. This is the recommended setting for 1080p, as it provides the best visual experience while still maintaining frame rates that exceed most high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 189.4 FPS could be chosen for even higher frame rates, but Ultra offers the best balance of quality and performance.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination can definitively run Fivem, with benchmark results showing playable performance across the vast majority of tested configurations. The verdict by resolution confirms that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are fully playable at all settings, including Ultra, with average frame rates of 151.5 FPS and 98.9 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, the system remains playable at High, Medium, and Low settings, with the High preset achieving 67.9 FPS.
The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra, which produces 51.6 FPS. This means users with 4K displays should select High settings or lower to maintain smooth gameplay. For 1440p and 1080p displays, the system offers excellent performance headroom, allowing for maximum settings without concern. The data indicates this is a capable gaming system for Fivem, with the GPU being the primary factor in determining achievable frame rates, while the CPU provides ample processing power for the multiplayer environment.