Fivem

The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a consistently high-performance experience in Fivem, with benchmark data showing strong frame rates across all tested resolutions. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, ranks in the 77th percentile among all tested CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 68th percentile. This pairing produces measured results that place the combo in the 1048th position out of 3707 tested combinations, indicating a solidly above-average configuration for this multiplayer title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25292 places it in close competition with several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS matches almost exactly with a score of 25284, representing a 0% difference. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D both score slightly higher at 25362 and 25365 respectively, showing a -0.3% delta from the i5-13400F. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H trails marginally with a score of 25201, a 0.4% difference. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical performance in Fivem, with differences well within measurement noise.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 achieves an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 with a score of 23249 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (-0.4% delta). These deltas are all under half a percent, meaning users with any of these GPUs would experience virtually indistinguishable performance in Fivem. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for the game's textures and draw distances.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 250 FPS on Low settings, 197 FPS on Medium, 157 FPS on High, and 122 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 128 FPS drop, representing a 51.2% reduction in frame rate as graphical demands increase. This substantial scaling indicates the GPU becomes increasingly important as settings rise, though the CPU's 10-core configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures it never becomes a bottleneck at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates decrease across all settings: 164 FPS on Low, 130 FPS on Medium, 104 FPS on High, and 80 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 84 FPS, a 51.2% reduction that mirrors the 1080p scaling. The GPU's role becomes more pronounced here, as the increased pixel count demands more from the RTX 3080's 8704 shading units and 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

At 3840x2160, the GPU clearly dominates the performance equation. The system manages 91 FPS on Low, 72 FPS on Medium, 58 FPS on High, and 45 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 46 FPS, a 50.5% reduction. The RTX 3080's 320-bit memory bus and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are taxed heavily at this resolution, while the CPU's workload remains relatively constant. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is the primary determinant of playability, with only Low and Medium settings clearing the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 achieves a rank of 1048 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem. This places the pairing in the top 28.3% of all configurations tested, a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a previous-generation high-end GPU. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs contributes meaningfully to this result, as Fivem's multiplayer nature can be demanding on processor resources.

The GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs is slightly lower but still respectable. The RTX 3080's architecture, built on the 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors, provides robust performance that pairs well with the CPU's capabilities. The measured FPS data confirms that this combo delivers playable frame rates at every resolution tested, with only the most demanding 4K Ultra settings falling below the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly demonstrates that this PC can run Fivem effectively across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets achieve playable frame rates: Low runs at 250 FPS, Medium at 197 FPS, High at 157 FPS, and Ultra at 122 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution similarly sees all settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra maintaining 80 FPS and Low reaching 164 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system remains playable but with limitations. Low settings deliver 91 FPS and Medium achieves 72 FPS, both comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings drop to 58 FPS, just below the threshold, while Ultra falls to 45 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms that Low and Medium are the playable settings at 4K, with Medium being the best playable option at 72 FPS average.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only on Low and Medium settings. At 3840x2160, Low settings average 91 FPS and Medium averages 72 FPS, both above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High and Ultra settings fall below 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of 80 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F scores 25292 on average, nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS at 25284 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 25201 (0.4% delta). It trails the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D by just 0.3%.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 significantly better than its closest competitors?

A: No. The RTX 3080's average score of 23172 is within 0.4% of all four nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system averages 157 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playability threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 45 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, achieving an average of 122 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still offering more than double the playability threshold.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings remain the best choice, delivering an average of 80 FPS. This resolution and preset combination offers a strong balance between visual fidelity and performance.

At 3840x2160, Medium settings are the most demanding playable option, averaging 72 FPS. This keeps the experience above 60 FPS while providing better visual quality than the Low preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 250 FPS on Low settings, 197 FPS on Medium with minimum and maximum values of 167 and 226 FPS respectively, 157 FPS on High, and 122 FPS on Ultra.

At 2560x1440, performance scales to 164 FPS on Low, 130 FPS on Medium with a range of 110 to 149 FPS, 104 FPS on High, and 80 FPS on Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the system produces 91 FPS on Low, 72 FPS on Medium with minimum and maximum values of 61 and 83 FPS, 58 FPS on High, and 45 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K shows the narrowest FPS range among all tested configurations, indicating consistent frame pacing despite the heavy GPU load.