Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

60%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
199 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
93 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
62 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
8.2ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 45 57 69
1440p QHD 62 81 103 128
1080p Full HD 93 122 155 199

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 122
1920x1080 Low 199
1920x1080 Medium 155
1920x1080 Ultra 93
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 Ultra 62
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a classic mid-range desktop combination, and the measured FPS data for Fivem reveals a clear picture of its capabilities across common gaming resolutions. The benchmark results, which are measured rather than estimated, show that this combo is highly capable at 1080p and 1440p, but begins to strain at 4K, particularly with higher graphical presets. The data indicates a strong performance profile, with the system comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold in most scenarios tested.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across three resolutions and four quality settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 198.9, which is a very high figure that indicates the CPU and GPU are not heavily taxed. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 154.6 FPS, while High settings yield 122.4 FPS. Even at the Ultra preset, the system maintains an average of 93.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows more scaling. The Low preset produces an average of 128.4 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings drop the average to 103 FPS, and High settings bring it down to 81.3 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still manages an average of 62.4 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. This suggests that at 1440p, the Ultra preset is the ceiling for maintaining a consistent 60+ FPS experience.

The 3840x2160 resolution tells a different story. At 4K, the system’s performance falls off significantly. The Low preset yields an average of 68.7 FPS, making it the only playable option at this resolution. Medium settings drop to 56.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. High settings produce an average of 44.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset brings the average down to 36.9 FPS. These numbers reveal that the RTX 3060 Ti is the limiting factor at 4K, as the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates with demanding settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets in the data highlights the shifting roles of the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 105.6 FPS (198.9 to 93.3), which is a substantial drop. This indicates that while the CPU is capable of pushing very high frame rates at low settings, the GPU is increasingly burdened as the preset quality increases. The fact that the system can reach nearly 200 FPS at Low settings suggests that the Intel Core i5-13400F is not a bottleneck at this resolution, as it can feed the GPU with enough data to achieve such high output.

At 2560x1440, the performance gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 66 FPS (128.4 to 62.4). This narrowing suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, as the increased pixel count puts more strain on the rendering pipeline. The CPU’s role diminishes slightly, but the data still shows a healthy frame rate at Low settings, implying the processor is still keeping up.

At 3840x2160, the trend becomes more pronounced. The difference between Low and Ultra is 31.8 FPS (68.7 to 36.9). The Low preset is the only one that clears 60 FPS, and the drop to Medium is 11.8 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K. The RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely being saturated, while the CPU has plenty of headroom. The data implies that for this game, the GPU dictates high-resolution performance, while the CPU is more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would deliver similar results. For the Intel Core i5-13400F, its average benchmark score is 25292, and its percentile rank among all CPUs is 77. The closest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with an average score of 25284 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D with 25365 (-0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 5 120 with 25362 (-0.3% delta). This means a system with an AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS or a Ryzen 5 5600X3D would likely produce very similar frame rates in Fivem, as their overall processing power is nearly identical to the i5-13400F.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, with a percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with a score of 16014 (0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with 16351 (-1.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with 16361 (-1.4% delta). A system with an RX 5700 XT or RX 9060 would be expected to perform within a couple of percentage points of the RTX 3060 Ti. Therefore, users with these alternative graphics cards can expect similar FPS numbers in Fivem, provided the CPU is also in the same performance class.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-13400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ranks at 1858 out of 3707 combos for Fivem. This places it in the middle of the pack, which is a reasonable position for a mid-range setup. The rank suggests that while many higher-end systems will outperform it, there is also a large number of combinations that fall below it. The percentile rank of the CPU (77) and GPU (59) individually suggests that the CPU is a stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU, but the combined score of the system reflects a balanced pairing that is neither a top-tier nor a low-end performer.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem, but the playable experience depends heavily on the resolution and settings. According to the verdict data, at 1920x1080, all presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 93.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, including Ultra at 62.4 FPS, which is a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, with an average of 68.7 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets at 4K all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 56.9, 44.7, and 36.9 respectively. The data clearly shows that for a smooth 60+ FPS experience, users should stick to 1080p or 1440p with any settings, or drop to Low settings at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS is 198.9, measured at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at Ultra settings in 4K?

A: No, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 36.9, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for performance at 1440p?

A: The data shows a narrowing FPS gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p (128.4 to 62.4) compared to 1080p, indicating the GPU becomes a more significant factor as resolution increases, though the CPU still provides high frame rates at lower presets.

Q: Which settings are playable at 2560x1440?

A: All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at 1440p, with the Ultra preset averaging 62.4 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, while the RX 5700 XT scores 16361, which is a -1.4% delta, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: The best playable setting at 4K is Low, which achieves an average of 68.7 FPS, the only preset to clear the 60 FPS mark at that resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS and the playable threshold of 60 FPS, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution is as follows.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which yields an average of 93.3 FPS. This provides a high-quality visual experience with a substantial performance buffer.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 62.4 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, but it is close to the threshold, so users who prefer a larger safety margin might consider the High preset, which averages 81.3 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, with an average of 68.7 FPS. This is the only configuration that achieves a playable frame rate at this resolution, and it does so with a modest lead over the 60 FPS line. The data shows that to maintain a smooth experience at 4K, visual fidelity must be significantly reduced.