Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 holds rank 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the combination in the lower 8th percentile of all recorded system configurations, meaning roughly 92% of tested combos deliver higher average frame rates in this game. The ranking reflects a substantial bottleneck, and the data indicates that the graphics solution is the primary constraint.

The CPU itself is a strong performer in general benchmarks. Its average benchmark score of 25292 places it at the 77th percentile against all CPUs, which is a respectable position. However, the GPU's average benchmark score of 1184 sits at just the 5th percentile against all GPUs. The disparity between these two components is stark: the processor is well above average while the graphics adapter is near the bottom of the database. In Fivem, the combo rank of 3420 aligns much more closely with the GPU's low percentile than with the CPU's solid standing, confirming that the Arc B370 drags the overall experience down.

When compared to other tested combinations, this pairing is not competitive for high-refresh or high-resolution play. The recorded frame rates across all resolutions and presets show that the system rarely approaches the 60 FPS threshold, and only does so at 1080p with lower settings. The rank of 3420 out of 3707 is a clear indicator that this is a low-tier configuration for Fivem, suitable only for modest expectations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for this combo reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Intel Arc B370. The CPU, with 10 cores and 16 threads, has ample processing headroom for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, which can be demanding on the processor due to multiple players, vehicles, and scripted events. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and single-core score of 3191 indicate strong capacity for both threaded and lightly threaded tasks.

The GPU, however, is the limiting factor at every resolution. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 18 FPS on High, 23 FPS on Medium, and 29 FPS on Low. These numbers are all far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the averages improve to 33 FPS on High, 41 FPS on Medium, and 53 FPS on Low, but still miss the threshold. At 1920x1080, the averages reach 50 FPS on High, 63 FPS on Medium, and 80 FPS on Low. The scaling from 4K down to 1080p shows that the GPU is the dominant factor: as resolution drops, frame rates rise significantly.

Resolution scaling is the key evidence. Moving from 3840x2160 to 2560x1440 at Medium settings improves the average from 23 FPS to 41 FPS, a gain of 18 FPS. Moving from 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 at Medium settings improves the average from 41 FPS to 63 FPS, another gain of 22 FPS. This consistent improvement as resolution decreases indicates that the GPU's fill rate and shading capacity are the bottlenecks, not the CPU. The CPU has enough power to feed the GPU at all tested resolutions, but the Arc B370 cannot render frames fast enough at higher pixel counts.

The preset scaling within each resolution further supports this. At 1920x1080, dropping from Ultra to Low changes the average from 39 FPS to 80 FPS, a 41 FPS swing. At 2560x1440, the swing from Ultra to Low is 27 FPS (26 to 53). At 3840x2160, the swing is 15 FPS (14 to 29). The larger swings at lower resolutions indicate that the GPU has more headroom to respond to settings changes when pixel count is lower, again pointing to the GPU as the limiting component. The CPU's role is consistent and adequate across all scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

The playable threshold for this database is 60 FPS. At each resolution, the goal is to find the most demanding preset that stays at or above that threshold.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average recorded is 29 FPS on Low settings. Medium settings yield 23 FPS, High yields 18 FPS, and Ultra yields 14 FPS. There is no playable configuration at this resolution, and the verdict field confirms this with an empty list of playable settings.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar. The highest average is 53 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold by 7 FPS. Medium settings produce 41 FPS, High produces 33 FPS, and Ultra produces 26 FPS. Again, no preset is playable, and the verdict field lists no playable settings.

At 1920x1080, the system finally crosses the threshold. Low settings deliver an average of 80 FPS, which is comfortably above 60. Medium settings deliver an average of 63 FPS, also above the threshold, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. High settings drop to 50 FPS, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1080p is Medium, with an average of 63 FPS. This is the best playable configuration for this combo.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU, there are several hardware combinations that would behave similarly in Fivem.

For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the nearest rivals by average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, the Intel Core 5 120, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H. The Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, a delta of 0% versus the i5-13400F's 25292. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, which is 0.3% higher. The Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365, also 0.3% higher. The Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, which is 0.4% lower. All of these CPUs are within a fraction of a percent of the i5-13400F in aggregate benchmark performance, meaning any of them would deliver essentially the same CPU-side behavior in Fivem. The choice among them would not materially change frame rates given the GPU bottleneck.

For the Intel Arc B370, the nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, the ATI Radeon HD 5770, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and the AMD FirePro M2000. The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370's 1184. The Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. These GPUs are all within a couple of percent of the Arc B370's benchmark score, so a system built with any of them would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem. The performance class here is very low, and the measured frame rates in this database reflect that.

In practical terms, swapping the i5-13400F for any of its nearest CPU rivals would not improve Fivem performance, because the GPU is the limiting factor. Swapping the Arc B370 for any of its nearest GPU rivals would also not improve performance, as they are all in the same performance tier. The combo rank of 3420 would remain roughly the same with any of these substitutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combo covers three resolutions and four settings presets per resolution. All frame rates are averages unless otherwise noted.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows. On Ultra settings, the average is 14 FPS. On High settings, the average is 18 FPS. On Medium settings, the average is 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. On Low settings, the average is 29 FPS. No minimum or maximum values are recorded for Ultra, High, or Low at this resolution. Every preset at 4K falls far below the 60 FPS threshold, with the best case (Low) achieving less than half of the target.

At 2560x1440, the results improve but remain below the threshold. On Ultra settings, the average is 26 FPS. On High settings, the average is 33 FPS. On Medium settings, the average is 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. On Low settings, the average is 53 FPS. The gap between Low and the 60 FPS target is 7 FPS, and no preset at this resolution is playable. The Medium preset shows a measurable range from 35 to 48 FPS, indicating some variability in gameplay, but the average remains well short of playable.

At 1920x1080, the results are the only ones that reach playable levels. On Ultra settings, the average is 39 FPS. On High settings, the average is 50 FPS. On Medium settings, the average is 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. On Low settings, the average is 80 FPS. The Medium preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 63 FPS, and the Low preset clears it comfortably with 80 FPS. The minimum of 54 FPS on Medium suggests occasional dips below the threshold, but the average sustains playability. Low settings have no recorded minimum or maximum, only the average of 80 FPS.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: lower settings and lower resolutions produce higher frame rates, and the system only becomes playable at 1080p with Medium or Low presets.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer depends entirely on the resolution and settings. Based on the verdict data, this combo is playable only at 1920x1080.

At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best average is 29 FPS on Low, which is 31 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. The system cannot deliver a smooth experience at 4K under any preset.

At 2560x1440, there are also no playable settings. The best average is 53 FPS on Low, which is 7 FPS below the threshold. Even at the lowest settings, the GPU cannot reach the playable mark at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system is playable on two presets. Low settings produce an average of 80 FPS, which is well above the threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 63 FPS, which clears the threshold by 3 FPS. The best playable preset is Medium, with an average of 63 FPS. High and Ultra presets at 1080p are not playable, with averages of 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.

The verdict is straightforward: this PC can run Fivem at 1080p with Medium settings, and it can run at 1080p with Low settings for a more comfortable margin above the threshold. For 1440p or 4K, the system is not playable, and users would need to accept significantly reduced settings or a lower resolution. The data shows a system that is fundamentally limited by its GPU, and the 60 FPS threshold is only reachable at the lowest resolution tested.

FAQ

Q: What is the best playable settings preset for this combo in Fivem?

A: At 1920x1080, Medium settings provide an average of 63 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings provide 80 FPS average as an alternative.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 2560x1440?

A: No. The highest average at 2560x1440 is 53 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. No preset at this resolution is playable.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (0.4% lower). All are within a fraction of a percent.

Q: What is the frame rate at 1920x1080 on Ultra settings?

A: The average frame rate at 1920x1080 on Ultra settings is 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (1.4% lower).

Q: What is the combo rank of this system in Fivem?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the lower portion of the database.