Fivem

Yes — the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 run FiveM well at 1080p and 1440p, with the measured data showing Ultra settings viable at 1920x1080 (86 FPS average) and High settings viable at 2560x1440 (73 FPS average). Only native 4K forces compromises, where Low is the single preset that clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at 64 FPS. The pairing sits in the top half of all tested hardware configurations for this multiplayer title, ranking 2172 out of 3707, and the underlying component quality — a CPU in the 77th percentile versus all CPUs and a GPU in the 59th percentile versus all GPUs — explains that mid-to-upper placement. Below is the full breakdown of what the measurements show at each resolution and preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that holds at least 60 FPS at each resolution is straightforward from the measured data:

• 1920x1080 — Ultra, 86 FPS average. All four presets are playable at 1080p, and Ultra clears the threshold with room to spare. There is no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution.
• 2560x1440 — High, 73 FPS average. Low, Medium and High all stay above 60 FPS; Ultra falls to 56 FPS and misses the cut. High is the ceiling.
• 3840x2160 — Low, 64 FPS average. Low is the only playable preset at native 4K. Medium averages 50 FPS, High 40, and Ultra 31 — none of them reach the threshold.

The pattern is consistent: each step up in resolution removes roughly one usable preset tier. A player who wants maximum image quality at 60 FPS should therefore target 1080p Ultra; a player who wants higher pixel density should accept High at 1440p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates this game is GPU-bound at higher resolutions on this configuration. The evidence is in the scaling between resolutions at fixed settings: at Ultra, average FPS falls from 86 at 1920x1080 to 56 at 2560x1440 and 31 at 3840x2160 — a drop of roughly a third per resolution step. At Low, the same progression is 175, 115, and 64 FPS. When frame rate falls this steeply as resolution rises while the CPU stays constant, the GPU is the limiting component: the Radeon RX 9060 is being fed more pixels than it can comfortably render at 1440p Ultra and all of 4K beyond Low.

Preset scaling tells the complementary story. At 1920x1080, moving from Low to Ultra cuts the average from 175 to 86 FPS — slightly more than half the frame rate lost to settings alone. The fact that the CPU-heavy Low preset reaches 175 FPS at 1080p shows the Core i5-13400F is not the bottleneck; the frame rate ceiling at low settings is far above anything the presets demand. With a single-thread Passmark score of 3634, a Geekbench single-core score of 1996, and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191, the processor carries more than enough per-core throughput for a multiplayer title of this era, released in 2017. The practical conclusion: to gain FPS at 1440p and 4K, lower GPU settings — not CPU settings — because the processor headroom is already ample.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All numbers below are measured averages for the i5-13400F + RX 9060 pairing in FiveM; minimum and maximum figures were captured only at Medium preset runs.

1920x1080

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 175 | — | — |

| Medium | 138 | 117 | 159 |

| High | 111 | — | — |

| Ultra | 86 | — | — |

Every preset at 1080p is playable. Even Ultra's 86 FPS average sits comfortably above 60, and the Medium run never dipped below 117 FPS, with peaks at 159 — a tight frame-time envelope that points to a smooth experience rather than one propped up by a high average with severe dips.

2560x1440

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 115 | — | — |

| Medium | 91 | 77 | 105 |

| High | 73 | — | — |

| Ultra | 56 | — | — |

Three of four presets clear 60 FPS. Medium's minimum of 77 FPS confirms that High's 73 average is a genuine threshold-crosser rather than a marginal case. Ultra at 56 FPS misses by a small margin — close enough that selective setting reductions below full Ultra would likely bridge the gap, though the data here only covers preset-level results.

3840x2160

| Preset | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|

| Low | 64 | — | — |

| Medium | 50 | 43 | 58 |

| High | 40 | — | — |

| Ultra | 31 | — | — |

Native 4K is the weak spot. Low at 64 FPS is the only playable result, and Medium's measured range of 43 to 58 FPS shows it never even peaks above the threshold. Ultra at 31 FPS average is less than half the playability line. The verdict: this pairing is not a native-4K combination for this game unless visual fidelity is sacrificed heavily.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25292 places it effectively dead even with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 — a 0% delta — and the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D sit at 25362 and 25365 respectively, both just 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H trails slightly at 25201, 0.4% behind. Any of these processors would deliver indistinguishable FiveM performance in this configuration, because the game is GPU-limited at higher settings anyway.

For the GPU, the RX 9060 averages 16014 against rival scores of 16129 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% ahead), 15862 for the AMD Radeon R9 370X and 15852 for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (both 1% behind), and 15679 for the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (2.1% behind). Swapping the RX 9060 for any of these cards would shift frame rates by at most around one percent in each direction — meaning the RTX 3060 Ti would render essentially identical FPS, and none of these alternatives would unlock 1440p Ultra or make 4K Medium playable. Players already owning one of these GPUs can treat the numbers in this breakdown as their own expected results.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3707 tested hardware combinations in FiveM, the i5-13400F + RX 9060 ranks 2172nd. That places it above the median but well outside the leaderboard's top tier, which is consistent with the component percentiles: the CPU sits in the 77th percentile versus all CPUs while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile versus all GPUs. The GPU is the anchor dragging the pairing's relative standing, and the measured results confirm it — strong relative performance at 1080p where the CPU's headroom matters, progressively mid-pack results as resolution climbs and the RX 9060 becomes the limiter. For a multiplayer game where high, stable frame rates matter more than maximum fidelity, the ranking still supports a capable experience at the two most common gaming resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can the i5-13400F + RX 9060 run FiveM at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, at 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080 every preset from Low to Ultra exceeds 60 FPS (86 FPS at Ultra). At 2560x1440, Low, Medium and High are playable, with High averaging 73 FPS. At 3840x2160 only Low clears the bar, at 64 FPS.

Q: What are the best settings for this combo in FiveM?

A: Ultra at 1920x1080 (86 FPS average), High at 2560x1440 (73 FPS average), and Low at 3840x2160 (64 FPS average) — each is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold at that resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck?

A: The GPU. Frame rates drop sharply as resolution rises — from 86 FPS at 1080p Ultra to 56 at 1440p and 31 at 4K — while the Low preset reaches 175 FPS at 1080p, showing the i5-13400F has ample headroom.

Q: Would a different GPU in the same class change the results?

A: Not meaningfully. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 0.7% higher on average, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 and Radeon R9 370X score about 1% lower — differences too small to move any preset across the 60 FPS line.

Q: How does this pairing compare to other tested combinations?

A: It ranks 2172 out of 3707 combos in FiveM — above the midpoint, reflecting a 77th-percentile CPU paired with a 59th-percentile GPU.

Q: Is 4K playable at all?

A: Barely, and only at Low settings, which average 64 FPS. Medium at 4K measures 43 to 58 FPS across its range, never reaching the threshold even at peak, so native 4K beyond Low is not recommended on this hardware.