Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
128 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
169 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 60 77 94
1440p QHD 85 109 133 169
1080p Full HD 128 164 205 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 205
1920x1080 Ultra 128
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Low 169
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Low 94
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is a formidable combination for Fivem, a multiplayer title that scales well across a wide range of hardware. The measured frame rates show that this combo is capable of delivering high refresh rate gameplay at mainstream resolutions, while also managing 4K at respectable settings. The data indicates that the CPU and GPU work in concert, with the RTX 4070 providing the raw graphical horsepower to push past 60 FPS thresholds in most scenarios, while the i5-12600KF’s strong multi-core performance (evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391) prevents bottlenecks from ruining the experience. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, identifies the optimal settings per resolution, compares the combo to its nearest rivals, and provides a clear verdict on its playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this system handles Fivem across three resolutions and four quality presets. The data shows a predictable pattern of decreasing performance as resolution and quality settings increase, with the most demanding combination yielding the lowest average frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. The Low preset produces an average of 257.9 FPS, which is nearly double the 128 FPS average seen at Ultra settings. The Medium preset averages 204.8 FPS, while High averages 163.7 FPS. Even the most demanding setting at this resolution, Ultra, maintains an average of 128 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the RTX 4070 is not the limiting factor; the CPU and GPU are both operating well within their capabilities, leaving ample headroom for high refresh rate monitors.

Moving up to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong, though the scaling is clear. The Low preset delivers an average of 169.2 FPS, which is a drop of 88.7 FPS from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 133.3 FPS, and High drops to 108.8 FPS. At Ultra, the average is 84.7 FPS. The progression shows a roughly 34% decrease in performance from Low to Ultra at this resolution, indicating that the GPU is beginning to work harder, but the overall experience remains fluid and responsive.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit, as expected. The Low preset still manages a solid 94.4 FPS average. The Medium preset averages 76.9 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS. The High preset drops to 59.6 FPS, just under the playable threshold, and the Ultra preset falls to 44.9 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: the RTX 4070’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient for 4K, but the rendering load at High and Ultra settings exceeds what this GPU can handle to maintain a comfortable frame rate.

It is importantly the measured FPS data does not include minimum or maximum frame rate values, so the analysis is based solely on the average FPS. However, the consistency of the averages across multiple presets suggests the combo is stable.

Best Settings per Resolution

The primary goal is to identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution. The verdict data provides this exact information.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, with an average of 128 FPS. This is the highest quality setting tested, and it still delivers a frame rate that is more than twice the playable threshold. Benchmarks indicate that this combo has significant headroom at this resolution, making it ideal for high refresh rate gaming.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also takes the top spot, with an average of 84.7 FPS. This is a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, and the visual quality improvement over Medium or High settings is substantial. The data shows that this is the sweet spot for this resolution, balancing image quality with a smooth, responsive experience.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 76.9 FPS. The High preset falls just short at 59.6 FPS, which is technically below the playable threshold. Therefore, for a guaranteed 60+ FPS experience at 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. The data indicates that this is the ceiling for this combo at 4K, as the Ultra preset’s 44.9 FPS average is too low for smooth gameplay.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for both the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would perform similarly in this combination.

For the Intel Core i5-12600KF, the closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Core i9-10900K, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The i9-10900K scores 27872, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-12600KF’s 27799 average score. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also 0.3% lower. These deltaPct values are minimal, indicating that swapping the i5-12600KF for any of these CPUs would result in a nearly identical performance profile in Fivem. The Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, which is 0.3% higher, and the Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, which is 0.3% lower. All four rivals are within a fraction of a percent of the i5-12600KF, meaning the CPU is not a differentiator in this combo.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400. The Tesla P4 scores 37628, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4070’s 37648 average score. The RX Vega 56 scores 37507, which is 0.4% lower. The RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher, and the Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, which is 1.3% lower. These deltaPct values are larger than those for the CPU, but still relatively small. The RTX 4080 Mobile is the closest competitor in terms of being faster, but the difference is negligible in practice. The RX Vega 56 and PRO W6400 would be slightly slower, but the overall frame rate differences in Fivem would likely be within a few FPS at most.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s position in the database is given by the `comboRankInGame` field, which shows a rank of 954 out of 3707 tested combinations. This places the Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in the top 25.7% of all tested combos for Fivem.

This ranking is a strong indicator of overall capability. The data shows that this combo outperforms the majority of systems tested, likely due to the balance between the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s modern architecture. While it is not the absolute top-tier combination, it sits comfortably in the upper quartile, making it a high-performing setup for this game. The ranking reflects that this combo is well-suited for Fivem’s demands, offering a smooth experience across the board.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear based on the `verdictByResolution` data. This PC can run Fivem with high quality settings at both 1080p and 1440p, and it can handle 4K with a medium preset.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, including Ultra, which averages 128 FPS. This is a definitive pass, with performance that supports high refresh rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the system also clears the threshold at every preset, with Ultra averaging 84.7 FPS. This is a pass, and the visual quality at this resolution is excellent.

At 3840x2160, the system is partially successful. The Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium averaging 76.9 FPS. The High preset falls below the threshold at 59.6 FPS, and Ultra is not playable at 44.9 FPS. Therefore, the verdict is a pass for Medium settings, but a fail for High and Ultra.

In summary, this combo is a capable gaming system for Fivem, offering a high-quality experience at 1080p and 1440p, and a solid medium-quality experience at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

Understanding which component is the driving force at each resolution is key. The data shows that the CPU’s role is more pronounced at lower resolutions, while the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the performance difference between Low and Ultra presets is 129.9 FPS (from 257.9 down to 128). This massive scaling is primarily due to the GPU’s workload increasing with higher quality settings. However, the fact that the system achieves 257.9 FPS at Low suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a very high rate. The i5-12600KF’s high single-thread performance (a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1016) is likely a factor here, as Fivem’s multiplayer nature can be CPU-dependent for physics and network processing.

At 2560x1440, the scaling from Low (169.2 FPS) to Ultra (84.7 FPS) is a drop of 84.5 FPS. The absolute frame rates are lower than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is now having to work harder to fill the extra pixels. The CPU is still keeping up, but the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the scaling is most pronounced. The Low preset averages 94.4 FPS, but the Ultra preset drops to 44.9 FPS, a difference of 49.5 FPS. The GPU is now the clear bottleneck, as the rendering load at 4K is immense. The CPU’s role is diminished, as the frame rate is limited by the GPU’s ability to process the higher resolution geometry and textures.

The data suggests that for this game, the RTX 4070 is the more critical component at 1440p and 4K, while the i5-12600KF provides a solid foundation that prevents CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured data shows an average of 44.9 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60+ FPS at 4K?

A: The Medium preset is the best option, with an average of 76.9 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: How does this combo perform at 1440p?

A: It is fully playable at all presets. The Ultra preset averages 84.7 FPS at 2560x1440, providing a smooth experience.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?

A: At 1080p, the CPU and GPU are well balanced. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, as evidenced by the larger FPS drops when increasing resolution.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank for Fivem?

A: It ranks 954 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 25.7% of all systems.

Q: Are there CPUs that perform similarly to the i5-12600KF in this combo?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D have average benchmark scores within 0.3% of the i5-12600KF, meaning they would deliver nearly identical performance.