Fivem

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a compelling performance profile for Fivem, placing this specific combination at rank 724 out of 3707 tested combos. This percentile positioning, roughly in the top 19.5% of all tested hardware pairings, indicates a system that is far above average for this multiplayer title. The data shows a configuration that handles the game’s demands with significant headroom, though the playable experience varies predictably across resolutions and graphical presets. The following analysis breaks down the benchmark results to illustrate exactly where this combo excels and where its limits appear.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this CPU-GPU pairing at rank 724 out of 3707 combinations tested for Fivem. That positions it in the 80th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly one in five tested combos outperforms it. For a mainstream six-core processor paired with a current-generation graphics card, this is a strong showing. The rank reflects the balance between the Intel Core i5-12400F’s processing capabilities and the RTX 5070’s rendering throughput, resulting in a system that consistently delivers high frame rates. When interpreting this rank, it is essential to consider that Fivem is a multiplayer modification framework, which often introduces CPU overhead beyond typical single-player titles. The i5-12400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears well-suited to handle these demands, as evidenced by the high average FPS figures across nearly all tested settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearestRivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware might behave similarly. The Intel Core i5-12400F’s nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, with a deltaPct of 0. This indicates virtually identical synthetic performance, suggesting that systems using the Ryzen 5 7535HS would likely produce similar frame rates in Fivem, assuming a comparable GPU. The Intel Core 3 201E is also a close match, with a negligible 0.1% lower average score. On the GPU side, the RTX 5070’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100, showing deltaPct values of 0.1% and 0.8% higher average scores, respectively. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 trails by 1.2%, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% ahead. These comparisons suggest that a system swapping the RTX 5070 for a Radeon Pro 580 or WX 7100 would deliver a nearly identical experience in Fivem, provided the CPU remains constant. The close margins in these rival scores—all within a 2% band—indicate that the RTX 5070’s performance tier is well-established, with no dramatic outliers in this specific benchmark grouping.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS at Low settings reaches 279.7, dropping to 176.2 at High and 137.5 at Ultra. This wide spread—from roughly 280 down to 137 FPS—indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary scaling factor, as increasing graphical load substantially impacts frame rates. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score of 909 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1680 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, appears capable of feeding frames well above the 279.7 FPS ceiling at Low settings, suggesting it is not the limiting factor at this resolution. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates compress modestly: Low produces 187 FPS, High 116.6, and Ultra 89.4. The reduction from 279.7 FPS at 1080p Low to 187 FPS at 1440p Low shows the GPU’s rendering load increasing, but the CPU still maintains high output. At 3840x2160, the pattern becomes more pronounced: Low yields 103.2 FPS, High 64.4, and Ultra falls to 52.9 FPS. Here, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p, and frame rates scale downward accordingly. The data implies that for Fivem, the RTX 5070 is the performance ceiling at 4K, while the i5-12400F provides sufficient headroom at lower resolutions. The scaling between presets at each resolution reinforces this: at 1080p, Ultra is 50.8% slower than Low, while at 4K, Ultra is 48.7% slower than Low, a similar relative drop that points to consistent GPU-bound behavior as settings increase.

FAQ

Q: What is the best playable setting at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding setting that maintains an average FPS above 60, achieving 64.4 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 52.9 FPS.

Q: Does this combo exceed 60 FPS at 1440p on Ultra settings?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the system averages 89.4 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How much faster is Low settings compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce an average of 279.7 FPS, while Ultra yields 137.5 FPS. This represents a 142.2 FPS difference, with Low being approximately 103% faster.

Q: What is the CPU’s synthetic benchmark performance relative to its rivals?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, which is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 (0% delta) and the Intel Core 3 201E at 19056 (-0.1% delta). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X, both at 0.3% higher scores.

Q: Is the GPU more important than the CPU at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates yes. At 3840x2160, frame rates range from 103.2 FPS at Low to 52.9 FPS at Ultra, showing a strong dependency on GPU load. The CPU’s performance remains constant across resolutions, so the frame rate drop at 4K is attributable to the GPU’s rendering limits.

Q: What is the playable settings list at 4K?

A: According to the verdict data, the playable settings at 3840x2160 are High, Low, and Medium, with average FPS of 64.4, 103.2, and 78.9 respectively. The Ultra preset is not playable as it drops below 60 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all three resolutions and four presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates: Low averages 279.7 FPS, Medium 220 FPS, High 176.2 FPS, and Ultra 137.5 FPS. The progression shows a clear linear degradation as graphical fidelity increases, with a 142.2 FPS gap between the lowest and highest presets. At 2560x1440, the numbers remain strong: Low averages 187 FPS, Medium 145.7 FPS, High 116.6 FPS, and Ultra 89.4 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant—279.7 to 187 FPS at Low, a 33.1% reduction—indicating the increased pixel count impacts the GPU substantially. At 3840x2160, performance becomes more constrained: Low averages 103.2 FPS, Medium 78.9 FPS, High 64.4 FPS, and Ultra 52.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Notably, the minFps and maxFps fields are null across all measurements, meaning the data only reflects average frame rates without variance metrics. The scaling from 1440p to 4K continues the trend: at Low, the drop is from 187 to 103.2 FPS, a 44.8% reduction, while at Ultra, it drops from 89.4 to 52.9 FPS, a 40.8% reduction. This consistent percentage decrease suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, with the CPU maintaining adequate frame delivery.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the best settings represent the most demanding preset that still maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the highest playable setting, delivering an average of 137.5 FPS. This provides massive headroom over the threshold, allowing for maximum graphical quality without any performance concerns. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, achieving 89.4 FPS. This still leaves nearly 30 FPS of headroom, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding multiplayer scenarios. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: the Ultra preset drops to 52.9 FPS, below the threshold, so the best playable setting is High, which averages 64.4 FPS. The choice between High and Medium at 4K is clear—High offers better visual fidelity while still clearing 60 FPS, with a 14.5 FPS margin. The data shows that this combo is fully capable of running Fivem at maximum settings up to 1440p, while 4K users must dial back to High for a stable 60 FPS experience.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 can run Fivem with high performance across most configurations. The verdictByResolution field confirms playable status at all three tested resolutions, but with varying degrees of graphical freedom. At 1920x1080, the system runs the game flawlessly at Ultra settings with an average of 137.5 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also remain playable, averaging 89.4 FPS, providing a high-refresh-rate experience with maximum fidelity. The only compromise occurs at 3840x2160, where the Ultra preset falls to 52.9 FPS—below the playable threshold—but the High preset at 64.4 FPS still delivers a smooth experience. For players prioritizing visual quality at 4K, the High preset is the recommended ceiling, while those seeking maximum frame rates can utilize Low settings for 103.2 FPS. Overall, this combo is more than sufficient for Fivem, offering a playable experience at every resolution tested, with the caveat that 4K Ultra is the sole configuration that demands a settings reduction to maintain 60 FPS. The system’s rank of 724 out of 3707 combos underscores its above-average capability, making it a strong choice for this multiplayer title.