Fivem

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, yes, but only on Low or Medium settings. The recorded data shows 80 FPS on Low and 63 FPS on Medium at this resolution. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1080p?

A: Medium is the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS, with an average of 63 FPS. High drops to 50 FPS and Ultra falls to 39 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400F compare to similar CPUs?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19047, a difference of 0%. The Intel Core 3 201E trails by 0.1%, while the Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% behind.

Q: What is the GPU performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. Its closest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% behind.

Q: Is 4K playable at all?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 29 FPS average. Medium hits 23 FPS, High drops to 18 FPS, and Ultra sits at 14 FPS. All fall well below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in Fivem?

A: The GPU dominates the performance picture. The Arc B370's 5th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 73rd percentile means the graphics card severely limits frame rates. The CPU has ample headroom; the GPU cannot keep up at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have close neighbors in the database that would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem.

For the Intel Core i5-12400F, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is the exact match with a 0% delta in average benchmark score (19047 vs 19039). The Intel Core 3 201E is essentially equivalent at 0.1% lower, and the Intel Core i5-1335U sits 0.3% behind. The AMD EPYC 7773X also matches within 0.3%. Any of these processors would deliver indistinguishable CPU-bound performance in Fivem. Since the game's frame rates here are clearly GPU-limited, swapping in any of these CPUs would change almost nothing in the measured FPS.

For the Intel Arc B370, the nearest GPU rivals are all older discrete parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, just 0.2% above the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% slower. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4%. In practical terms, a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similar-class CPU would produce the same Fivem experience: playable at 1080p Low and Medium, but not above that.

If you are considering an upgrade path, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. A CPU swap within the rival group would not move the needle. The Arc B370's 5th percentile ranking means even modest GPU upgrades would produce large FPS gains, while CPU upgrades would yield negligible improvements in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 8% of all configurations. That low ranking is driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU's 73rd percentile score shows it is a well-above-average processor, but the Arc B370's 5th percentile score drags the combined result down.

To contextualize the rank: roughly 287 combos perform worse, and 3420 perform better in this game. The combination is workable for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but it cannot compete with mainstream gaming setups in the database. The rank aligns with the measured FPS data: the combo delivers 60+ FPS only at 1080p Low and Medium, which is a modest result by current standards.

The gap between CPU and GPU performance is stark. A CPU in the 73rd percentile paired with a GPU in the 5th percentile creates a heavily imbalanced system for Fivem. The game's frame rates reflect the GPU's limitations at every resolution. If you were to pair this CPU with a mid-range GPU, the combo rank would jump dramatically. Conversely, pairing this GPU with a weaker CPU would barely change the rank, since the GPU already caps performance.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but only at 1920x1080. The verdict data lists Low and Medium as playable at this resolution, with Medium being the best playable preset at 63 FPS average. At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS: Low manages 53 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation is worse: Low hits 29 FPS, Medium 23 FPS, High 18 FPS, and Ultra 14 FPS.

For the target of 60 FPS, 1080p is the only viable resolution. The 63 FPS average on Medium includes a minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 72 FPS, meaning there will be occasional dips below 60 but the experience is largely smooth. Dropping to Low raises the average to 80 FPS, providing more headroom for busy multiplayer scenes. Higher resolutions are not recommended for 60 FPS gaming.

The verdict is clear: this is a 1080p machine for Fivem. If you play at 1440p or 4K, you will need to accept frame rates in the 20-50 range, which is below the playable threshold. The system is not useless, but its ceiling is firmly at 1080p Medium.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a massive imbalance between CPU and GPU capability. The i5-12400F's 3dmark scores (5895 at 16 threads, 5912 at max threads) and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 indicate a strong modern processor. Its 73rd percentile ranking confirms it is well above average. The Arc B370, by contrast, sits in the 5th percentile with a single 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 1184.

In Fivem, the GPU is the dominant constraint at every resolution. Look at the scaling: at 1080p, dropping from Medium to Low increases FPS from 63 to 80, a 27% gain. At 1440p, the same settings change goes from 41 to 53 FPS, a 29% gain. At 4K, Medium to Low goes from 23 to 29 FPS, a 26% gain. These consistent gains from lowering settings indicate the GPU is saturated at all resolutions.

CPU involvement is harder to isolate from this data, but the evidence points to minimal CPU pressure. If the CPU were a bottleneck, lowering graphics settings would not produce such consistent FPS improvements. The CPU's high benchmark scores relative to the GPU's low ones suggest it has plenty of spare capacity. Even at 1080p Low with 80 FPS, the CPU is likely not the limiting factor.

Resolution scaling tells the same story. Going from 1080p to 1440p at Medium drops FPS from 63 to 41, a 35% reduction. Going from 1440p to 4K at Medium drops from 41 to 23, a 44% reduction. These large drops with increasing pixel count are classic GPU-bound behavior. The GPU simply cannot sustain higher fill rates.

For this game, upgrading the GPU would yield the largest FPS gains. The CPU is more than adequate for Fivem's demands, even in busy multiplayer scenarios. If you own this combo and want better performance, the GPU is the component to replace.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset meets the 60 FPS threshold. The best available option is Low at 29 FPS average, but this is far below playable. Medium offers 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and maximum of 26. High and Ultra are worse at 18 and 14 FPS respectively. None of these are recommended for actual play.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar. Low is the fastest at 53 FPS, but it still misses the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 41 FPS with a range of 35 to 48. High drops to 33 FPS, and Ultra falls to 26 FPS. None of these clear the playable bar.

At 1920x1080, the system finally becomes playable. Medium is the best preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72. This is the recommended setting for balanced visuals and performance. If you prefer maximum smoothness, Low runs at 80 FPS average. High falls below the threshold at 50 FPS, and Ultra is not viable at 39 FPS.

The practical recommendation is simple: play at 1080p on Medium. This gives you the highest visual quality that maintains 60 FPS on average. If you experience dips in crowded multiplayer areas, switching to Low provides a 27% FPS buffer. Avoid 1440p and 4K entirely, as no settings there reach the playable threshold.