Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

59%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
82 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
61 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 18,683
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 39 48 61
1440p QHD 54 70 87 110
1080p Full HD 82 106 132 168

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 168
1920x1080 Medium 132
1920x1080 Ultra 82
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Low 61
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a wide range of frame rates in Fivem depending on resolution and quality preset. At 1920x1080, the combo produces 168 FPS on Low, 132 FPS on Medium, 106 FPS on High, and 82 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the measured averages drop to 110 FPS on Low, 87 FPS on Medium, 70 FPS on High, and 54 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the averages fall further to 61 FPS on Low, 48 FPS on Medium, 39 FPS on High, and 30 FPS on Ultra. The only preset with min and max data is Medium at each resolution: at 1920x1080, the range spans 112 to 152 FPS; at 2560x1440, it spans 74 to 100 FPS; at 3840x2160, it spans 41 to 56 FPS. All other settings list only average FPS without min or max values.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data for Fivem covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with average FPS recorded for every combination and min/max FPS provided only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 168 FPS, which is the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. The Medium preset at this resolution averages 132 FPS, with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS, indicating that even the lowest dips remain well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 106 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 82 FPS. None of these settings at 1920x1080 fall below the playable threshold, based on the averages provided.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 110 FPS, representing a drop of 58 FPS compared to the same preset at 1920x1080. The Medium preset averages 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. This min value stays above 60 FPS, so even the worst-case frame time recorded for Medium at this resolution remains playable. The High preset averages 70 FPS, which is 36 FPS lower than the 106 FPS seen at 1920x1080 High. The Ultra preset averages 54 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold. No min or max data exists for Low, High, or Ultra at 2560x1440, so the analysis relies solely on the average values.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 61 FPS, which barely clears the playable threshold. The Medium preset averages 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS, meaning every recorded frame is below 60 FPS. The High preset averages 39 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 30 FPS. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at this resolution is 31 FPS, which is the largest spread across any resolution in the dataset. The Medium preset’s min and max values at 3840x2160 show a 15 FPS swing, while at 2560x1440 the same preset shows a 26 FPS swing and at 1920x1080 a 40 FPS swing, indicating that frame time variability narrows as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the full database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 holds a rank of 2275 out of 3707 combos. That places it in the lower half of all tested systems, though the raw FPS numbers at lower resolutions show it is far from incapable. The rank reflects aggregate performance across all resolutions and presets, not just the best-case scenario. Since the dataset includes 3707 combos, a rank of 2275 means roughly 1432 combinations perform better and roughly 1432 perform worse, based on the total count minus the rank position.

The combo’s percentile standing among all CPUs places the Intel Core i5-12400 at the 72nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 18683. Its nearest CPU rivals in terms of average score include the AMD EPYC 7643 at 18697 with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i7-1355U at 18730 with a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 at 18811 with a delta of -0.7%, and the Intel Core i3-14100F at 18519 with a delta of 0.9%. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the i5-12400 sits in a tightly packed cluster of similar-performing processors. The GPU percentile places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest GPU rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153 with a delta of -0.6%, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M at 21237 with a delta of -1%, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT at 20713 with a delta of 1.6%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile at 21379 with a delta of -1.6%. Again, these deltas are small, meaning the RTX 5050’s raw benchmark score is comparable to several other graphics solutions.

Despite the mid-pack overall rank, the FPS results show that this combo’s position is heavily influenced by 4K performance, where only the Low preset reaches playability. At 1080p and 1440p, the system performs well above average in terms of raw FPS, but the rank aggregates all data points, pulling it down due to the weaker 4K results.

CPU and GPU Roles

The interaction between the Intel Core i5-12400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Fivem can be inferred from how FPS scales across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 168 FPS, which is 86 FPS higher than the Ultra preset’s 82 FPS at the same resolution. This large spread suggests that the GPU is heavily engaged even at lower settings, as reducing graphical load from Ultra to Low yields a massive frame rate increase. The CPU’s role becomes more apparent when comparing resolutions at the same preset. For example, the Low preset drops from 168 FPS at 1920x1080 to 110 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 58 FPS, and then to 61 FPS at 3840x2160, another reduction of 49 FPS. This progressive decline as resolution increases indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU likely maintains sufficient throughput to feed the graphics card at lower resolutions.

At the Medium preset, the frame rates are 132 FPS at 1920x1080, 87 FPS at 2560x1440, and 48 FPS at 3840x2160. The step from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by 45, and the step from 1440p to 4K reduces it by 39. These consistent drops point to a GPU-limited scenario across all resolutions for Medium settings. The High preset shows 106 FPS at 1920x1080, 70 FPS at 2560x1440, and 39 FPS at 3840x2160, with reductions of 36 and 31 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset shows 82 FPS at 1920x1080, 54 FPS at 2560x1440, and 30 FPS at 3840x2160, with reductions of 28 and 24 FPS. The diminishing absolute FPS drops at higher presets as resolution increases suggest that the GPU is saturating, and the CPU’s influence fades once pixel throughput dominates. At 1920x1080, the CPU likely has more headroom, allowing the GPU to run at higher utilization and produce the high frame rates seen on Low and Medium. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only manages 61 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s pixel and texture processing limits are the decisive factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 168 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-12400 + RTX 5050 combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset averages 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 48 FPS, High averages 39 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS.

Q: Which preset at 2560x1440 provides the best playable experience?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 averages 70 FPS, which is the highest average among playable presets at that resolution. Medium averages 87 FPS, and Low averages 110 FPS, but High offers a balance of quality and performance.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153 with a delta of -0.6%, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237 with a delta of -1%, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713 with a delta of 1.6%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 with a delta of -1.6%.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2275 out of 3707 tested combinations.

Q: Are there any presets at 1920x1080 that fall below 60 FPS?

A: No. All four presets at 1920x1080 exceed 60 FPS on average: Low at 168 FPS, Medium at 132 FPS, High at 106 FPS, and Ultra at 82 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 82 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available in the dataset, and it clears the playable threshold by 22 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution averages 132 FPS, and the High preset averages 106 FPS, but Ultra is the best choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that averages at least 60 FPS is High, with a measured average of 70 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 54 FPS, so it is not playable according to the threshold. Low and Medium also qualify, averaging 110 FPS and 87 FPS respectively, but High provides the best visual fidelity among playable options. At 3840x2160, the only preset that averages 60 FPS or above is Low, which achieves 61 FPS. All other presets at this resolution—Medium, High, and Ultra—fall below the threshold, with averages of 48 FPS, 39 FPS, and 30 FPS respectively. Therefore, Low is the only viable preset at 4K for maintaining playable frame rates.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 can run Fivem, but the playable settings depend heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system runs every preset above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 82 FPS, making it fully capable at the highest quality tested. At 2560x1440, the system runs Low, Medium, and High above 60 FPS, with High averaging 70 FPS; Ultra averages 54 FPS and is not playable. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 61 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K all fall short, with averages of 48, 39, and 30 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms these findings: 1920x1080 has all four presets listed as playable, with Ultra as the best settings at 82 FPS; 2560x1440 has High, Low, and Medium as playable, with High as the best at 70 FPS; 3840x2160 has only Low as playable, with Low as the best at 61 FPS. Users seeking higher quality at 1440p or 4K would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, include the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores 18697 with a delta of -0.1%, meaning it performs nearly identically. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730 with a delta of -0.3%, also very close. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811 with a delta of -0.7%, slightly higher in raw score. The Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519 with a delta of 0.9%, slightly lower. None of these CPUs differ from the i5-12400 by more than one percentage point in average benchmark score, so in Fivem, any of them would likely produce similar CPU-bound behavior, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU has more influence. For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which scores 21153 with a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, which scores 21237 with a delta of -1%. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713 with a delta of 1.6%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 with a delta of -1.6%. These deltas are all under two percentage points, indicating that swapping the RTX 5050 for any of these GPUs would result in similar frame rates in Fivem, assuming the CPU remains the same. The RX 5600 XT, with a positive delta of 1.6%, would be slightly slower on average, while the RTX A4000 Mobile would be slightly faster. In practice, the measured FPS differences would likely be within a few frames per second at each resolution and preset, given the narrow benchmark score margins.