Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
305 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
163 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
122 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 18,683
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 77 96 122
1440p QHD 107 138 173 219
1080p Full HD 163 210 263 305

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Low 305
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 Ultra 163
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 219
2560x1440 Medium 173
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a high-performance Fivem experience across all tested resolutions. Measured data shows this combination produces triple-digit frame rates at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, while maintaining a solid 60 FPS average at the demanding 3840x2160 Ultra preset. The benchmark results place this combo at rank 300 out of 3707 tested configurations, placing it in the top 8% of all recorded systems for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination covers three resolutions and four settings levels, providing a complete picture of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional frame rates starting with a 305 FPS average on Low settings. The Medium preset at this resolution delivers a 263 FPS average with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS, showing strong frame consistency. High settings at 1920x1080 yield a 210 FPS average, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a 163 FPS average.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains well above the 60 FPS playability threshold across all settings. The Low preset produces a 219 FPS average, followed by Medium at 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS and maximum of 199 FPS. High settings deliver a 138 FPS average, and Ultra settings still achieve a strong 107 FPS average. These numbers indicate that the RTX 4080 retains substantial headroom even at the higher pixel count of 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the performance profile becomes more demanding but remains playable throughout. The Low preset achieves a 122 FPS average, while Medium produces 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS. High settings deliver a 77 FPS average, and the Ultra preset holds at exactly 60 FPS average. The 4K Medium reading shows the narrowest frame distribution in the dataset, with only a 28 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, indicating stable frame pacing under moderate load.

The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows consistent scaling. At 1080p, the drop from Low to Ultra represents a 142 FPS reduction, while at 1440p the same settings range shows a 112 FPS difference. The 4K resolution shows a 62 FPS gap between Low and Ultra, reflecting the increased GPU workload at higher pixel densities.

Best Settings per Resolution

The playability threshold for this analysis is 60 FPS average, and the measured data shows every settings preset clears this bar at all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers a 163 FPS average. This leaves substantial performance headroom, suggesting the system is not GPU-limited at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again qualifies as the best playable setting, producing a 107 FPS average. The jump from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra represents a 56 FPS reduction, but the resulting frame rate remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold with room for demanding multiplayer scenarios.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves exactly 60 FPS average, making it the best setting that meets the playability criterion. The High preset at this resolution delivers 77 FPS, while Medium reaches 96 FPS, but Ultra remains the optimal choice for maximum visual quality while maintaining the target frame rate. The 4K Ultra result is precise — no margin for error, but the data confirms it passes the 60 FPS requirement.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 divide their workload in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the extremely high frame rates — 305 FPS on Low and 210 FPS on High — indicate the CPU plays a significant role, as the GPU would not be saturated at these pixel counts with a 48.74 TFLOPS card. The 142 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p suggests the GPU becomes more involved as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the scaling pattern continues but with smaller absolute differences. The Low preset at 219 FPS drops to 107 FPS at Ultra, a 112 FPS reduction. The RTX 4080's 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR6X buffer become more relevant at this resolution, though the CPU still contributes meaningfully to the upper frame rates observed.

The 3840x2160 results show the most pronounced GPU influence. The 122 FPS on Low settings at 4K indicates the CPU can still feed high frame rates when visual load is minimal, but the 60 FPS at Ultra demonstrates the GPU reaching its practical limit for this game at maximum settings. The 62 FPS decrease from Low to Ultra at 4K is the smallest absolute drop among all resolutions, showing that the GPU bottleneck grows as pixel count increases.

Comparing the Medium preset across resolutions provides the clearest component-role signal. The 263 FPS at 1080p Medium, 173 FPS at 1440p Medium, and 96 FPS at 4K Medium show a consistent degradation pattern. The 1080p to 1440p reduction is 90 FPS, while the 1440p to 4K reduction is 77 FPS. This suggests the CPU maintains adequate performance headroom, while the GPU workload scaling drives the frame rate differences between resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS in 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured data shows a 60 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which exactly meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The maximum measured average is 305 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the 1440p Ultra performance compare to 1080p Ultra?

A: The 2560x1440 Ultra preset delivers a 107 FPS average, while 1920x1080 Ultra produces 163 FPS, representing a 56 FPS difference between the two resolutions.

Q: Is there frame time consistency data available?

A: The Medium preset at each resolution includes minimum and maximum values. At 1080p Medium, frames range from 223 to 302 FPS; at 1440p Medium, 147 to 199 FPS; and at 4K Medium, 82 to 110 FPS.

Q: What percentile does this CPU rank among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 sits in the 72nd percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18683.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at all settings in 1440p?

A: Yes, every preset at 2560x1440 exceeds 60 FPS average, with the lowest being Ultra at 107 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-12400 provide context for CPU performance equivalence. The AMD EPYC 7643 shows an average score of 18697, which is 0.1% lower than the i5-12400's 18683 average score — a negligible difference. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, also 0.3% below the i5-12400. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 delivers 18811, representing a 0.7% higher score, while the Intel Core i3-14100F trails slightly at 18519, or 0.9% lower. These delta values indicate all four alternatives would perform within roughly one percent of the i5-12400 in Fivem, making them effectively interchangeable for this game's CPU demands.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080's nearest rivals show similar near-identical performance. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, just 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54247 average. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X achieves 54828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 at 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S reaches 55757, 2.7% higher. The close delta values suggest that swapping the RTX 4080 for any of these alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, with the largest variance being under three percent.

The Verdict

This system can run Fivem at every resolution and settings preset tested. The verdict by resolution confirms all three resolutions — 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 — list High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings. At 1920x1080, the best playable settings is Ultra with a 163 FPS average, providing a large margin above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 107 FPS average, still offering comfortable headroom for demanding scenes. At 3840x2160, Ultra achieves exactly 60 FPS average, meeting the playability requirement precisely.

The 4K Ultra result is the limiting case for this configuration. Anyone seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need to drop to High settings for 77 FPS or Medium for 96 FPS, but the data confirms Ultra remains viable. The RTX 4080's 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for Fivem's demands at all tested settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 300 out of 3707 tested combos in the Fivem benchmark database. This places the system in the top 8.1% of all recorded configurations, a strong result for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking among all graphics cards combine to produce a system that sits comfortably in the upper tier of Fivem performance.

The rank position reflects the balance between the i5-12400's six-core, twelve-thread design and the RTX 4080's substantial graphics throughput. While the CPU does not reach the top percentile, the GPU's high placement compensates, particularly at higher resolutions where graphics load dominates. The 300th rank out of 3707 combos indicates that only a small fraction of tested systems outperform this configuration, and the measured FPS data confirms the practical impact of this ranking across all settings and resolutions.