Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
262 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
129 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
169 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 18,683
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 62 73 92
1440p QHD 85 109 135 169
1080p Full HD 129 164 203 262

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 262
1920x1080 Medium 203
1920x1080 Ultra 129
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Low 169
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 62
3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

# Can the Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Run Fivem?

The pairing of Intel’s Core i5-12400 with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4070 is a classic high-end 1080p and 1440p configuration that also makes a credible entry into 4K territory. For Fivem, the data shows a system that is frankly overkill for standard 1080p monitors, extremely comfortable at 1440p, and still very playable at 4K with the right settings. This is a combo that prioritizes visual fidelity and smoothness, and the benchmark results confirm it delivers both in spades.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals from the fact pack, the AMD EPYC 7643 and Intel Core i7-1355U are the closest CPU competitors, while on the GPU side, the NVIDIA T4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 are the nearest neighbors.

The Core i5-12400 lands within a whisper of the AMD EPYC 7643 (0.1% slower in average benchmark score) and the Core i7-1355U (0.3% faster). This means the i5-12400 is effectively a peer of these chips in CPU-bound workloads, and the performance difference is within the margin of error for this class of hardware. The i5’s advantage in real-world gaming is minimal, but it does have a single-thread edge that matters in certain game logic. The data shows the i5-12400 is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i3-14100F, which is a meaningful gap in multi-threaded tasks.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 is 0.1% ahead of the Tesla P4, 0.4% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega 56, and it is 1.3% slower than the RTX 4080 Mobile. The 4070 sits in the upper 81st percentile of all GPUs in the database, which puts it well above the mainstream and into the enthusiast class.

CPU and GPU Roles

For FiveM, the division of labor between the i5-12400 and RTX 4070 is clear. The CPU handles the simulation of the game world — AI, physics, the "game logic" — while the GPU handles rendering, draw calls, and post-processing effects. Fivem is known to be heavily single-threaded on the CPU side, which makes the i5-12400’s strong single-core performance (910 in the 3DMark single-thread test) absolutely essential. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5873 shows there is headroom for background tasks like Discord or streaming overlays.

The RTX 4070, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and a Passmark G3D score of 26927, is a massive upgrade over the integrated graphics of the Core i5. At 1080p, the data shows the i5-12400 is capable of feeding frames far faster than the RTX 4070 can render them; the GPU is the sole bottleneck. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU load becomes balanced, and the CPU is no longer the limiting factor.

Scaling from 1080p to 1440p roughly doubles the pixel count, and the FPS data confirms that: at Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 203.1 to 135.1, a decrease that aligns with the added pixel workload. Moving to 4K doubles the pixel count again, and we see another drop in average FPS: 135.1 to 73 at Medium, and 84.6 to 48.4 at Ultra. The trend is consistent: the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU has enough headroom to feed it.

FAQ

Q: My CPU is an i5-12400F, not the 12400 with UHD Graphics. Is that a problem?

A: No. The i5-12400 and 12400F have identical CPU-core performance; the F-suffix simply disables the integrated GPU. Since you'll be using the dedicated RTX 4070 for video output, you lose nothing by not having the integrated GPU. The data for the 12400 remains valid for your chip.

Q: I play on a 2560x1440 monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate. Should I lower any settings to hit 60 FPS?

A: The data says yes — you can push Ultra at 1440p and average 84.6 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold. At High preset, you get 109.2 FPS. The GPU is the limiting factor here, so you have plenty of CPU headroom. You can set the game to Ultra and expect a locked 60 FPS with no problem.

Q: Can I install this in a small form factor (SFF) case?

A: The 65W TDP of the i5-12400 is easy to cool with a compact air cooler. The RTX 4070 is a dual-slot card with a 200W TDP. It uses a 1x16-pin power connector. You'll need a case that fits a dual-slot card; the card's length of 240mm (9.4 inches) is standard. The power supply should be rated for 550W.

Q: Does FiveM prefer NVIDIA over AMD?

A: The data shows a clear GPU-bound workload at 1080p and above. NVIDIA's driver support for FiveM is mature, and the RTX 40-series cards are a known quantity with good DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The CUDA-specific features are not strictly required, but NVIDIA's driver stability gives it the edge.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. This PC runs FiveM at 60 FPS with room to spare at 1080p and 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4070 is the bottleneck. The data shows the i5-12400 can sit idle at the Medium preset and still produce 203.1 FPS average. The GPU pulls the average down to 129.4 FPS even at Ultra, which is more than double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is Ultra, where the average FPS is 84.6. The GPU is still the main frame rate limiter, but the CPU has enough headroom to stream the game world without issue.

At 3840x2160, the "High" preset wins the playable settings with an average of 61.6 FPS. The "Ultra" preset drops to 48.4 average FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The CPU is no longer the bottleneck; the GPU is fully saturated at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following FPS values are from the measured data set for this combo:

3840x2160

| Settings | Avg FPS |

| --- | --- |

| High | 61.6 |

| Low | 92.3 |

| Medium | 73.0 |

| Ultra | 48.4 |

2560x1440

| Settings | Avg FPS |

| --- | --- |

| High | 109.0 |

| Low | 168.7 |

| Medium | 135.1 |

| Ultra | 84.6 |

1920x1080

| Settings | Avg FPS |

| --- | --- |

| High | 164 |

| Low | 262 |

| Medium | 203 |

| Ultra | 129 |

The data set is consistent: the "Low" preset always gives the highest average FPS, "Ultra" always the lowest. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets widens as resolution increases, from 133 FPS at 1080p to 180 FPS at 4K. This is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario.

How This Combo Ranks

This CPU+GPU combo is ranked #872 out of 3,707 tested combos in the game’s database. The percentile data places the CPU at the 72nd percentile (above average) and the GPU at the 81st percentile (top 20% of all GPUs). The RTX 4070 is clearly a high-end card that can power through 4K with settings dialed in. A strong 1440p setup, and a top-tier 1080p one. If you play on a 4K monitor, select the "High" preset and you'll get a stable 60 FPS line. At 1440p, you can max the settings out and still have a 40% FPS headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1080p, it's overkill — the CPU and GPU are both so fast the game will never break a sweat.