Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 583rd out of 3,707 tested combinations for Fivem. This places the combo in the top 16% of all recorded configurations, a strong result for a mainstream six-core processor paired with a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics card.

The CPU itself sits at the 71st percentile among all processors in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17,177. Its nearest rivals in aggregate CPU performance are the AMD EPYC 7H12 (0.3% higher average score), the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (0.6% higher), the Intel Core i5-12450H (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (0.6% lower). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the i5-11400F delivers compute performance essentially on par with a diverse set of server, mobile, and desktop parts.

The GPU is more dominant in the overall combination. The RTX 4070 Ti ranks at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,795. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (0.8% lower score), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (1.3% lower), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (1.6% higher), and the Intel Arc A730M (1.7% lower). The 4070 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the demands of Fivem's open-world multiplayer environments.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded FPS data reveals a consistent pattern: this combination is GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates climb dramatically.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset drops to 52.5 FPS, a 39.5% reduction from the High preset's 67.7 FPS. The gap between Low (113.9 FPS) and Medium (87.1 FPS) is also substantial, showing that the RTX 4070 Ti's rasterization throughput is the limiting factor when pixel counts are high. The GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 626.4 GTexel/s texture rate are simply insufficient to maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra in this multiplayer title.

At 2560x1440, the picture changes. The Ultra preset achieves 100.6 FPS, which is 91.6% higher than the 4K Ultra result. The scaling from 4K to 1440p at Ultra settings shows a 47.6 FPS improvement, indicating that the GPU still has headroom once pixel shading load drops. The Low preset at 1440p hits 200.4 FPS, approaching the CPU's practical frame delivery limit.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes the primary constraint. The Low preset runs at 260 FPS, but the Medium preset only drops to 242.2 FPS, a mere 6.8% reduction. Even the High preset at 193.3 FPS is only 25.7% below Low. This compression of frame rates across settings at 1080p indicates that the i5-11400F's six cores and twelve threads, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, are the bottleneck. The GPU could likely render more frames, but the CPU cannot feed it faster than roughly 260 FPS in this scenario.

The scaling between resolutions at the same preset reinforces this analysis. At High settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by 34.0% (193.3 to 127.7), and moving to 4K reduces it by another 47.0% (127.7 to 67.7). This progressive decline is characteristic of a GPU-limited workload at High and above. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 22.9% (260 to 200.4), and to 4K is 43.2% (200.4 to 113.9), showing that even at Low settings, the GPU still carries significant load at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database records average FPS for each resolution and preset combination. No minimum or maximum frame time data is available for this configuration, so the analysis relies on average frame rates.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 113.9 FPS average
• Medium: 87.1 FPS average
• High: 67.7 FPS average
• Ultra: 52.5 FPS average

The spread from Low to Ultra is 61.4 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, while High maintains a 7.7 FPS margin above it.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 200.4 FPS average
• Medium: 155.9 FPS average
• High: 127.7 FPS average
• Ultra: 100.6 FPS average

Every preset at 1440p clears 60 FPS by a wide margin. The Ultra preset delivers 40.6 FPS above the threshold, and even the most demanding setting leaves substantial headroom for multiplayer sessions with many players and vehicles.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 260 FPS average
• Medium: 242.2 FPS average
• High: 193.3 FPS average
• Ultra: 148.2 FPS average

All presets at 1080p are exceptionally playable. The Low preset approaches the CPU's frame delivery ceiling, while Ultra still produces nearly 2.5 times the 60 FPS threshold.

The pattern across resolutions shows that the RTX 4070 Ti's performance scales predictably with pixel count, while the i5-11400F imposes a practical upper limit around 260 FPS at 1080p Low. This is consistent with a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a single-thread 3DMark score of 868 and a Passmark single-thread score of 2,981.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS or better across all tested resolutions and most presets, with one exception.

At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low, Medium, and High. The Ultra preset falls short at 52.5 FPS average. The best playable setting is High, which produces 67.7 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable. The best setting is Ultra, delivering 100.6 FPS average.

At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable. The best setting is Ultra, delivering 148.2 FPS average.

For users with a 4K display, the recommendation is to run High settings for a stable experience above 60 FPS. For 1440p and 1080p displays, Ultra settings are fully viable, with frame rates that remain well above the playability threshold even in dense multiplayer scenarios.

The data shows that this combination is strongest at 1440p, where the GPU's capabilities are fully utilized without exceeding the CPU's delivery limits. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, but the resulting frame rates are still far above what any display can show in terms of smoothness.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 52.5, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest playable 4K setting is High at 67.7 FPS average.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 offers the best balance. Ultra settings run at 100.6 FPS average, which is 40.6 FPS above the threshold, and the frame rate remains high even in demanding scenes.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the frame rates compress across presets: Low runs at 260 FPS, Medium at 242.2 FPS, High at 193.3 FPS, and Ultra at 148.2 FPS. This smaller spread compared to higher resolutions indicates the Intel Core i5-11400F is the limiting factor at 1080p.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti strong enough for 1440p gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, even the Ultra preset achieves 100.6 FPS average, nearly double the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets at this resolution are playable.

Q: What settings should be avoided?

A: Only the 3840x2160 Ultra preset is not playable, with an average of 52.5 FPS. All other resolution and preset combinations in the database exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 583rd out of 3,707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 16% of all configurations in the database.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 67.7 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 100.6 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 148.2 FPS.

These selections maximize visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The 1440p Ultra result is particularly notable because it provides near-4K visual fidelity at a frame rate that exceeds most high-refresh-rate displays' capabilities.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest performance rivals, based on average benchmark scores, are all within 0.6% of the i5-11400F's 17,177 average. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17,120 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17,074 (0.6% higher), the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17,239 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17,278 (0.6% lower). Any of these processors would deliver near-identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem, meaning the frame rates at 1080p Low would be statistically indistinguishable.

The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly tight. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152 (0.8% lower than the 4070 Ti's 44,795), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384 (1.3% lower), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44,075 (1.6% higher), and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45,592 (1.7% lower). These GPUs would produce nearly identical results in Fivem at 4K, where the graphics card is the primary constraint.

For users considering alternative hardware, swapping the CPU to any of the listed rivals would change 1080p frame rates by less than 1%. Swapping the GPU to any listed rival would change 4K frame rates by less than 2%. The combination's rank of 583rd out of 3,707 is therefore representative of a broad cluster of similar-performing hardware, not an outlier configuration.