Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 67 | 84 | 106 |
| 1440p QHD | 93 | 120 | 151 | 191 |
| 1080p Full HD | 142 | 183 | 229 | 262 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
# How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER sits at rank 665 out of 3,707 tested combinations in the database for Fivem. That places this combo in the top 18 percent of all recorded configurations, a strong showing for a multiplayer-oriented title that often rewards both CPU throughput and GPU rasterization power. The CPU itself lands in the 71st percentile among all processors in the database, while the GPU reaches the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. When combined, the pairing produces frame rates that are competitive with far more expensive builds, though the data also reveals where the ceiling sits.
What makes this rank noteworthy is that Fivem, being a multiplayer modification of an older game engine, does not always scale cleanly with modern hardware. The recorded measurements show that this combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution tested, but the margin shrinks considerably at 4K with maximum settings. The rank of 665 out of 3,707 indicates that while many combos outperform this pairing, a substantial majority of tested configurations land below it. This is a mid-to-upper tier result, not a flagship one.
# CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals an interesting split in workload between the Core i5-11400F and the RTX 4070 SUPER depending on resolution and preset. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at 1920x1080 shows average FPS dropping from 262 to 142, a 46 percent reduction that is driven primarily by increased GPU load, yet the CPU still has headroom to spare. The 6-core, 12-thread Rocket Lake processor, with its 4.40 GHz boost clock, appears sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution.
At 1440p, the balance shifts. Average FPS at High settings reaches 120, while Ultra drops to 93. The RTX 4070 SUPER, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, begins to show its strength here. The GPU's compute capabilities, 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, are being exercised more fully, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint.
At 4K, the GPU dominates the performance picture. The RTX 4070 SUPER produces 67 FPS at High settings but only 52 FPS at Ultra, a clear sign that the graphics card is now the bottleneck. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, and the data suggests that the i5-11400F could likely support a more powerful GPU at lower resolutions without becoming a significant hindrance. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings illustrates this: 229 FPS at 1080p, 151 FPS at 1440p, and 84 FPS at 2160p. The GPU is doing progressively more of the heavy lifting.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded measurements provide a comprehensive picture across three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance. Low settings produce 262 FPS average, Medium hits 229 FPS with a minimum of 194 and maximum of 263, High reaches 183 FPS, and Ultra still manages 142 FPS. Every preset at 1080p is far beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding settings leaving massive headroom for high refresh rate displays.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers remain strong but show the expected decline. Low settings yield 191 FPS, Medium delivers 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 and maximum of 173, High produces 120 FPS, and Ultra stays playable at 93 FPS. The minimum recorded at Medium, 128 FPS, still doubles the playable threshold, indicating consistent frame delivery without severe dips.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture becomes more nuanced. Low settings produce 106 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS with a minimum of 71 and maximum of 96, High drops to 67 FPS, and Ultra falls to 52 FPS. The Medium preset shows the only recorded minimum and maximum values in the entire 4K dataset, suggesting the measurement captured a broader range of frame times in that configuration. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only tested combination that fails to clear 60 FPS, and even then, the shortfall is relatively modest at 8 FPS below the threshold.
# The Verdict
The data is clear: this PC can run Fivem, and it can run it well at most settings. The verdict by resolution shows that at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High providing the best visual quality at 67 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short of the 60 FPS target, so users seeking maximum visual fidelity at this resolution would need to accept a lower frame rate or dial back to High settings.
At 2560x1440, every preset is playable, including Ultra at 93 FPS average. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for this combo: the user can enable the highest settings and still maintain a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. The 120 FPS High preset and 151 FPS Medium preset provide excellent options for competitive play or smoother motion.
At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS bar with enormous room to spare. Ultra runs at 142 FPS, and Low reaches 262 FPS. This resolution is essentially a non-issue for the i5-11400F and RTX 4070 SUPER combination. The verdict is straightforward: for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo is more than capable at any setting. For 4K, it handles High settings comfortably but Ultra requires a compromise.
# Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, several alternatives would produce similar behavior in Fivem. On the CPU side, the AMD EPYC 7H12 has an average benchmark score of 17,120, which is 0.3 percent lower than the Core i5-11400F's 17,177. This server-oriented processor would deliver nearly identical frame rates in most scenarios, though its platform requirements differ significantly. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17,239, 0.4 percent higher, making it a close performance match. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17,278, 0.6 percent higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17,074, 0.6 percent lower.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43,262, just 0.1 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268, also 0.1 percent lower, and the Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, 0.2 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, 1 percent higher, representing the closest step up in raw GPU performance. Any of these alternatives would produce Fivem frame rates within a few percentage points of the RTX 4070 SUPER, though the workstation-oriented Quadro cards lack the same gaming feature set.
For users considering upgrades or substitutions, the data suggests that swapping the CPU to any of these near-identical performers would change results by less than one percent. Similarly, GPU swaps within this rival group would shift frame rates by only a small margin, making these components true drop-in equivalents for Fivem performance.
# FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 93 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best 4K setting for this PC?
A: High settings at 3840x2160 produce a 67 FPS average, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at that resolution. Ultra falls short at 52 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17,177. The AMD EPYC 7H12 is 0.3 percent lower, the Intel Core i5-12450H is 0.4 percent higher, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.6 percent higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is 0.6 percent lower.
Q: Does the GPU have headroom at 1080p?
A: Yes, significant headroom. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo produces 142 FPS average, and at Low settings it reaches 262 FPS, indicating the GPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution.
Q: What is the only tested configuration that fails to reach 60 FPS?
A: The 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, which averages 52 FPS. Every other resolution and preset combination in the measured data clears the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile?
A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has an average score of 43,667, which is 1 percent higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 43,223. This represents a small but measurable performance gap in the database's benchmarks.
# Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average at each resolution is as follows. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 142 FPS average, so users can enable maximum visual quality without any concern about falling below the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce 93 FPS average, again clearing 60 FPS with a comfortable margin. At 3840x2160, High settings provide 67 FPS average, which is the highest preset that remains playable at 4K. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 52 FPS and should be avoided if frame rate consistency matters. For users prioritizing smooth motion over visual fidelity, the Medium preset at 4K offers 84 FPS average with a recorded minimum of 71 FPS, providing a more stable experience than High settings in demanding scenes.