Fivem

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data for Fivem with this Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination shows a clear pattern: higher resolutions demand lower presets to maintain the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1920x1080, the system can handle the most demanding preset without dropping below the target. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 87.9 FPS, making it the best settings choice for 1080p. This leaves substantial headroom above the playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture shifts noticeably. The Ultra preset falls to 57.5 FPS average, just under the 60 FPS line. The best playable setting at this resolution is High, which produces an average of 75.1 FPS. This is a comfortable margin above the threshold, though not as commanding as the 1080p result. The data suggests that the rendering load at 1440p consumes the extra performance headroom that was visible at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the constraints become severe. High settings produce only 38.2 FPS average, Medium drops to 48.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 32.8 FPS. None of these clear the 60 FPS bar. The only playable configuration at 4K is Low, which averages 62.4 FPS. That is a slim margin. The step from Low to Medium at 4K represents a 14 FPS average difference, which is substantial. The system can run Fivem at 4K, but only with the lowest preset, and even then the margin is under 3 FPS above the threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database places this CPU at the 71st percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 17177. Its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark data are remarkably close in aggregate performance. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120, a delta of 0.3% behind the i5-11400F. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G reaches 17278, 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17074, 0.6% behind. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the i5-11400F and these alternatives would produce statistically similar CPU-bound behavior in Fivem. The 12450H and the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G sit marginally ahead, while the EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 7 164U sit marginally behind, but the differences are small enough to be effectively indistinguishable in real-world frame rates.

For the GPU side, the RTX 2070 SUPER holds the 65th percentile among all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 20282. The nearest rivals are all within 1.5% of that score. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which is 1.0% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 1.2% higher. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, 1.3% higher, and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 1.5% higher. All four alternatives would deliver nearly identical GPU performance in Fivem. The RTX 3070 Mobile, Arc B570, and Arc A750 are nominally faster, but the delta is under two percentage points, so any FPS difference would be within measurement noise.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, with average frame rates only. No minimum or maximum values are present in the measurements. At 1920x1080, the spread across presets is wide. Low settings produce 178.9 FPS average, Medium drops to 138.7 FPS, High sits at 112.7 FPS, and Ultra lands at 87.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is consistent: each step up in preset costs roughly 23 to 40 FPS. The largest single drop occurs between Low and Medium, a 40.2 FPS reduction.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low averages 116.2 FPS, Medium 90.1 FPS, High 75.1 FPS, and Ultra 57.5 FPS. The relative cost of each preset step is similar to 1080p, but the absolute deltas shrink. Between Low and Medium, the drop is 26.1 FPS. Between Medium and High, it is 15.0 FPS. Between High and Ultra, it is 17.6 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, while the other three remain above it.

At 3840x2160, the numbers compress further. Low averages 62.4 FPS, Medium 48.4 FPS, High 38.2 FPS, and Ultra 32.8 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 14.0 FPS, from Medium to High is 10.2 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 5.4 FPS. This narrowing suggests that at 4K, the bottleneck becomes more evenly distributed across the rendering pipeline, so each preset change has a smaller marginal impact. The resolution scaling is also evident: 1080p Low at 178.9 FPS versus 1440p Low at 116.2 FPS versus 4K Low at 62.4 FPS. Each resolution jump roughly halves the frame rate at the same preset.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the answer depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS at every preset. The Ultra setting averages 87.9 FPS, which is 27.9 FPS above the playable threshold. High averages 112.7 FPS, Medium 138.7 FPS, and Low 178.9 FPS. There is no configuration at 1080p that fails the 60 FPS requirement.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is conditional. Three of the four presets are playable: Low at 116.2 FPS, Medium at 90.1 FPS, and High at 75.1 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 57.5 FPS, which is 2.5 FPS below the threshold. A user who insists on Ultra settings at 1440p would need to accept sub-60 performance, but dropping to High restores a comfortable margin.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 62.4 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 48.4, 38.2, and 32.8 FPS respectively. The verdict at 4K is a qualified yes: the game runs, but only at the lowest settings, and the margin is thin. The database verdictByResolution confirms this assessment, listing Low as the only playable setting at 4K, High as the best at 1440p, and Ultra as the best at 1080p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the low preset produces 178.9 FPS, which is a very high frame rate for any game. This suggests the GPU is not the primary constraint at lower resolutions and presets. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is capable of feeding the RTX 2070 SUPER enough data to sustain these rates. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 91 FPS drop, indicating that the GPU becomes more involved as the preset increases, but even Ultra stays well above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets compared to 1080p. Low goes from 178.9 to 116.2 FPS, a 62.7 FPS reduction. Ultra goes from 87.9 to 57.5 FPS, a 30.4 FPS reduction. The resolution scaling has a larger absolute impact at lower presets, which points to the GPU handling more pixel work. The CPU is still capable, but the GPU is now the limiting factor for higher presets. The Ultra preset at 1440p fails to reach 60 FPS, while the same preset at 1080p succeeds by a wide margin.

At 3840x2160, the GPU constraint dominates. The frame rates at all presets are below 50 FPS except for Low, which just clears 60 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 29.6 FPS, compared to a 91 FPS difference at 1080p. This compression indicates that the GPU is saturated at 4K, and changing presets has a smaller relative effect because the pixel throughput is the bottleneck. The CPU has ample headroom at 4K; the 512 KB per core L2 cache and 12 MB shared L3 cache are sufficient for the game's logic, but the RTX 2070 SUPER with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is stretched by the 2160p resolution.

The data implies that Fivem is more GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU plays a larger role at 1080p where frame rates approach 180 FPS. For users targeting 1440p or 4K, the GPU is the component to upgrade first. For 1080p with high refresh rate monitors, the i5-11400F is the more critical piece.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming with this combination?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 87.9 FPS, which is the highest settings preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. The database lists Ultra as the best settings at this resolution.

Q: Can this system handle 4K at high settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 38.2, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset at 4K reaches playable levels, averaging 62.4 FPS.

Q: How much performance drops when going from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset?

A: At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 178.9 at 1080p to 116.2 at 1440p, a reduction of 62.7 FPS. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 87.9 to 57.5 FPS, a reduction of 30.4 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 2070 SUPER or the i5-11400F the limiting factor at 1440p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary constraint at 1440p. The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 57.5 FPS, just below the threshold, while the CPU has a 71st percentile benchmark score and its nearest rivals are within 0.6% in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the playable threshold for this game?

A: The database uses a playableThresholdFps of 60. Any preset and resolution combination with an average FPS at or above 60 is considered playable.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Fivem?

A: The comboRankInGame places this system at rank 2129 out of 3707 tested combinations. This means it sits in the middle of the distribution, with roughly 57% of tested combinations performing better and 43% performing worse.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-11400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2129 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, just past the halfway point. The rank reflects the GPU's 65th percentile standing among all graphics cards and the CPU's 71st percentile among all processors. Neither component is a standout, but both are above average individually.

The rank makes sense given the measured FPS data. At 1080p, this combo delivers strong performance across all presets, with Ultra at 87.9 FPS. At 1440p, it handles three of four presets above 60 FPS. At 4K, it only manages Low settings. The 3707 total combos include many with more recent GPUs and CPUs, so a rank of 2129 indicates that this older system is competitive but not exceptional. The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Arc A750 and the RTX 3070 Mobile, score within 1.5% of the RTX 2070 SUPER, meaning these alternatives would likely produce nearly identical ranks in Fivem. The CPU's nearest rivals are similarly clustered, with all four within 0.6% of the i5-11400F's average benchmark score. This combo sits in a crowded performance band where small percentage differences translate into few practical FPS changes.