Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080 with this hardware?

A: Ultra settings run at an average of 67 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. High, Medium, and Low also clear 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, but only up to Medium settings. Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. Low averages 89 FPS. High drops to 56 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target.

Q: Is 4K playable with this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, every preset falls below 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 50 FPS, followed by Medium at 39 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-11400F compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17177. It sits 0.3% above the AMD EPYC 7H12 (17120) and 0.6% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (17074). It trails the Intel Core i5-12450H by 0.4% (17239) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G by 0.6% (17278).

Q: Where does the Intel Arc B570 rank among other GPUs in the database?

A: The Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20582, which is 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% lower at 20534.

Q: How many total hardware combinations have been tested in Fivem, and where does this one place?

A: This combo ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower portion of the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data shows a pattern where resolution scaling directly influences which component carries the workload. At 1920x1080, the CPU has more influence because the GPU can produce frames quickly enough to expose processor limits. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 69 FPS: Low runs at 136 FPS, Medium at 107 FPS, High at 86 FPS, and Ultra at 67 FPS. The performance drops steadily as settings increase, which indicates that the GPU becomes more relevant even at 1080p when visual effects load increases.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to dominate. Low settings run at 89 FPS, Medium at 71 FPS, High at 56 FPS, and Ultra at 44 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 18 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 15 FPS. The scaling is consistent and shows that each preset step costs a similar amount of performance. The CPU remains capable at this resolution; the bottleneck appears to shift toward the graphics card as pixel count rises.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings produce 50 FPS, Medium produces 39 FPS, High produces 31 FPS, and Ultra produces 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 26 FPS, and every preset falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The CPU has enough headroom at 4K to feed the GPU, but the Arc B570 cannot maintain fluid frame rates at this pixel density regardless of settings.

The recorded data suggests that the Arc B570 is the primary constraint at 1440p and above, while the i5-11400F provides adequate compute for the game at 1080p. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, are sufficient to avoid severe frame pacing issues at the tested settings. The GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus deliver 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is enough for 1080p and 1440p but not for sustained 4K performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the highest quality setting the hardware can run while remaining playable.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. Low also clears the threshold at 89 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while still meeting the playability requirement.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 50 FPS, but it does not meet the playable threshold, so no recommendation can be made for 4K.

The Verdict

The verdict data indicates that this PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 across all four tested presets. Ultra averages 67 FPS, High averages 86 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS, and Low averages 136 FPS. Every setting clears the 60 FPS threshold, so 1080p users have full freedom to choose their preferred quality level.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with restrictions. Low and Medium both clear 60 FPS, with Medium averaging 71 FPS and Low averaging 89 FPS. High falls to 56 FPS, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS, so those settings should be avoided at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS on any preset. The highest average is 50 FPS on Low, followed by 39 FPS on Medium, 31 FPS on High, and 24 FPS on Ultra. The playable settings list for 4K is empty, which means this hardware is not suitable for 4K play in Fivem.

The overall ranking of 2980 out of 3707 combinations shows that this is a mid-to-lower tier setup for Fivem. It is fully capable at 1080p, viable at 1440p with reduced settings, and not viable at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded FPS values are as follows: Low averages 50 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. No minimum or maximum values were recorded for Low, High, or Ultra.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 89 FPS, Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS, High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 44 FPS. The Medium preset has the only complete min/max range at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, Low averages 136 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS, High averages 86 FPS, and Ultra averages 67 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only full min/max range.

The minimum FPS values are only recorded for Medium settings at each resolution. At 1440p Medium, the minimum touches exactly 60 FPS, which matches the playable threshold. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 91 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 33 FPS, far below the threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-11400F and the Intel Arc B570 ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem. This places it in the 20th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly 80 percent of recorded hardware combinations outperform it in this game.

The CPU contributes a solid foundation: the i5-11400F is at the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database and has an average benchmark score of 17177. The GPU, however, is only at the 65th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 20556. The gap between CPU percentile and GPU percentile explains why the system struggles at higher resolutions; the graphics card is the weaker link relative to the processor.

The rank of 2980 suggests that while the CPU is above average, the GPU holds the combo back in Fivem's multiplayer environments, which tend to be sensitive to both CPU and GPU performance depending on the scenario. The 1080p results are strong, but the 4K results indicate a hard ceiling for this pairing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-11400F are all within 0.6 percent of its average benchmark score of 17177. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120, which is 0.3 percent lower. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239, which is 0.4 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278, which is 0.6 percent higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17074, which is 0.6 percent lower. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem, assuming the same GPU and memory configuration.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Arc B570 are similarly close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1 percent lower. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is 0.1 percent higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which is 0.4 percent lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is 0.5 percent higher. The Arc A750 is the closest match, and swapping the B570 for an A750 would yield essentially identical frame rates within measurement error.

For users seeking similar overall behavior, pairing the i5-11400F with an Arc A750 would be the most direct equivalent, since both components are nearly tied in their respective benchmark scores. A system with the i5-12450H and the Arc B570 would also behave similarly, as the CPU is only 0.4 percent faster. The practical differences between these combinations are negligible in Fivem, where the measured FPS deltas would fall within normal run-to-run variation.