Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data for Fivem with the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets. The database records average frame rates for every setting, with minimum and maximum values captured only for the Medium preset at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the combination delivers average frame rates that range from 173 FPS to 224 FPS depending on the preset. The Low preset records the highest average at 224 FPS. High settings produce an average of 190 FPS. Medium settings average 205 FPS, with the measured range spanning from a minimum of 175 FPS to a maximum of 236 FPS. Ultra settings average 173 FPS, which is the lowest average at this resolution but still far above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the recorded averages remain consistently high. Low settings reach 195 FPS on average. High settings average 165 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 179 FPS, with the minimum at 152 FPS and the maximum at 206 FPS. Ultra settings average 130 FPS, representing a noticeable drop from the other presets but still delivering a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates scale down as expected, but the combination remains highly capable. Low settings average 147 FPS. Medium settings average 116 FPS, with the recorded range between 99 FPS minimum and 133 FPS maximum. High settings average 93 FPS. Ultra settings average 72 FPS, which is the lowest average recorded across all resolutions and presets in this dataset.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 5090 D provides substantial headroom even at 4K, and the i5-10400F does not appear to bottleneck the GPU in this title at any tested setting. The frame rate progression from Low to Ultra is not perfectly linear, with the Medium preset sometimes exceeding High, but all values remain comfortably within playable territory.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 173 FPS. The data indicates that every preset at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold with significant margin, so users can select Ultra without concern.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, averaging 130 FPS. The gap between Ultra and the next preset down, High at 165 FPS, is substantial, but Ultra remains well above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings average 72 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the tightest margin in the dataset, but the average still provides enough headroom for most gameplay scenarios. High settings at this resolution average 93 FPS, offering additional stability if preferred.

The verdict by resolution confirms that all playable settings lists include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra at every resolution. The best settings are Ultra at each resolution, with the corresponding averages of 173 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p, and 72 FPS at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 72 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average is 224 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the Medium preset compare to High at each resolution?

A: At 1080p, Medium averages 205 FPS while High averages 190 FPS. At 1440p, Medium averages 179 FPS while High averages 165 FPS. At 4K, Medium averages 116 FPS while High averages 93 FPS. In all cases, Medium outperforms High.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded?

A: The database only records minimum and maximum values for the Medium preset. At 1080p, the range is 175 FPS minimum to 236 FPS maximum. At 1440p, the range is 152 FPS to 206 FPS. At 4K, the range is 99 FPS to 133 FPS.

Q: Is there any resolution where the average frame rate falls below 60 FPS?

A: No. The lowest average recorded is 72 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. Every other preset and resolution combination records a higher average.

Q: Which preset provides the largest performance gap between resolutions?

A: Ultra settings show the largest variation. The average drops from 173 FPS at 1080p to 130 FPS at 1440p, then to 72 FPS at 4K. This represents a 101 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Fivem with excellent performance across all tested configurations. The verdict by resolution lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings at every resolution, meaning every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1920x1080, the combination delivers an Ultra average of 173 FPS, which is nearly three times the playability threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 130 FPS, still more than double the threshold. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 72 FPS, which clears the threshold by 12 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration where the margin narrows, but it remains playable.

For users prioritizing maximum visual quality, Ultra at 4K is viable. For those who prefer higher frame rates, dropping to High at 4K yields 93 FPS, or Medium at 4K yields 116 FPS. The combination shows no weak points in this title, and the CPU does not limit the GPU based on the recorded data.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-10400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6756E with a score of 14163 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core 7 160UL with a score of 14232 and a delta of -0.3 percent, the AMD EPYC 7552 with a score of 14115 and a delta of 0.5 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C with a score of 14277 and a delta of -0.6 percent. These CPUs all sit within a narrow band around the i5-10400F's average benchmark score, so systems built with them would likely produce similar CPU-bound behavior in Fivem.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT with an average score of 76904 and a delta of 1.1 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT with an average score of 78940 and a delta of -1.6 percent, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB with an average score of 79396 and a delta of -2.1 percent, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with an average score of 79605 and a delta of -2.4 percent. These GPUs have average scores within roughly 2.5 percent of the RTX 5090 D, suggesting comparable overall compute performance in synthetic benchmarks, though the RTX 5090 D retains its lead in the recorded Fivem data.

The data indicates that the i5-10400F sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5090 D sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. This percentile gap reflects the pairing of a mid-range CPU with a top-tier GPU, but the Fivem measurements show no adverse effects from the combination.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D ranks 335th out of 3707 tested combinations in the database for Fivem. This places it in the top 10 percent of all recorded configurations.

The ranking reflects the strong GPU performance carrying the combination. The RTX 5090 D's percentile of 92 among all GPUs, paired with the i5-10400F's percentile of 68 among all CPUs, produces a system that handles Fivem with substantial headroom at every resolution. The rank of 335 out of 3707 indicates that most competing combinations in the database fall behind this pairing, though there are still many configurations that achieve higher frame rates, likely featuring newer or higher-end CPUs alongside comparable GPUs.

The measured FPS data supports the ranking. Even the weakest recorded result, 72 FPS at 4K Ultra, remains above the playability threshold. The strongest result, 224 FPS at 1080p Low, demonstrates the ceiling of this pairing. Between those extremes, the combination offers consistent performance that would satisfy most users regardless of their display resolution or quality preferences.