Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the best playable setting at 4K with this Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combo?

A: The database shows that at 3840x2160, the only preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS is Low, which delivers 73.2 FPS. Medium drops to 55.9 FPS, High falls to 43 FPS, and Ultra reaches just 37.2 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 1440p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 66.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average FPS is 127.4. Moving to 2560x1440 High reduces the average to 84.9 FPS, a drop of 42.5 FPS or roughly 33%. The scaling indicates the GPU remains the dominant factor at these settings.

Q: How does the RTX 5060's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 26331. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (0.8% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% lower.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232 (0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277 (0.6% higher). All five processors are within 0.6% of each other.

Q: Which resolution offers the highest average FPS at Ultra settings?

A: The highest Ultra preset average is at 1920x1080, where the combo records 95.4 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average drops to 66.2 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra, it falls to 37.2 FPS.

# CPU and GPU Roles

The data from the measured FPS table shows a clear pattern: the RTX 5060 GPU carries the performance load in Fivem, with CPU scaling becoming more visible only at lower resolutions and lower presets. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 201.1 FPS, which is a frame rate where the i5-10400F's six cores and twelve threads can start to become a limiting factor. However, at 3840x2160 High, the average drops to 43 FPS, a figure that sits far below what the CPU is capable of delivering, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K.

The resolution scaling between Low presets illustrates this division of labor. Moving from 1920x1080 Low (201.1 FPS) to 2560x1440 Low (131.8 FPS) is a 34% reduction, and then to 3840x2160 Low (73.2 FPS) is another 44% reduction. These large drops are characteristic of GPU-bound workloads, where pixel count directly dictates the render load. The CPU's 3dmark_max_threads score of 4735 and passmark_multithread score of 12115 show it has ample headroom for multiplayer scenarios, but the measured FPS figures confirm that resolution scaling is driven by the GPU.

At 1440p and 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra presets reveals the GPU's architecture. At 2560x1440, Low averages 131.8 FPS while Ultra averages 66.2 FPS, a 65.6 FPS difference. At 1920x1080, the same comparison shows 201.1 FPS versus 95.4 FPS, a 105.7 FPS difference. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles the higher resolutions, but the Ultra preset at 4K (37.2 FPS) shows the limits of the card's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute when pushed to the maximum.

The 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 3628 for the GPU reinforces the conclusion that Fivem's rendering at higher resolutions is entirely GPU-limited. The CPU's cinebench r23 multicore score of 10283 and singlecore score of 1451 are adequate for the game's multiplayer logic, but they never appear as the primary constraint in the measured data. At 1080p Low, the 201.1 FPS average is close to the practical ceiling for this CPU generation, but at every other tested setting, the GPU dictates performance.

# Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 73.2 FPS. Medium falls below the threshold at 55.9 FPS, so the best playable setting is Low. This is the maximum visual quality that maintains smooth gameplay at 4K.

At 2560x1440, all four presets clear the 60 FPS bar. The most demanding preset that remains playable is Ultra, which averages 66.2 FPS. High averages 84.9 FPS, Medium averages 102.7 FPS, and Low averages 131.8 FPS. Since Ultra still exceeds 60 FPS, it is the recommended setting for 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the combo is comfortably playable at every preset. Ultra averages 95.4 FPS, High averages 127.4 FPS, Medium averages 161.1 FPS, and Low averages 201.1 FPS. The best setting is Ultra, as it provides the highest visual quality while remaining well above the playable threshold.

# The Verdict

The recorded data answers decisively: this PC can run Fivem, but the playable range depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is clear: every preset from Low to Ultra clears 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 95.4 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this combo, offering maximum visual fidelity with substantial headroom.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is also positive. All four presets are playable, and Ultra still averages 66.2 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Players seeking the highest settings at 1440p will get a smooth experience, though the margin over the threshold is narrower than at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. Only the Low preset averages above 60 FPS at 73.2 FPS. Medium (55.9 FPS), High (43 FPS), and Ultra (37.2 FPS) all fall short. The system can run Fivem at 4K, but only with reduced settings. The data shows that the RTX 5060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are the limiting factors at this resolution, as the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for higher presets at 4K.

# Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are clustered tightly around its average benchmark score of 14185. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, a 0.2% difference, meaning it would behave nearly identically in Fivem's CPU workloads. The AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115, 0.5% lower, which is also within noise. On the higher side, the Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232 (0.3% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277 (0.6% higher). Any of these processors would produce similar frame rates in the measured scenarios, since the GPU is the dominant bottleneck in most settings.

For the GPU, the RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 places it among a tight group. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (0.8% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% lower. In Fivem, these GPUs would deliver nearly the same FPS at each resolution and preset, since the performance delta is under 1.5% across all rivals. The practical outcome is that swapping the RTX 5060 for any of these alternatives would not materially change the playable settings at any resolution.

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1675 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 45th percentile overall. This means the combo sits in the middle of the database, above many older or lower-end pairings but below the top quartile of high-end configurations. The rank reflects the balance of the two components: the CPU is at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, but the combination's mid-pack ranking in Fivem suggests that the game's specific demands, particularly at 4K, hold this pairing back from the top tiers.

The ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the combo performs strongly with Ultra at 95.4 FPS, which would place it well within playable territory for most users. At 1440p, the Ultra average of 66.2 FPS keeps it above the threshold. The 4K results, where only Low is playable, explain why the combo does not rank higher: many other tested combinations likely handle 4K Ultra with more ease. The 1675th position out of 3707 is a fair representation of a system that excels at mainstream resolutions but struggles at the highest end.